Keywords
parental disinterest
motivation
amotivation
L2 competence
How to Cite
Number of views: 693
Number of downloads: 472
Abstract
This study investigated the relationships between various affective variables and two measures of competence in English, for 190 South Korean high school students. A 55-item questionnaire was used to measure attitudes (Attitudes toward English Speakers and their Communities and Attitudes toward the English-speaking Culture), motivation (Motivational Intensity, Desire to Learn and Attitudes toward the Learning of English), amotivation, parental involvement (Active Parental Encouragement, Passive Parental Encouragement and Parental Pressure), parental disinterest and students’ competence in L2 (English- EXAM and English-SELF). Pearson product-moment coefficients indicate that active and passive forms of parental encouragement correlate with motivationto learn, as conceptualized by Gardner (1985, 2010), as well as with parental pressure, which suggests that South Korean students report undergoing forms of pressure when their parents actively or passively encourage them. Furthermore, the obtained correlations of the active and passive forms of encouragement with different variables suggest that the two forms represent two distinct concepts. While parental disinterest correlated negatively with motivational variables, parental pressure correlated only with motivational intensity, and only weakly. Therefore, parental pressure seems not to interact significantly with participants’ attitudes, motivation and competence. Multiple linear regression analyses confirm the importance of motivation to learn for students' L2 competence.References
Barton, A. (1997). Boys’ under-competence in GCSE modern languages: Reviewing the reasons. Language Learning Journal, 16, 11-16.
Bartram, B. (2006). An examination of perceptions of parental influence on attitudes to language learning. Educational Research, 48(2), 211-221.
Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. British Medical Journal, 314-275.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Corter, C., & Pelletier, J. (2004). The rise and stall of parent and community involvement in schools. Orbit, 34(3), 7-12.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behaviour: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98- 119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning, 40(1), 46-78.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Arnold.
Gardner, R. C. (2001). Language learning motivation: The student, the teacher, and the researcher. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 8-26.
Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socioeducational model. New York: Peter Lang.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 266-272.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in secondlanguage learning. Rowley: Newbury House.
Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1981). On the development of the Attitude/Motivation Test Battery. Canadian Modern Language Review, 37, 510-525.
Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., & Holbein, M. F. D. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 99-123.
Han, S-A. (2003). Do South Korean adult learners like native English speaking teachers more than Korean teachers of English? AARE Conference Papers Abstracts 2003. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/03pap/abs03.htm
Hung, C., & Marjoribanks, K. (2005). Parents, teachers and children’s school outcomes: A Taiwanese study. Educational Studies, 31(1), 1-13.
Hwang, Y. (2001). Why do South Korean students study hard? Reflections on Paik’s study. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(6), 609-618.
Kim, Y. K., & Kim, T. Y. (2011). The effect of Korean secondary school students’ perceptual learning styles and ideal L2 self on motivated L2 behavior and English proficiency. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 11(1). Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/taeyoungkim/22
LeBlanc, R., & Painchaud, G. (1985). Self-assessment as a second language placement instrument. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 673-687.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1989). Anxiety and second-language learning: Toward a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 39(2), 251-275.
Masgoret, A. M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53(1), 167-210.
Matsuzaki Carreira, J. (2005). New framework of intrinsic / extrinsic and integrative / instrumental motivation in second language acquisition. The Keiai Journal of International Studies, 16, 39-64.
Mueller, D. J. (1986). Measuring social attitudes. A handbook for researchers and practitioners. New York: Teachers College Press.
Niederhauser, J. S. (1997). Motivating learners: At South Korean universities. English Teaching Forum, 35(1), 8-11. Retrieved from http://eca.state.gov/forum/vols/vol/no1/index.htm
Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and selfdetermination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57-85.
Nunan, D. (2005). Important tasks of English education: Asia-wide and beyond. Asian EFL Journal, 7(3). Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/September_05_dn.php
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, L. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher.
Pae, T. I. (2008). Second language orientation and self-determination theory: A structural analysis of the factors affecting second language competence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(1), 5-27.
Park, J. K. (2009). ‘English fever’ in South Korea: Its history and symptoms. English Today, 25(1), 50-57.
Phillips, D., & Filmer-Sankey, C. (1993). Diversification in modern language teaching: Choice and the national curriculum. London: Routledge.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and application (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Roever, C., & Powers, D. E. (2005). Effects of language of administration on a self-assessment of language skills (ETS RM-04-06). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
Sorensen, C. W. (1994). Success and education in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38(1), 10-35.
Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles and adolescent school competence. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 125-146.
Stevens, G., Kinam, J., & Hyun, J. S. (2006). Short-term migration and the acquisition of a world language. International Migration, 44(1), 167-180.
Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66-97). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Tannenbaum, R. J., Rosenfeld, M., Breyer, F. J., & Wilson, K. (2000). Linking TOEIC scores to self-assessments of English-language abilities: A study of score interpretation. Unpublished manuscript.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 271-360). New York: Academic Press.
Wang, B. D. (2004). Family background factors and mathematics success: A comparison of Chinese and US students. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(1), 40-54.
Wilson, K. M. (1999). Validity of a global self-rating of ESL speaking proficiency based on an FSI/ILR-referenced scale (ETS RR-99-13). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
Young, A. S. (1994). Motivational state and process within the socio-linguistic context. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.