Keywords
computer anxiety
second language learning
ESL
distance learning
How to Cite
Number of views: 848
Number of downloads: 507
Abstract
This study examined the impact of writing anxiety and computer anxiety on language learning for 45 ESL adult learners enrolled in an English grammar and writing course. Two sections of the course were offered in a traditional classroom setting whereas two others were given in a hybrid form that involved distance learning. Contrary to previous research, writing anxiety showed no correlation with learning performance, whereas computer anxiety only yielded a positive correlation with performance in the case of classroom learners. There were no significant differences across learning environments on any measures. These observations are discussed in light of the role computer technologies now play in our society as well as the merging of socio-demographic profiles between classroom and distance learners. Our data suggest that comparisons of profiles between classroom and distance learners may not be an issue worth investigating anymore in language studies, at least in developed countries.References
Aida, Y. (1994). Examination of Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope’s construct of foreign language anxiety: The case of students of Japanese. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 155-168.
Aydin, S. (2011). Internet anxiety among foreign language learners. TechTrends, 55(2), 46-54.
Bailey, K. M. (1983). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In H. W Seliger, & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 67-102). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Bailey, P., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daley, C.E. (2000). Correlates of anxiety at three stages of the foreign language learning process. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(4), 474-490.
Brown, J. D., Robson, G., & Rosenkjar, P. R. (2001). Personality, motivation, anxiety, strategies and language proficiency of Japanese students. Motivation and Second Language Acquisition, 23, 361-398.
Chen, T.-Y., & Chang, G. B. Y. (2004). The relationship between foreign language anxiety and learning difficulties. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 279-290.
Cheng, Y., Horwitz, E., & Schallert, D. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49(3), 417-446.
Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975). Further studies in writing apprehension: SAT scores, success, expectations, willingness to take advanced courses, and sex differences. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 250-256.
Daly, J. A. (1979). Writing apprehension in the classroom: Teacher role expectancies of the apprehensive writer. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 37-45.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998). Meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies. British Medical Journal, 316(7124), 61-66.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1996). Anxiety about foreign language learning among high school women. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 199-212.
Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3(1), 49-59.
Horwitz, E. K. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112-126.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-132.
Hurd, S. (2007). Anxiety and non-anxiety in a distance language learning environment: The distance factor as a modifying influence. System, 35(4), 487-508.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Lu, S.-H. (2010). A correlational study of computer anxiety, second language writing apprehension and Taiwanese college student experiences with word processing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Mississippi.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language learning: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere (pp. 24-45). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1989). Anxiety and second language learning: Towards a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 39, 251-275.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Language anxiety: Its relation to other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language Learning, 41, 513-534.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44, 283-305.
Matsumura, S., & Hann, G. (2004). Computer anxiety and students’ preferred feedback methods in EFL writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 403-415.
Phillips, E. M. (1992). The effects of language anxiety on students’ oral test performance and attitudes. The Modern Language Journal, 76(1), 14-26.
Pichette, F. (2009). Second language anxiety and distance language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 77-93.
Price, M. L. (1988). Anxiety and the foreign language learner: Correlates of foreign language anxiety. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Saade, R. G., & Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8. Retrieved from http://jite.org/documents/Vol8/JITEv8p177-191Saade724.pdf
Schlesinger, H. (1995). The effectiveness of anxiety reduction techniques in the foreign language classroom. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Scovel, T. (1978). The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of the anxiety research. Language Learning, 28, 129-142.
Sieber, J. E., O’Neil, H.F., & Tobias, S. (1977). Anxiety, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Talbot, N. (2011). Méta-analyse: Un outil pertinent dans le cadre d’une recension des écrits. Paper presented at the 79th ACFAS conference, Sherbrooke, Canada, May.
Tobias, S. (1986) Anxiety and cognitive processing of instruction. In R. Schuwarzer (Ed.), Self-related cognition in anxiety and motivation (pp. 35-43). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tuncay, N., & Uzunboylu, H. (2010). Anxiety and resistance in distance learning. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 4, 142-150.
Vogely, A. J. (1998). Listening comprehension anxiety: Students’ reported sources and solutions. Foreign Language Annals, 31, 67-80.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The development of higher mental functions. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37-71). NY: Sharpe.
Wiltse, E. M. (2000). The effects of motivation and anxiety on college students’ use of instructor comments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Wyoming, Laramie. Retrieved from http://uwadmnweb.uwyo.edu/COJO/WILTSE/dissertation.htm.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.