Spoken grammar awareness raising: Does it affect the listening ability of Iranian EFL learners?

Main Article Content

Mojgan Rashtchi
Mahnaz Afzali


Advances in spoken corpora analysis have brought about new insights into language pedagogy and have led to an awareness of the characteristics of spoken language. Current findings have shown that grammar of spoken language is different from written language. However, most listening and speaking materials are concocted based on written grammar and lack core spoken language features. The aim of the present study was to explore the question whether awareness of spoken grammar features could affect learners’ comprehension of real-life conversations. To this end, 45 university students in two intact classes participated in a listening course employing corpus-based materials. The instruction of the spoken grammar features to the experimental group was done overtly through awareness raising tasks, whereas the control group, though exposed to the same materials, was not provided with such tasks for learning the features. The results of the independent samples t tests revealed that the learners in the experimental group comprehended everyday conversations much better than those in the control group. Additionally, the highly positive views of spoken grammar held by the learners, which was elicited by means of a retrospective questionnaire, were generally comparable to those reported in the literature.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Mojgan Rashtchi, Islamic Azad University

Mojgan Rashtchi is Associate Professor in the TEFL Department at Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Iran. She has published several articles in the field of language teaching and learning both in Iran and internationally. She has also published a number of books on teaching English to children and adults. Her main areas of interest include first language acquisition, critical thinking, philosophy for children, and language teaching methodology.

Mahnaz Afzali, Islamic Azad University

Mahnaz Afzali has obtained her MA in TEFL from Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Iran, and is a secondary school teacher. She has been teaching English to young learners for five years and her research interests include language teaching and young learners, language teaching and the related strategies, and classroom assessment.


  1. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
  2. Brazil, D. (1995). A grammar of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Brown, G. (1990). Listening to spoken English (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
  4. Brown, J. D. (2005). Testing in language programs. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Carter, R. (1998). Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication, and culture. ELT Journal, 52, 43-5.
  7. Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1995). Grammar and spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 16, 141-158.
  8. Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Exploring spoken English. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
  9. Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: Spoken and written English grammar and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  11. Cook, G. (1998). The uses of reality: A reply to Ronald Carter. ELT Journal, 52, 57-63.
  12. Cullen, R., & Kuo, I. V. (2007). Spoken grammar and ELT course materials: A missing link? TESOL Quarterly, 41, 361-386.
  13. Goh, C. (2009). Perspectives on spoken grammar. ELT Journal, 63, 303-312.
  14. Johns, T. (1994). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 293-313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Kuo, I. V. (2006). Addressing the issue of teaching English as a lingua franca. ELT Journal, 60, 213-221.
  16. Kuo, I. V. (2007). A response to Cem Alptekin. ELT Journal, 61, 269-271.
  17. Leech, G. (1998). English grammar in conversation [Language Learning and Computers discussion group]. Retrieved from http://www.tuchemnitz.dephil/ english/chairs/linguist/real/independent/llc/Conference1998/ Papers/Leech/ Leech.html
  18. Leech, G. (2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning, 50, 675-724.
  19. Long, M. (1996). Authenticity and learning potential in L2 classroom discourse. In M. Jacobs (Ed.), Language classrooms of tomorrow: Issues and re-sponses (pp. 148-169). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
  20. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London: Longman.
  21. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1995). Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it? ELT Journal, 49, 207-218.
  22. McCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H. (2006a). Touchstone level 3 stu-dent’s book [With self-study audio CD/CD-ROM]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. McCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H. (2006b). Touchstone level 4 stu-dent’s book [With self-study audio CD/CD-ROM]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Mumford, S. (2009). An analysis of spoken grammar: The case for production. ELT Journal, 63, 137-144.
  25. O’Keeffe, R. (2009). Spoken grammar: Go with the flow. Humanizing Language Teaching, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.hltmag.co.uk/feb09/idea.htm
  26. O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Lan-guage use and language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Prodromou, L. (1996). Correspondence. ELT Journal, 50, 371-73.
  28. Rajagopalan, K. (2004). The concept of ‘World English’ and its implication for ELT. ELT Journal, 58, 111-117.
  29. Rost, M. (2002).Teaching and researching listening. London: Pearson.
  30. Rost, M. (2006) Areas of research that influence L2 listening instruction. In P. Jordens (Ed.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 47-74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  31. Ruhlemann, C. (2008). A register approach to teaching conversation: Farewell to standard English? Applied Linguistics, 29, 672-693.
  32. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance and collocation. Oxford: Oxford Univer-sity Press.
  33. Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
  34. Summers, D., & M. Rundell (Eds.). (1995). Longman dictionary of contemporary English. London: Longman.
  35. Timmis, I. (2002). Native-speaker norms and international English: A classroom view. ELT Journal, 56, 240-249.
  36. Timmis, I. (2005). Towards a framework for teaching spoken grammar. ELT Journal, 59, 117-125.
  37. Wendy, Y., & Lam, K. (2002). Raising students’ awareness of the features of real-world listening input. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 48-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 377-389.
  39. Widdowson, H. G. (2000). On the limitations of applied linguistics, Applied Linguistics, 21, 2-25.