Teaching the English active and passive voice with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study
PDF

Keywords

pedagogical application of cognitive grammar
active and passive voice
reference point model
subject
topic

How to Cite

Bielak, J., Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2013). Teaching the English active and passive voice with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 581–619. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.4.7

Number of views: 1030


Number of downloads: 656

Abstract

Functionally-oriented linguistic theories, such as cognitive grammar (CG), offer nuanced descriptions of the meanings and uses of grammatical features. A simplified characterization of the semantics of the English active and passive voice grounded in CG terms and based on the reference point model is presented, as it is the basis of the instructional treatment offered to one of the groups in the quasiexperimental study reported in the paper. The study compares the effects of feature- focused grammatical instruction covering the form and meaning/use of the English voices based on CG with those of teaching based on standard pedagogical grammar rules. The results point to relatively high effectiveness of both instructional options in fostering the use of the target structures in both more controlled and more spontaneous performance, with traditional instruction being more successful than that based on CG with respect to the latter. A possible explanation of this superiority is that the subset of the participants (n = 27) exposed to the traditional explanations found them simple and easy to apply, contrary to the situation in the other group.
https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.4.7
PDF

References

Achard, M. (2004). Grammatical instruction in the Natural Approach: A Cognitive Grammar view. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 165-194). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Achard, M. (2008). Teaching construal: Cognitive pedagogical grammar. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 432-455). New York: Routledge.

Bielak, J. (2007). Applying Cognitive Grammar in the classroom: Teaching English possessives. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Exploring focus on form in language teaching (Special issue of Studies in Pedagogy and Fine Arts) (pp. 113-133). Poznań: Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Adam Mickiewicz University.

Bielak, J. (2012). Cognitive grammar in the service of teaching linguistic flexibility and creativity. In H. Lankiewicz & E. Wąsikiewicz-Firlej (Eds.), Informed teaching: Premises of modern foreign language pedagogy (pp. 155-173). Piła: Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Staszica.

Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2011). Teaching English tense and aspect with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 365-400.

Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2013). Applying Cognitive Grammar in the foreign language classroom: Teaching English tense and aspect. Heidelberg: Springer.

Bielak, J., Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (in press). Testing the meaning and use of grammar: Beyond grammatical accuracy. In Ł. Salski & W. Szubko-Sitarek (Eds.), Perspectives on foreign language learning. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

De Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 726-755). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499-533.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97- 113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 119-138). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

DeKeyser, R. M., & Juffs, A. (2005). Cognitive considerations in L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 437-454). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Oxford: Blackwell.

Eastwood, J. (1999). Oxford practice grammar (2nd ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 31-64). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J, & Reinders, H. (Eds.) (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New York: Routledge.

Geeraerts, D. (Ed.) (2006). Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Janssen, T., & Redeker, G. (Eds.) (1999). Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Król-Markefka, A. (2010). Metalinguistic knowledge and the accurate use of English articles: The effects of applying Cognitive Grammar in second language teaching (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). The grammar of choice. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching (pp. 103-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring.

Boston: Thomson and Heinle.

Liamkina, O., & Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2012). Grammar dilemma: Teaching grammar as a resource for making meaning. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 270-289. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01333.x

Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak. M. (2012). Production-oriented and comprehension-based grammar teaching in the foreign language classroom. Heidelberg: Springer.

Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. Routledge: New York.

Niemeier, S., & Reif, M. (2008). Making progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching in the German EFL classroom. In S. de Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp. 325-356). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Pawlak, M. (2012). Variability in the use of implicit knowledge: The effect of task, level and linguistic form. In E. Piechurska-Kuciel & L. Piasecka (Eds.),Variability an stability in foreign and second language learning contexts (pp. 279-298). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Ray, W. J. (2012). Methods: Toward a science of behavior and experience (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Turewicz, K. (2000). Applicability of Cognitive Grammar as a foundation of pedagogical/reference grammar. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu łódzkiego.

Tyler, A. (2008). Cognitive linguistics and second language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 456-488). New York: Routledge.

Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). The relation between experience, conceptual structure and meaning: non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching. In M. Pütz, S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition (pp. 63-105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Tyler, A., Mueller, C. M., & Ho, V. (2010). Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning: The English modals. In J. Littlemore & C. Juchem-Grundmann (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics in second language learning and teaching (AILA Review 23) (pp. 31-49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

White, B. J. (2012) A conceptual approach to the instruction of phrasal verbs. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 419-438. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01365.x

Williams, L., Abraham, L. B., & Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2013). Using conceptbased instruction in the L2 classroom: Perspectives from current and future language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 17, 363-381. doi: 10.1177/1362168813482950