Keywords
foreign language learning
language learners’ images
language learners’ metaphors
learners’ beliefs
metaphor analysis
How to Cite
Number of views: 697
Number of downloads: 426
Abstract
In this paper, I will argue that awareness of images and metaphors held by foreign language learners about the nature of the target language and its learning can be of substantial value and provide teaching practitioners with useful insights about how to deal with various language learning problems. To elicit images which learners hold about foreign language learning, a questionnaire was given to 350 learners of English in different places in Iran. The questionnaire asked the respondents to provide images about learning a foreign language by using a sentence completion task: “Learning a foreign language is like . . .” The responses gained in 200 questionnaires were content-analyzed and the identified images and metaphors were summarized under more broad-ranging categories. The information that the metaphors and the resulting metaphorical categories provide and the theoretical interpretations which can plausibly be made are discussed in some detail and put in a cognitive-psychological perspective.References
Andrews, S. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aragao, R. (2011). Beliefs and emotions in foreign language learning. System, 39(3), 302-313.
Arnold, J. (1999). Affect in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berry, R. (2004). Awareness of metalanguage. Language Awareness, 13(1), 1-16.
Block, D. (1992). Metaphors we teach and learn by. Prospect, 7(3), 42-55.
Block, D. (1997). Learning by listening to language learners. System, 25(3), 347-360.
Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75, 185-199.
Cook-Sather, A. (2003). Movement of mind: The matrix, metaphors, and reimagining education, Teacher College Records, 105, 946-977.
Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: What do learners believe about them? System, 27(4), 493-513.
de Guerrero, M., & Villamil, O. (2002). Metaphorical conceptualizations of ESL teaching and learning. Language Teaching Research, 6(2), 95-120.
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
Ellis, R. (2002). A metaphorical analysis of learner beliefs. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske,& A. Rhode (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 163-179). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Finkbeiner, C. (2003). What teachers think about how students read. In B. DiBiase (Ed.), Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (pp. 73-94). Melbourne: Language Australia.
Fortune, A. (2005). Learners' use of metalanguage in collaborative formfocusedL2 output tasks. Language Awareness, 14(1), 21-38.
Gerjets, P. H. & Hesse, F. W. (2004). When are powerful learning environments effective? The role of learner activity and students' conception of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 445-465.
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529-562.
Gibbs, R. W., Lima, P. L. C., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189-1210.
Gibbs, R. W., & O’Brian, J. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 36(1), 35-58.
Hawkins, E. W. (1999). Foreign language study and language awareness. Language Awareness, 8(3/4), 124-142.
Herron, C. (1982). Foreign language learning approaches as metaphors. Modern Language Journal, 66, 235-242.
Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 72, 283-294.
Johnson, S. M. & Nelson, B. M. (2010). Above and beyond the syllabus: Transformation in an adult, foreign language classroom. Language Awareness,19(1), 35-50.
Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Liao, P. (2006). EFL learners’ beliefs about and strategy use of translation in English learning. RELC Journal, 37(2), 191-215.
Martinez, M., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. (2001). Metaphors as blueprint of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education,17(8), 965-977.
McEwan, A. E. (2007). Do metaphors matter in higher education? Journal of College and Character, 8(2), 20-28.
McGrath, I. (2006). Teachers’ and learners images for coursebooks. ELT Journal,60(2), 171-180.
Mercer, S. (2011). The self as a complex dynamic system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 57-82.
Nayak, N. P., & Gibbs, R. W. (1990). Conceptual knowledge in the interpretationof idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(3), 315-330.
Oxford, R. (2001). The bleached bone of a story: Learners’ construction of language teachers. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learners contribution to language learning (pp. 86-111). London: Longman.
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor: An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science and Education,14(6), 535-557.
Schaw, G., & Bruning, R. (1996). Readers’ implicit model of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 290-305.
Solso, R., Maclin, O., & Maclin, M. (2008). Cognitive psychology. Boston: Pearson.
Svalberg, A. M-L. (2005). Consciousness-raising activities in some Lebanese English language classrooms: Teacher perceptions and learner engagement.Language Awareness, 14(2/3), 170-190.
Svalberg, A. M-L. (2007). Language awareness and language learning.Language Teaching, 40(4), 287-308.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.