Abstract
The multimodal turn in second language (L2) writing has fundamentally reshaped how writing and writing instruction are conceptualized in increasingly digitalized environments. This coda synthesizes the conceptual and empirical contributions of the special issue, arguing that they collectively signal the emergence of a new ecology of multimodal L2 writing and L2 learning. It discusses the papers in two complementary sections. The first examines how the special issue reframes the ecology of L2 writing by positioning digital multimodal composing as an integral component of contemporary L2 writing and language learning. The second highlights how the ecology is expanded through the integration of multimodal feedback, assessment, and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), emphasizing their interconnected roles in supporting multimodal meaning-making and language development. Building on these contributions, the coda identifies several priorities for the next generation of research, with particular attention to sustainable curricular innovation that embeds multimodal composing and multimodal feedback into language education rather than treating them as isolated instructional practices. It argues that the long-term impact of multimodal research will depend not only on technological innovation but also on the development of coherent pedagogical frameworks, valid assessment practices, and teacher expertise capable of supporting multimodal learning in diverse instructional contexts.
References
Belcher, D. (2017). On becoming facilitators of multimodal composing and digital design. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 80-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.10.004
Bygate, M. (Ed.) (2018). Learning language through task repetition. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. (2014). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing – an introduction. In H. Byrnes & R. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning-Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 1-23). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.01byr
Carless, D. (2013). Innovation in language teaching and learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-4). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0540
Cimasko, T., & Shin, D. S. (2017). Multimodal resemiotization and authorial agency in an L2 writing classroom. Written Communication, 34(4), 387-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317727246
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2015). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724
Crosthwaite, P., & Sun, S. (2025). Generative AI and L2 written feedback studies: A scoping review. RELC Journal, 57(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251386530
D’Angelo, L. (2016). The academic poster genre: Friend or foe? In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 392-402). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657455-36
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2016). Supporting second language writing using multimodal feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 58-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12183
González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2014). Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.6
Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655-685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.138
Hafner, C., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44263
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Introduction to functional grammar. Longman.
Jewitt, C. (2005). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. Routledge.
Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2003). Multimodal literacy. Peter Lang.
Jiang, L. (2022). Facilitating EFL students’ civic participation through digital multimodal composing. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 102-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1942032
Jiang, L., & Hafner, C. (2025). Digital multilingual composing in L2 classrooms: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 58(4), 528-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000107
Jiang, L., Lee, I., & Yu, S. (2024). Conceptualizing multimodal feedback literacy for L2 writing teachers in the digital age. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34, 1479-1496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12578
Jiang, L., Yang, M., & Yu, S. (2020). Chinese ethnic minority students’ investment in English learning empowered by digital multimodal composing. TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 954-979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.566
Kang, S., & Kim, Y. (2023). EFL adolescent learners’ perceptions of digital multimodal composing tasks and task outcomes: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 340-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12473
Kessler, M. (2024). Digital multimodal composing: Connecting theory, research and practice in second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
Kim, Y. (2025, May). L2 writing, monomodal and multimodal perspectives, task variables and effects on L2 processes and products. L2 writing research seminar, Murcia, Spain.
Kim, Y., Belcher, D., & Peyton, C. (2023). Comparing monomodal traditional writing and digital multimodal composing in EAP classrooms: Linguistic performance and writing development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101247
Kim, Y., Belcher, D., & Peyton, C. (2026). Exploring digital multimodal ensembles and monomodal expository essays: From author performance to reader perspectives. TESOL Quarterly. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70175
Kress, G. (2004). Reading images: Multimodality, representation and new media. Information Design Journal, 12(2), 110-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.12.2.03kre
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Hodder Arnold.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728
Lim, J., & Kessler, M. (2022). Directions for future research on SLA, L2 writing, and multimodality. In R. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 325-338). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-33
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
Long, M. H., & Ahmadian, M. J. (2022). The origins and growth of task-based language teaching. In M. J., Ahmadian & M. H. Long (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching (pp. xxv-xxvii). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868327.001
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
Manchón, R. M. (2011) (Ed.). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31
Manchón, R. M. (Ed.). (2020). Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, 41, 27-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5926/arepj1962.41.0_27
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Pearson Education.
Qu, W. (2017). For L2 writers, it is always the problem of the language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 92-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.10.007
Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2022). The research-practice dialogue in second language learning and teaching: Past, present, and future. Modern Language Journal, 106(3), 509-527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12791
Sato, M., Loewen, S., & Pastushenkov, D. (2021). “Who is my research for?”: Researcher perceptions of the research–practice relationship. Applied Linguistics, 43(4), 625-652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab079
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Shin, D. (2018). Multimodal mediation and argumentative writing: A case study of a multilingual writer’s metalanguage awareness development. In R. Harman (Ed.), Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics (pp. 225-242). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9_11
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 158-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.50.1.158
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In K. Van den Branden, M. By-gate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 1-13). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.1.02van
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zhang, E., & Yu, S. (Eds.) (2024). Assessing L2 digital multimodal composing competence. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003475729
Zhang, M., Akoto, M., & Li, M. (2021). Digital multimodal composing in post-secondary L2 settings: A review of the empirical landscape. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 694-721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1942068
License
Copyright (c) 2026 YouJin Kim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.
