Keywords
sociocognitive theory
sociocultural theory
language learning
language proficiency
calibration
confidence
How to Cite
Number of views: 203
Number of downloads: 216
Abstract
This commentary discusses the important contribution of the special issue on ability beliefs in language learning at school. The nature of language learning is highly complex and requires complex theories to explain its linguistic, cognitive and social phenomena. I am particularly interested in writing a commentary on this special issue, given my long-term intrinsic interest in learning about psychological constructs that influence language learners’ behaviors and performance. This article considers and responds to various ability belief constructs that the authors have presented, such as self-efficacy, self-concepts, and mindsets, as well as factors that contribute to the operation of these constructs in language learning. This article finally reflects on the issues I have learned from this commentary, pointing out exciting avenues for researching ability beliefs in language learning.
References
Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4(87), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Atkinson (2011). A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 143-166). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830932
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191
Bonneville-Roussy, A., Bouffard, T., & Vezeau, C. (2017). Trajectories of self-evaluation bias in primary and secondary school: Parental antecedents and academic consequences. Journal of School Psychology, 63, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.02.002
Bouffard, T., Vezeau, C., Roy, M., & Lengelé, A. (2011). Stability of biases in self-evaluation and relations to well-being among elementary school children. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 221-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.08.003
Brown, G. T., L., Andrade, H. L., & Chen, F. (2015). Accuracy in student self-assessment: Directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 444-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523
Butler, D., & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
Butler, R. (2011). Are positive illusions about academic competence always adaptive, under all circumstances: New results and future directions? International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 251-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.08.006
Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effect of context, norms and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(2), 190-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X03022002003
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Press.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. -Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgements and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(4), 101859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of func-tioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.218
Gabryś-Barker, D., & Gałajda, D. (Eds.) (2016). Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32954-3
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (5th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315181752
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (Eds.) (2014). Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203808184
Gonida, E., & Leondari, A. (2011). Patterns of motivation among adoles-cents with biased and accurate self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 209-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.08.002
Gucciardi, D. F., & Hanton, S. (2016). Mental toughness: Critical reflections and future considerations. In R. Schinke, K. McGannon, & B. Smith (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of sport psychology (pp. 439-448). Routledge.
Jiang, Y., & Kleitman, S. (2015). Metacognition and motivation: Links between confidence, self-protection and self-enhancement. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 222-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.025
Kelly, G. A. (1995). The psychology of personal construct. Norton.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121
Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acqui-sition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24-47). Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Complexity: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11-50). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.02lar
León, S. P., Panadero, E., & Garcia‑Martinez, I. (2023). How accurate are our students? A meta‑analytic systematic review on self‑assessment scoring accuracy. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), Article 106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09819-0
Leung, C. (2022). Language proficiency: From description to prescription and back. Educational Linguistics, 1(1), 56-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eduling-2021-0006
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2021). How languages are learned (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (Eds.) (2017). Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 129-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023001129
Mercer, S. (2012). Self-concept: Situating the self. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 10-25). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829_2
Mercer, S., Ryan, S., & Williams, M. (2012). Conclusion: Final remarks. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 239-247). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829_16
Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57(3), 417-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00421.x
Möller, J, Zitzmann, S., Machts, N., Helm, F., & Wolff, F. (2020). A meta-analysis of relations between achievement and self-perception. Review of Educational Research, 90, 376-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320919354
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. Hodder Education.
Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. Oxford University Press.
Phakiti, A. (2007). Strategic competence and EFL reading test performance. Peter Lang.
Phakiti, A. (2008). Construct validation of Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Language Testing, 25(2), 237-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207086783
Phakiti, A. (2016). Test takers’ performance appraisals, appraisal calibration, and cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(2), 75-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1154555
Phakiti, A., Hirsh, D., & Woodrow, L. (2013). It is not only English: Roles of other learner factors on English language learning and academic learning of ESL international students in Australia. Journal of Research in International Education, 12(3), 239-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240913513520
Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 11(10), 1-13.
Ross, S. J., & Masters, M. C. (Eds) (2023). Longitudinal studies of second language learning: Quantitative methods and outcomes. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087939
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Ryan, S., & Mercer, S. (2012). Implicit theories: Language learning mind-sets. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 74-89). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829_6
Sampson, R. (2012). The language-learning self, self-enhancement activi-ties, and self perceptual change. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 317-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812436898
Sharkey, J., & Layzer, C. (2000). Whose definition of success? Identifying factors that affect English language learners’ access to academic success and resources. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 352-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587961
Stankov, L., & Crawford, J. D. (1996). Confidence judgments in studies of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(6), 971-986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00130-4
Stone, N. J. (2000). Exploring the relationship between calibration and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 12(4), 437-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009084430926
Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: The past, current status and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 731721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aek Phakiti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.