Language aptitude: Desirable trait or acquirable attribute?

Main Article Content

David Singleton


The traditional definition of language aptitude sees it as “an individual’s initial state of readiness and capacity for learning a foreign language, and probable facility in doing so given the presence of motivation and opportunity” (Carroll, 1981, p. 86). This conception portrays language aptitude as a trait, in the sense of exhibiting stability over long periods of time and being immune to training. The trait view of language aptitude tends towards the notion that it is innate, and indeed language aptitude has often been associated with the popular notion of a “gift for languages” (cf. Rosenthal, 1996, p. 59). The view of language aptitude as an innate trait has, however, long been questioned (see e.g., Neufeld, 1978). Recently, this questioning has intensified (see Singleton, 2014), especially since the development of a widespread consensus that working memory needs to be recognized as an important component of language aptitude (see Wen, 2016). Working memory was also once thought of as a trait, but is now recognized as susceptible to the influence of experience and instruction (see e.g., Williams, 2012). The present paper will track the trajectory of the above theoretical discussion and will explore the implications of the stage it has now reached.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Author Biography

David Singleton, University of Pannonia, Veszprém State University of Applied Sciences, Konin, Poland

David Singleton is Emeritus Fellow at Trinity College Dublin, and Professor at the University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary and at the State University of Applied Sciences, Konin, Poland. He served as Secretary General of the International Association of Applied Linguistics and as President of the European Second Language Association. His publications focus on cross-linguistic influence, the lexicon, the age factor in language acquisition and multilingualism. He is co-author of Key Topics in Second Language Acquisition and Beyond Age Effects in Instructional L2 Learning (2017, Multilingual Matters), and co-editor of the Multilingual Matters SLA book series. In 2015 he received the EUROSLA Distinguished Scholar Award.


  1. Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481-509. doi:
  2. Adi-Japha, E., Berberich-Artzi, J., & Libnawi, A. (2010). Cognitive flexibility in drawings of bilingual children. Child Development, 81(5), 1356-1366.
  3. Au, J., Buschkuehl, M., Duncan, G. J., & Jaeggi, S. M. (in press). There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is NOT effective: A reply to Melby-Lervåg and Hulme (2015). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 331-337.
  4. Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 366-377.
  5. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417-423.
  6. Baddeley, A.D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189-208.
  7. Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 47-90). New York: Academic Press.
  9. Blom, E., Küntay, A. C., Messer, M., Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P. (2014). The benefits of being bilingual: Working memory in bilingual Turkish-Dutch children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 128, 105-119.
  10. Bolibaugh, C., & Foster, P. (2013). Memory-based aptitude for nativelike selection: The role of phonological short-term memory. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 203-228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  11. Bunting, M. F., & Engle, R. (2015). Foreword. In Z. Wen, M. Mota, & A. McNeill E. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. xvii-xxiii). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  12. Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2(1), 5-14.
  13. Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83-118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  14. Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test: MLAT; manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
  15. Chan E., Skehan, P., & Gong, G. (2011). Working memory, phonemic coding ability and foreign language aptitude: Potential for construction of specific language aptitude tests – the case of Cantonese. A Journal of English Language, Literatures and Cultural Studies, 60(1), 45-73. doi: 10.5007/2175-8026.2011n60p045
  16. Cheung, H. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 867-873.
  17. De Bot, K. (2008). Second language development as a dynamic process. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 166-178.
  18. De Bot, K. (2015). A bias in citation patterns in applied linguistics: The case of the bilingual advantage. In J. Navracsics & Sz. Bátyi (Eds.), First and second language: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 22-32). Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.
  19. De Bruin, A., Treccani, B., & Della Sala, S. (2015). Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: An example of publication bias? Psychological Science, 26(1), 99-107.
  20. Dehn, M. J. (2008). Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
  21. Dehn, M. J., Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2015). Essentials of working memory assessment and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
  22. DeKeyser, R. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62(Suppl. 2), 189-200.
  23. Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247-267) London: Continuum.
  24. Doughty, C. J., Campbell, S. G., Mislevy, M. A., Bunting, M. F., Bowles, A. R., & Koeth, J. T. (2010). Predicting near-native ability: The factor structure and reliability of Hi-LAB. In M. T. Prior et al. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 10-31). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  25. Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 91-126.
  26. Ellis, N. C. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17-44. doi:10.1017/S0267190512000025
  27. Ellis, N. C. (2013). Second language acquisition. In G. Trousdale & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 365-378). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. Ellis, N. C., & Sinclair, S. G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(1), 234-250.
  29. Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. London: Routledge.
  30. Engel de Abreu, P. M. J. (2011). Working memory in multilingual children: Is there a bilingual effect? Memory, 19(5), 529-537.
  31. Eysenck, M. (2012). Fundamentals of cognition. Hove: Psychology.
  32. Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Research pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 75-93). Harlow: Longman.
  33. Foster, P., Bolibaugh, C., & Kotula, A. (2014). Knowledge of nativelike selections in an L2: The influence of exposure, memory, age of onset and motivation in foreign language and immersion settings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 101-132.
  34. French, L. M. (2006). Phonological working memory and second language acquisition: A developmental study of francophone children learning English in Quebec. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
  35. French, L. M., & O’Brien, I. (2008). Phonological memory and children's second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(3), 463-487.
  36. Gass, S., & Lee, J. (2011). Working memory capacity, Stroop interference, and proficiency in a second language. In M. Schmid & W. Lowie (Eds.), From structure to chaos: Twenty years of modeling bilingualism (pp. 59-84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  37. Gathercole, S. E., & Alloway, T. P. (2008). Working memory and classroom learning. In K. Thurman & K. Fiorello (Eds.), Cognitive development in K-3 classroom learning: Research applications (pp. 15-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  38. Granena G., & Long M. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311-343.
  39. Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive attitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate attainment (pp. 3-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  40. Grigorenko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. E. (2000). A theory based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The CANAL-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal, 84, 390-405.
  41. Grotek, M. (2002). Foreign language learning in late adulthood: Memory strategy training (Unpublished MA dissertation). Sosnowiec, University of Silesia.
  42. Holmes, J., Gathercole, S. E., & Dunning, D. L. (2009). Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Developmental Science, 12(4), F9-F15.
  43. Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  44. Jessner, U. (2014). Multilingual awareness or why the multilingual learner is a specific language learner. In M. Pawlak & L. Aronin (Eds.), Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism (pp. 175-184). Heidelberg: Springer.
  45. Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 317-324.
  46. Kormos, J. (2013). New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate attainment (pp. 131-152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  47. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language research. London: Longman.
  48. Lognostics. (2016). Free software from _lognostics. The LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests. Retrieved from
  49. MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109(1), 35-54. Retrieved from
  50. Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological STM and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 379-413.
  51. Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Swansea: Lognostics.
  52. Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270-291.
  53. Misyak, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2010). On-line individual differences in statistical learning predict language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(31). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00031
  54. Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
  55. Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  56. Morales, J., Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(2), 187-202.
  57. Muñoz, C. (2014). The association between aptitude components and language skills in young learners. In M. Pawlak & L. Aronin (Eds.), Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism (pp. 51-68). Heidelberg: Springer.
  58. Neufeld, G. G. (1978). A theoretical perspective on the nature of language aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 16-26.
  59. O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(3), 377-402.
  60. O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2007). Phonological memory predicts L2 oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(4), 557-582.
  61. Parry, T., & Stansfield, C. W. (Eds.). (1990). Language aptitude reconsidered. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  62. Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  63. Robinson P. (Ed.). (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  64. Rosenthal, J. (1996). Teaching science to language minority students: Theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  65. Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, K. N. Chin, S. Bhattm, & I. Walker (Eds.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education (pp. 27-50). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
  66. Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory and foreign-language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A45(1), 21-50.
  67. Singleton, D. (2014). Apt to change: The problematic of language awareness and language aptitude in age-related research. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 557-571.
  68. Skehan, P. (1986). Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language learning (pp. 81-94). Oxford: Pergamon.
  69. Skehan, P. (2001). Individual differences in second and foreign language learning. Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies Guide to Good Practice. Retrieved from
  70. Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69-95). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  71. Skehan, P. (2012). Language aptitude. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 381-395). London: Routledge.
  72. Skrzypek, A. & Singleton, D. (2013). Phonological short-term memory and knowledge of L2 collocations: The direction of causality. In E. Mańczak-Wohlfeld & M. Jodłowiec (Eds.), Exploring the microcosm and macrocosm of language teaching and learning. A festschrift on the occasion of the 70th birthday of Professor Anna Niżegorodcew (pp. 115-132). Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press.
  73. Skrzypek, A. (2009). Phonological short-term memory and L2 collocational development in adult learners. EUROSLA Yearbook, 9, 160-184.
  74. Sparks, R. (2012). Individual differences in L2 learning and long-term L1-L2 relationships. Language Learning, 62(Supplement 2), 5-27.
  75. Stansfield, C. W. (1989). Language aptitude reconsidered. Retrieved from ERIC Digest. (ED318226)
  76. Tsai, N., Au, J., & Jaeggi S. M. (2016). Malleability of working memory and implications for second language acquisition. In G. Granena, D.O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in L2 processing and acquisition (pp. 69-88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  77. Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.
  78. Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2016). How do verbal short-term memory and working memory relate to the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar? A comparison between first and second language learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141(1), 65-82.
  79. Vinkhuysen, A. A. E., van der Sluis, S., Posthum, D., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). The heritability of aptitude and exceptional talent across different domains in adolescents and young adults. Behavior Genetics, 39(4), 380-392.
  80. Wen, Z. (2012). Foreign language aptitude. ELT Journal, 66(2), 233-235.
  81. Wen, Z. (2016). Working memory and second language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  82. Wen, Z., & Skehan, P. (2011). A new perspective on foreign language aptitude: Building and supporting a case for “working memory as language aptitude.” Ilha Do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures and Cultural Studies, 60, 15-44.
  83. Wen, Z., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. State-of-the-art article. Language Teaching, 50(1), 1-31.
  84. Williams, J. N. (2012). Working memory and SLA. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 427-441). Oxford: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
  85. Williams, J. N., & Lovatt, P. (2003). Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning, 53(1), 67-121.
  86. Williams, J. N. (2015). Working memory in SLA research: Challenges and prospects. In Z. Wen, M. Mota, & A. McNeill E. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 301-307). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.