Keywords
motivation
self-efficacy
self-regulated learning
social regulation
strategy use
How to Cite
Number of views: 419
Number of downloads: 295
Abstract
The key to successful language learning depends on the extent to which learners are self-regulated in learning a second or foreign language (L2). In this process, learners’ perceptions and beliefs about their abilities play a crucial role in predicting or controlling positive or negative emotions, motivation and the use of strategies. Therefore, it is vital to clarify the role that learners’ perceived abilities play in self-regulated language learning. The present paper aims to: (1) provide a review of empirical studies related to L2 strategy use, motivation, and social regulation about ability beliefs, (2) explore the reciprocal relationship between these constructs, and (3) suggest future research directions that will help promote self-regulated language learning research. By doing so, we aim to contribute to the broadening of L2 proficiency research, provide a more comprehensive understanding of the second language acquisition process, and ultimately support language teachers in understanding the developmental processes of L2 learners.
References
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018). The L2 motivational self-system: A meta-analysis. Studies Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 721-754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.4.2
Anam, S., & Stracke, E. (2016). Language learning strategies of Indonesian primary school students: In relation to self-efficacy beliefs. System, 60, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.001
Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2023). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 207-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2(1), 21-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00024
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Boekaerts, M. (2011). What have we learned about the social-student engagement link? Teachers College Record, 113(2), 375-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300207
Cai, Y., & Xing, K. (2023). Examining the mediation of engagement between self-efficacy and language achievement. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2217801
Chen, J. (2022). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning (SRL) inter-ventions on L2 learning achievement, strategy employment and self-efficacy: A meta-analytic study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1021101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021101
Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative & mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Sage.
Diseth, A. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.05dor
Du, G., & Man, D. (2022). Person factors and strategic processing in L2 lis-tening comprehension: Examining the role of vocabulary size, meta-cognitive knowledge, self-efficacy, and strategy use. System, 107, 102801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102801
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.95.2.256
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance achievement motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.1.5
Gao, X. (2007). Has language learning strategy research come to an end? A response to Tseng et al. (2006). Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 615-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm034
Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The role of agency and context. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692450
Goetze, J., & Driver, M. (2022). Is learning really just believing? A meta-analysis of self-efficacy and achievement in SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 233-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.4
Graham, S. (2007). Learner strategies and self-efficacy: Making the connection. The Language Learning Journal, 35(1), 81-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730701315832
Graham, S. (2022). SE and language learning: What it is and what it isn’t. The Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 186-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2045679
Graham, S., Woore, R., Porter, A., Courtney, L., & Savory, C. (2020). Navigating the challenges of L2 reading: Self-efficacy, self-regulatory reading strategies, and learner profiles. Modern Language Journal, 104(4), 693-714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12670
Hadwin, A. (2021). Commentary and future directions: What can multi-modal data reveal about temporal and adaptive processes in self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 72, 101287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101287
Hadwin, A., Järvelä., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and socially shared regulation in collaborative learning environment. In D. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 83-106). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-6
Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and socially-shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113, 240-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300204
Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.3.588
Irie, K. (2022). Self-efficacy. In T. Gregersen & S. Mercer (Eds.)., The Routledge handbook of the psychology of language learning and teaching (pp. 100-111). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321498-11
Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300205
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2007). Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 122-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.012
Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2017). Supporting groups’ emotion and motivation regulation during collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.11.004
Khajavy, G. H. (2021). Modeling the relations between foreign language engagement, emotions, grit and reading achievement. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 241-259). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.22730722.18
Kim, D.-H., Wang, C., Ahn, H. S., & Bong, M. (2015). English language learners’ self-efficacy profiles and relationship with self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 136-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.016
Li, Y., & Wang, C. (2010). An empirical study of reading self-efficacy and the use of reading strategies in the Chinese EFL context. The Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 144-162.
Liu, W. C. (2021). Implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals: A look at students’ intrinsic motivation and achievement in mathematics. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 593715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.593715
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2016). Changing language mindsets: Implications for goal orientations and responses to failure in and outside the second language classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 22-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.03.004
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2017). Measuring language mindsets and modeling their relations with goal orientations and emotional and behavioral responses in failure situations. Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 214-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12380
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2019). Language mindsets, meaning-making, and motivation. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 537-559). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28380-3_26
Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35(3), 338-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.01.003
Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2017). Capturing temporal and sequential patterns of self-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 160-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.009
McEown, K., & Sugita-McEown, K. (2018). Individual, parental and teacher support factors of self-regulation in Japanese students. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(4), 389-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1468761
Mercer, S. (2015). Social network analysis and complex dynamic systems. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre., & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 73-82). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.26931945.12
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contempo-rary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024563
Mills, N. A. (2014). Self-efficacy in second language acquisition. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.)., Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 6-22). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.26932053.5
Mills, N. A., & Péron, M. (2009). Global simulation and writing self-beliefs of college intermediate French students. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156(1), 239-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034436
Mori, Y. (1999). Epistemological beliefs and language learning beliefs: What do language learners believe about their learning? Language Learning,49(3), 377-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00094
Nakata, Y. (2016). Promoting self-regulation through collaborative work: Insights from a multiple case study of foreign language learners. EU-ROSLA Yearbook, 16, 59-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.16.03nak
Nakata, Y. (2019a). Encouraging student teachers to support self-regulated learning: A multiple case study on prospective language teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 200-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.007
Nakata, Y. (2019b). Promoting self-regulation in low achievers: A case study of Japanese university EFL students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 110-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12269
Nakata, Y. (2022). Crossing boundaries between teacher autonomy and classroom: Sharing the concept of socially shared regulation. In Y. Ki-mura., L. Yang., T-Y. Kim., & Y. Nakata (Eds.), Language teacher moti-vation, autonomy and development in East Asia (pp. 35-54). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93467-5_3
Nakata, Y., Nitta, R., & Tsuda, A. (2022). Understanding motivation and classroom modes of regulation in collaborative learning: An exploratory study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 14-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1846040
Negishi, M. (2017). Eigoryoku wo nobashiteiru gakko no youin wo saguru [Exploring factors contributing to the improvement of English profi-ciency at school]. English Teachers’ Magazine, 66(5), 32-34.
Newman, R. (2008). The motivational role of adaptive help seeking in self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmermann (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 315-337). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Oh, Y.-K. (2022). The growth trajectories of L2 self-efficacy and its effects on L2 learning: Using a curve-of-factors model. Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 147-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab005
Oxford, R. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
Panadero, E., Kirschner, P. A., Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2015). How individual self-regulation affects group regulation and performance: A shared regulation intervention. Small Group Research, 46(4), 431-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415591219
Perry, N. E., Hutchinson, L., & Thauberger, C. (2008). Talking about teaching self-regulated learning: Scaffolding student teachers’ development and use of practices that promote self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 97-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.010
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Plonsky, L. (2019). Language learning strategy instruction: Recent research and future directions. In A. U. Chamot & V. Harris (Eds.), Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and implementation (pp. 3-21). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.22730667.9
Raoofi, S., Tan, B. H., & Chan, S. H. (2012). Self-efficacy in second/foreign language learning contexts. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 60-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p60
Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit? The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/501484
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1(4), 313-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860290106805
Rose, H. (2012). Reconceptualizing strategic learning in the face of self-regulation: Throwing language learning strategies out with the bathwater. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 92-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr045
Rose, H., Briggs, J. G., Boggs, J. A., Sergio, L., & Ivanova-Slavianskaia, N. (2018). A systematic review of language learner strategy in the face of self-regulation. System, 72, 151-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.12.002
Ryan, S., & Mercer, S. (2009). Language learning mindsets and strategic learning behavior. Bulletin of Shotoku University, 20, 73-80.
Ryan, S., & Mercer, S. (2012a). Implicit theories: Language learning mindsets. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 74-89). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829_6
Ryan, S., & Mercer, S. (2012b). Language learning mindsets across cultural settings: English learners in Austria and Japan. OnCUE Journal, 6(1), 6-22. https://jaltcue.org/files/OnCUE/OCJ6-1/OCJ61%20pp%2006-22%20Ryan.pdf
Smiley, P. A., Buttitta, K. V., Chung, S. Y., Dubon, V. X., & Chang, L. K. (2016). Mediation models of implicit theories and achievement goals predict planning and withdrawal after failure. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 878-894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9575-5
Takeuchi, O. (2019). Language learning strategies: Insights from the past and directions for the future. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 683-702). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_37
Tseng W.-T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami046
Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
Volet, S., Vauras., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative View. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 215-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213584
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, C., & Bai, B. (2017). Validating the instruments to measure ESL/EFL learners’ self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 931-947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.355
Wang, C., & Sun, T. (2020). Relationship between self-efficacy and language proficiency: A meta-analysis. System, 95, 102366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102366
Wang, I. (2021). Self-regulation in psychology. In T. Gregersen & S. Mercer (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of psychology of language learning and teaching (pp. 218-230). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321498-20
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.92.4.548
Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of infor-mation processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Yabukoshi, T. (2021). Self-regulation and self-efficacy for the improvement of listening proficiency outside the classroom. The Language Learning Journal, 49(1), 27-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1472626
Zarrinabadi, N., Rezazadeh, M., & Chehrazi, A. (2023). The links between grammar learning strategies and language mindsets among L2 and L3 learners: Examining the role of gender. International Journal of Multilingualism, 20(2), 347-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1871356
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.81.3.329
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). Guilford.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Zimmerman, B. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49-64). Routledge.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yoshiyuki Nakata, Osamu Takeuchi, Maya Sugita McEown
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.