Keywords
positivist research
reductionist research
complex systems
humanistic perspective
How to Cite
Number of views: 564
Number of downloads: 395
Abstract
In this paper I give an overview of recent developments in the L2 motivation field, in particular the movement away from quantitative, questionnaire-based methodologies toward smaller-scale qualitative studies incorporating concepts from complexity theory. While complexity theory provides useful concepts for exploring motivation in new ways, it has nothing to say about ethics, morality, ideology, politics, power or educational purpose. Furthermore, calls for its use come primarily from researchers from the quantitative tradition whose aim in importing this paradigm from the physical sciences appears to be to conceptualize and model motivation more accurately. The endeavor therefore remains a fundamentally positivist one. Rather than being embraced as a self-contained methodology, I argue that complexity theory should be used cautiously and prudently alongside methods grounded in other philosophical traditions. Possibilities abound, but here I suggest one possible multifaceted approach combining complexity theory, a humanisticconception of motivation, and a critical perspective.
References
Allport, G. W. (1962). The general and the unique in psychological science. Journal of Personality, 30, 405-422.
Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 525-545.
Bolster, A. (2009). Continuity or a fresh start? A case-study of motivation in MFL as transition, KS2-3. Language Learning Journal, 37(2), 233-254.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Longman.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009a, September). The antecedents of task behaviour: A dynamic systems account of task motivation. Paper presented at the 3rd Biennial International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching, Lancaster. Presentation retrieved from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/events/tblt2009/presentations.htm
Dörnyei, Z. (2009b). The English language and the Word of God. In M. S. Wong & A. S. Canagarajah (Eds.), Christian and critical English language educators in dialogue: Pedagogical and ethical dilemmas (pp. 154-157). New York: Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z. (2012). Researching complex dynamic systems: 'Retrodictive qualitative modelling' in the language classroom. Language Teaching. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000516
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 558.
Gaddis, J. L. (2002). The landscape of history: How historians map the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Hesse, H. (2000). Demien. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Kubanyiova, M. (2009). Possible selves in language teacher development. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 314-332). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Kubota, R. (1998). Ideologies of English in Japan. World Englishes, 17(3), 295-306.
Lamb, M. (2009). Situating the L2 self: Two Indonesian school learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 229-247). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
Maslow, A. H. (1966). The psychology of science: A reconnaissance. Chapel Hill, NC: Maurice Basset.
Mason, M. (2008). Complexity theory and the philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 4-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00412.x
McDonough, S. (2002). Applied linguistics in language education. London: Arnold.
Mercer, S. (2012). The self as a complex system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 57-82.
Midgely, M. (2011). The myths we live by. New York: Routledge.
Morrison, K. (2008). Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 19-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00394.x
Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 409-429.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pigott, J. D. (2009). Toward classroom-friendly models of motivation: A data-led investigation into student perceptions of motivating and demotivating classroom factors, and the relationship between student orientations and preferred classroom activities. Asian EFL Journal (thesis section). Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/thesis.php
Pigott, J. D. (2013). Motivation and complex systems theory: An exploratory view of the motivation of four Japanese university students. OnCUE Journal, 6(2), 27-47.
Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method - why? TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161-176.
Richards, K., Ross, S. J., & Seedhouse, P. (2011). Research methods for applied language studies: An advanced resource book for students: New York: Routledge.
Rind, D. (1999). Complexity and climate science. Science, 284(5411), 105-107.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Rogers, C. R., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Seargeant, P. (2009). The idea of English in Japan: Ideology and the evolution of a global language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Seargeant, P. (2012). The symbolic meaning of visual English in the social landscape of Japan. In P. Seargent (Ed.), English in Japan in the era of globalization (pp. 187-204). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. (2007). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sikes, P. (2010). ‘Truth’ and ‘Lies’ revisited. British Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 257-270. doi: 10.1080/01411920050000980
Spolsky, B. (2000). Language motivation revisited. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 157-169.
Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations, and classroom practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ushioda, E. (2001). Language learning at university: Exploring the role of motivational thinking. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 93-125). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215-228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ushioda, E. (2012). Motivation: L2 learning as a special case? In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 58-73). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Van Geert, P. (2007). Dynamic systems in second language learning: Some general methodological reflections. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 47-49.
Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Massachusetts, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.