Keywords
computer-assisted language learning (CALL)
learner autonomy
learning beyond the classroom
How to Cite
Number of views: 580
Number of downloads: 498
Abstract
This article examines the relevance of modern technology for the development of learner autonomy in the process of learning English as a foreign language. Computer-assisted language learning and computer mediated communication (CMC) appear to be particularly conducive to fostering autonomous learning, as they naturally incorporate many elements of autonomy that give learners control over and responsibility for their own learning, such as choosing the materials used, managing their contact with various genres and types of interaction, often in authentic contexts, and evaluating their own progress, measured through their success in understanding and conveying meanings. However, providing access to language resources does not automatically lead to the development of autonomy, as much depends on other factors, such as the learners’ level or previous experience in learner training. The present study investigated whether advanced learners of English made use of out-of-class CMC engagement for the purpose of learning English autonomously. The results indicate that most of the participants were eager to use CMC opportunities to deliberately practice their English, although, quite naturally, leisure and social reasons for using CMC predominated. The expressed willingness to deliberately focus on practicing English during beyond-theclassroom meaning-oriented online interactions confirms the great potential of CMC as an autonomy enhancement tool.References
Abraham, L. B., & Williams, L. (2011). Expanding discourse options through computer-mediated communication: Guiding learners toward autonomy. Foreign Language Annals, 44, 626-645.
Alm, A. (2006). CALL for autonomy, competence and relatedness: Motivating language learning environments in Web 2.0. JALT CALL Journal, 2, 29-38.
Arikan, A., & Bakla, A. (2011). Learner autonomy online: Stories from a blogging experience. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 240-251). Gaziantep: Zirve University. Retrieved from http://ilac2010.zirve.edu.tr
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Benson, P. (2006). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40, 21-40.
Benson, P. (2011a). What’s new in autonomy? The Language Teacher, 35, 15-18.
Benson, P. (2011b). Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In P. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp. 7-16). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Blin, F. (2004). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL, 16, 377-395.
Collentine, K. (2011). Learner autonomy in a task-based 3D world and production. Language Learning & Technology, 15, 50-67.
Darasawang, P., & Reinders, H. (2010). Encouraging autonomy with an online language support system. CALL-EJ Online, 11. Retrieved from http://callej.org/journal/11-2/darasawang_reinders.html
Eneau, J., & Develotte, C. (2012). Working together online: Analysis of learners’ perceptions of their online learning experience. ReCALL, 24, 3-19.
Esch, E., & Zächner, C. (2000). The contribution of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on language learning environments or the mastery of the secret agent. ReCALL, 12, 5-18.
Gao, X., & Zhang, L.J. (2011). Joining forces for synergy: Agency and metacognition as interrelated theoretical perspectives on learner autonomy. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 25-41). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies. Autonomous language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15, 4-11.
Hafner, C., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for Science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15, 68-86.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Hyland, F. (2004). Learning autonomously: Contextualising out-of-class English language learning. Language Awareness, 13, 180-202.
Jarvis, H. (2012). Computers and learner autonomy: Trends and issues. London: British Council.
Kaur, R., & Sidhu, G. (2010). Learner autonomy via asynchronous online interactions: a Malaysian perspective. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology 6, 88-100.
Kaur, R., Singh, G., & Embi, M. A. (2006). Learner autonomy through computer mediated communication. Jurnal Teknologi, 46, 99-112.
Lee, L. (2011). Blogging: Promoting learner autonomy and intercultural competence through study abroad. Language Learning & Technology, 5, 87-109.
Little, D. (2000). Autonomy and autonomous learners. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 69-72). New York: Routledge.
Little, D. (2007). Introduction: Reconstructing learner and teacher autonomy in language education. In A. Barfield & S. H. Brown (Eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: Inquiry and innovation (pp. 1-12). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Little, D. (2009). Language learner autonomy and the European Language Portfolio: Two L2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42, 222-233.
Luke, C. (2006). Fostering learner autonomy in a technology-enhanced, inquiry-based foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 71-86.
Luzón, M. J., & Ruiz-Madrid, M. N. (2008). Learning to learn in a digital context: Language learning webtasks for an autonomising “wreading” competence. CORELL: Computer Resources for Language Learning, 2, 28-45.
Markiewicz, W. (2008). E-learning jako narzędzie w rozwijaniu autonomii ucznia. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Autonomia w nauce języka obcego – co osiągnęliśmy i dokąd zmierzamy? (pp. 335-343). Poznań: Wydział Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny UAM w Poznaniu and Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Koninie.
Ng, S., Confessore, G., Yusoff, Z., Aziz, N., & Lajiz, N. (2011). Learner autonomy and academic performance among undergraduate students. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 1, 669-679.
Raby, F. (2007). A triangular approach to motivation in Computer Assisted Autonomous Language Learning (CAALL). ReCALL, 19, 181-201.
Reinders, H. (2011). Materials development for learning beyond the classroom. In P. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp. 175-189). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2011). Learner autonomy and new learning environments. Language Learning & Technology, 15, 1-3.
Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 487-506.
Shucart, S. A., Mishina, T., Takahashi, M., & Enokizono, T. (2008). The CALL lab as a facilitator for autonomous learning. In F. Zhang & B. Barber (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer-enhanced language acquisition and learning (pp. 483-495). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Ushioda, E. (2000). Tandem language learning via e-mail: From motivation to autonomy. ReCALL, 12, 121-128.
Ushioda, E. (2011a). Motivating learners to speak as themselves. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 11-24). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ushioda, E. (2011b). Why autonomy? Insights from motivation theory and research. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5, 221-232.
Villanueva, M. L., Ruiz-Madrid, M. N., & Luzón, M. J. (2010). Learner autonomy in digital environments: Conceptual framework. In M. J. Luzón, M. N. Ruiz-Madrid, & M. L. Villanueva (Eds.), Digital genres, new literacies, and autonomy in language learning (pp. 1-19). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolski, B. (2008). Autonomiczna nauka w globalnej sieci. Czy studenci anglistyki efektywnie wykorzystuja internet do celów edukacyjnych? In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Autonomia w nauce języka obcego – co osiągnęliśmy i dokąd zmierzamy? (pp. 219-232). Poznań: Wydział Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny UAM w Poznaniu and Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Koninie.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.