Circadian rhythms and second language performance

Main Article Content

Kees de Bot
Fang Fang

Abstract

Human behavior is not constant over the hours of the day, and there are considerable individual differences. Some people raise early and go to bed early and have their peek performance early in the day (“larks”) while others tend to go to bed late and get up late and have their best performance later in the day (“owls”). In this contribution we report on three projects on the role of chronotype (CT) in language processing and learning. The first study (de Bot, 2013) reports on the impact of CT on language learning aptitude and word learning. The second project was reported in Fang (2015) and looks at CT and executive functions, in particular inhibition as measured by variants of the Stroop test. The third project aimed at assessing lexical access in L1 and L2 at preferred and non-preferred times of the day. The data suggest that there are effects of CT on language learning and processing. There is a small effect of CT on language aptitude and a stronger effect of CT on lexical access in the first and second language. The lack of significance for other tasks is mainly caused by the large interindividual and intraindividual variation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Kees de Bot, University of Pannonia, Veszprém Fang Fang got her MA degree (cum laude) in applied linguistics from the University of Groningen, the Netherlands in 2015. Now she is working as a customer service executive at Booking.com. She intends to build a career in the travel industry.

c.l.j.de.bot@rug.nl

Kees de Bot got his PhD from the University of Nijmegen in the Netherlands. His interests range from bilingual processing to language attrition and language development over the lifespan, language and aging and circadian rhythm in language learning. His main research topic now is what counts as evidence in applied linguistics. He has published in the main leading journals in the field of applied linguistics and published a book on the history of applied linguistics with Routledge in 2015. He recently retired from the University of Groningen, the Netherlands and is now working at the University of Pannonia in Hungary.

Fang Fang, University of Pannonia, Veszprém

ff19881129xx@outlook.com

References

  1. Blatter, K., & Cajochen, C. (2007). Circadian rhythms in cognitive performance: Methodological constraints, protocols, theoretical underpinnings. Physiology & Behavior, 90, 196-208.
  2. de Bot, K. (2013). Circadian rhythms and second language development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 142-155. doi: 10.1177/1367006913489201.
  3. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589-630). Oxford: Blackwell.
  5. Díaz-Morales, J. F. (2007). Morning and evening-types: Exploring their personality styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 769-778.
  6. Dijk, D. J., & von Schantz, M. (2005). Timing and consolidation of human sleep, wakefulness, and performance by a symphony of oscillators. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 20(4), 279-290.
  7. Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Rugen & C. E. Business, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885)
  8. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525-551). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  10. Fang, F. (2015). Circadian Rhythm and second language acquisition (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
  11. Farrell, A., Sood, A., Dewsnap, B., & Schmitt, J. (2013). Student morningness-eveningness type and performance: Does class timing matter? In S. Sezgin, E. Karaosmanoglu, & A. B. Elmadag Bas (Eds.), EMAC 2013 : 42nd annual EMAC conference: Lost in translation.
  12. Giampietro, M., & Cavallera, G. M. (2007). Morning and evening types and creative thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(3), 453-463.
  13. Hahn, C., Cowell, J. M., Wiprzycka, U. J., Goldstein, D., Ralph, M., Hasher, L., & Zelazo, P. D. (2012). Circadian rhythms in executive function during the transition to adolescence: The effect of synchrony between chronotype and time of day. Developmental Science, 15(3), 408-416.
  14. Hogan, M. J., Kelly, C. A., Verrier, D., Newell, J., Hasher, L., & Robertson, I. H. (2009). Optimal time-of-day and consolidation of learning in younger and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 35(1), 107-128.
  15. Kreitzman, L., & Foster, R. (2011). The rhythms of life: The biological clocks that control the daily lives of every living thing. London: Profile Books.
  16. May, C. P., & Hasher, L. (1998). Synchrony effects in inhibitory control over thought and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 363-379.
  17. Monsch, A. U., Bondi, M. W., Butters, N., Salmon, D. P., Katzman, R., & Thal, L. J. (1992). Comparisons of verbal fluency tasks in the detection of dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of Neurology, 49(12), 1253-1258.
  18. Portocarrero, J. S., Burright, R. G., & Donovick, P. J. (2007).Vocabulary and verbal fluency of bilingual and monolingual college students. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 415-422.
  19. Roenneberg, T., Wirz-Justice, A., & Merrow, M. (2003). Life between clocks: Daily temporal patterns of human chronotypes. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 18(1), 80-90.
  20. Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., & Santisi, M. (2002). Stroop effects in Spanish/English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(6), 819-827.
  21. Schmidt, C., Collette, F., Cajochen, C., & Peigneux, P. (2007). A time to think: Circadian rhythms in human cognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(7), 755-789.