Advances in spoken corpora analysis have brought about new insights into language pedagogy and have led to an awareness of the characteristics of spoken language. Current findings have shown that grammar of spoken language is different from written language. However, most listening and speaking materials are concocted based on written grammar and lack core spoken language features. The aim of the present study was to explore the question whether awareness of spoken grammar features could affect learners’ comprehension of real-life conversations. To this end, 45 university students in two intact classes participated in a listening course employing corpus-based materials. The instruction of the spoken grammar features to the experimental group was done overtly through awareness raising tasks, whereas the control group, though exposed to the same materials, was not provided with such tasks for learning the features. The results of the independent samples t tests revealed that the learners in the experimental group comprehended everyday conversations much better than those in the control group. Additionally, the highly positive views of spoken grammar held by the learners, which was elicited by means of a retrospective questionnaire, were generally comparable to those reported in the literature.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
Brazil, D. (1995). A grammar of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, G. (1990). Listening to spoken English (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Brown, J. D. (2005). Testing in language programs. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R. (1998). Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication, and culture. ELT Journal, 52, 43-5.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1995). Grammar and spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 16, 141-158.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Exploring spoken English. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: Spoken and written English grammar and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cook, G. (1998). The uses of reality: A reply to Ronald Carter. ELT Journal, 52, 57-63.
Cullen, R., & Kuo, I. V. (2007). Spoken grammar and ELT course materials: A missing link? TESOL Quarterly, 41, 361-386.
Goh, C. (2009). Perspectives on spoken grammar. ELT Journal, 63, 303-312.
Johns, T. (1994). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 293-313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuo, I. V. (2006). Addressing the issue of teaching English as a lingua franca. ELT Journal, 60, 213-221.
Kuo, I. V. (2007). A response to Cem Alptekin. ELT Journal, 61, 269-271.
Leech, G. (1998). English grammar in conversation [Language Learning and Computers discussion group]. Retrieved from http://www.tuchemnitz.dephil/ english/chairs/linguist/real/independent/llc/Conference1998/ Papers/Leech/ Leech.html
Leech, G. (2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning, 50, 675-724.
Long, M. (1996). Authenticity and learning potential in L2 classroom discourse. In M. Jacobs (Ed.), Language classrooms of tomorrow: Issues and re-sponses (pp. 148-169). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London: Longman.
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1995). Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it? ELT Journal, 49, 207-218.
McCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H. (2006a). Touchstone level 3 stu-dent’s book [With self-study audio CD/CD-ROM]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H. (2006b). Touchstone level 4 stu-dent’s book [With self-study audio CD/CD-ROM]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mumford, S. (2009). An analysis of spoken grammar: The case for production. ELT Journal, 63, 137-144.
O’Keeffe, R. (2009). Spoken grammar: Go with the flow. Humanizing Language Teaching, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.hltmag.co.uk/feb09/idea.htm
O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Lan-guage use and language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Prodromou, L. (1996). Correspondence. ELT Journal, 50, 371-73.
Rajagopalan, K. (2004). The concept of ‘World English’ and its implication for ELT. ELT Journal, 58, 111-117.
Rost, M. (2002).Teaching and researching listening. London: Pearson.
Rost, M. (2006) Areas of research that influence L2 listening instruction. In P. Jordens (Ed.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 47-74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruhlemann, C. (2008). A register approach to teaching conversation: Farewell to standard English? Applied Linguistics, 29, 672-693.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance and collocation. Oxford: Oxford Univer-sity Press.
Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Summers, D., & M. Rundell (Eds.). (1995). Longman dictionary of contemporary English. London: Longman.
Timmis, I. (2002). Native-speaker norms and international English: A classroom view. ELT Journal, 56, 240-249.
Timmis, I. (2005). Towards a framework for teaching spoken grammar. ELT Journal, 59, 117-125.
Wendy, Y., & Lam, K. (2002). Raising students’ awareness of the features of real-world listening input. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 48-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 377-389.
Widdowson, H. G. (2000). On the limitations of applied linguistics, Applied Linguistics, 21, 2-25.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.