Keywords
digital multimodal composing
writing performance
reading comprehension
vocabulary learning
How to Cite
Number of views: 127
Number of downloads: 29
Abstract
Integrated reading-to-write tasks have been widely used to enhance second language (L2) learners’ writing skills and benefit other areas of L2 learning, such as reading and vocabulary. Although these benefits of integrated tasks have been widely investigated in traditional text-based monomodal writing, few studies have examined pedagogical interventions involving digital multimodal composing (DMC). This study investigates whether and to what extent writing modalities (DMC vs. traditional monomodal writing) in integrated reading-to-write tasks impact writing quality, vocabulary learning, and reading comprehension. Thirty-six English as a foreign language students in China completed either an argumentative monomodal essay or a DMC video-making task, both of which required incorporating key information from an article and presenting their own argument. Students’ writing was assessed using an analytic rubric. A posttest was conducted to assess their reading comprehension (via multiple-choice questions and summary writing) and vocabulary knowledge of words from the source text. Results indicated that the DMC group achieved higher scores in organization (writing quality) and in summary writing (reading comprehension). However, no significant differences were found in other writing scores (content, language use), vocabulary learning, or multiple-choice comprehension.
References
Ajayi, L. (2008). Meaning-making, multimodal representation, and transformative pedagogy: An exploration of meaning construction instructional practices in an ESL high school classroom. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 7(3-4), 206-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15348450802237822
Akoto, M., & Li, M. (2025). Exploring collaborative digital multimodal composition: Interaction patterns and texts in the French as a foreign language context. System, 129, 103583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103583
Casanave, C. P. (2017). Controversies in second language writing: Dilemmas and decisions in research and instruction (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8876881
Cimasko, T., & Shin, D. S. (2017). Multimodal resemiotization and authorial agency in an L2 writing classroom. Written Communication, 34(4), 387-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317727246
Cho, H. (2022). Extensive reading-to-write task outcome, vocabulary learning and Korean EFL students’ perceptions towards task performance: Comparing monomodal and multimodal composing tasks [Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University].
Cho, H., & Kim, Y. (2024). Comparing the characteristics of EFL students’ multimodal composing and traditional monomodal writing: The case of a reading-to-write task. Language Teaching Research, 28(6), 2487-2512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211046740
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
Cumming, A. (2014). Assessing integrated skills. In J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment: Volume I: Ability, contexts, and learners (pp. 216-229). Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla131
Dhanesha, N., & Locke, C. (2024, October 15). Your biggest AI questions, answered. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/ai-effects-questions-concerns
Esmaeili, H. (2002). Integrated reading and writing tasks and ESL students’ reading and writing performance in an English language test. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(4), 599-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.58.4.599
Hafner, C., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44263
Hirvela, A. (2016). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8122864
Jiang, L. (2017). The affordances of digital multimodal composing for EFL learning. ELT Journal, 71(4), 413-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw098
Jiang, L., & Hafner, C. (2025). Digital multimodal composing in L2 classrooms: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 58(4), 528-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000107
Jiang, L., & Luk, J. (2016). Multimodal composing as a learning activity in English classrooms: Inquiring into the sources of its motivational capacity. System, 59, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.04.001
Jung, J. (2020). Effects of content support on integrated reading-writing task performance and incidental vocabulary learning. System, 93, 102288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102288
Kessler, M. (2024). Digital multimodal composing: Connecting theory, research and practice in second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
Kim, Y., & Belcher, D. (2020). Multimodal composing and traditional essays: Linguistic performance and learner perceptions. RELC Journal, 51(1), 86-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220906943
Kim, Y., Belcher, D., & Peyton, C. (2023). Comparing monomodal traditional writing and digital multimodal composing in EAP classrooms: Linguistic performance and writing development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101247
Kim, Y., Kang, S., Nam, Y., & Skalicky, S. (2022). Peer interaction, writing proficiency, and the quality of collaborative digital multimodal composing task: Comparing guided and unguided planning. System, 106, 102722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102722
Knoch, U., & Sitajalabhorn, W. (2013). A closer look at integrated writing tasks: Towards a more focused definition for assessment purposes. Assessing Writing, 18(4), 300-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.003
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Lee, S. Y., Lo, Y. H. G., & Chin, T. C. (2021). Practicing multiliteracies to enhance EFL learners’ meaning making process and language development: A multimodal problem-based approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1-2), 66-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614959
Li, M., & Pham, Q. N. (2025). Three heads are better than one? Digital mul-timodal composition completed collaboratively versus individually. Language Teaching Research, 29(5), 1866-1888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221102536
Mai, S., Ma, S., & Pei, H. (2023, July). A comparative study on the effectiveness of multimodal input and digital multimodal composing on vocabulary learning. In 2023 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 244-248). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET58841.2023.00055
Marino, F. (2025). Digital multimodal composing in an L2 Italian classroom: The effects of digital video projects on students’ development and investment [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida].
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164603
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Nishioka, H. (2016). Analysing language development in a collaborative digital storytelling project: Sociocultural perspectives. System, 62, 39-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.001
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Payant, C., McDonough, K., Uludag, P., & Lindberg, R. (2019). Predicting integrated writing task performance: Source comprehension, prewriting planning, and individual differences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 87-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.06.001
Qu, W. (2017). For L2 writers, it is always the problem of the language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 92-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.10.007
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.3) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Shin, D., Cimasko, T., & Yi, Y. (2020). Development of metalanguage for multimodal composing: A case study of an L2 writer’s design of multimedia texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100714
Shin, S. Y., & Ewert, D. (2015). What accounts for integrated reading-to-write task scores? Language Testing, 32(2), 259-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214560257
Vandommele, G., Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., & De Maeyer, S. (2017). In-school and out-of-school multimodal writing as an L2 writing resource for beginner learners of Dutch. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 23-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.010
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13
Xu, Y. (2023). Investigating the effects of digital multimodal composing on Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance: A quasi-experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 785-805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1945635
Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012
Zalazar, M. L. (2025). Digital multimodal composing versus traditional monomodal writing: A look at the Spanish imperfect subjunctive from a process and product perspective. System, 132, 103718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103718
License
Copyright (c) 2026 HeeJoon Choi, Yingliang Liu, YouJin Kim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.