Keywords
language testing
learners’ voice
study abroad
formal language education
How to Cite
Number of views: 632
Number of downloads: 529
Abstract
Language educators in many parts of the world are torn between preparing language learners to pass language proficiency tests and trying to let their classrooms reflect the messiness of out-of-class communication. Because testing is “an activity which perhaps more than any other dictates what is taught” (Hall, 2014, p. 379), helping students to pass language proficiency tests seems to be a current top priority. Since globalisation “has destabilised the codes, norms, and conventions that FL [foreign language] educators relied upon to help learners be successful users of the language once they had left their classrooms” (Kramsch, 2014, p.296), the gap between what is taught in classrooms or measured in examination halls and what is used in real life situations has become much bigger. Testimonies from Study abroad students feed into this discussion. This article addresses the gap between being a language learner and a language user and the implications of this on learners’ perceptions of their language abilities, as illustrated by the story of Mahmoud, a study abroad student in the UK. It also features learner’s voice, exploring Mahmoud’s views of his previous formal language education and concludes with pedagogical implications for language educators.Funding
Thanks are due to Mahmoud
Dr James Simpson and Prof Mike Baynham for their contributions to the research here reported. This work was supported by a scholarship from the School of Education at University of Leeds.
References
Bachman, L., & Purpura, J. (2008). Language assessments: Gate-keepers or door-openers? In B. Spolsky & E. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (pp. 456-468).
Badwan, K. (2015). Arab academic sojourners’ sociolinguistic trajectories in the UK (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). University of Leeds.
Benson, P., Barkhuizen, G., Bodycott, P., & Brown, J. (2013). Second language identity in narratives of study abroad. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Byram, M. (2008). From intercultural education to education for intercultural citizenship. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Canagarajah, S. (2014). In search of a new paradigm for teaching english as an international language. TESOL Journal, 5(4), 767-785. doi: 10.1002/tesj.166
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2011). Towards a multilingual approach in the study of multilingualism in school contexts. Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 339-343. Retreived from http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.wam.leeds.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-4781
Cook, V. (2009). Language user groups and language teaching. In V. Cook & Li Wei (Eds.), Contemporary applied linguistics Volume 1: Language teaching and learning. London and New York: Continuum( pp. 54-74).
Ellis, N. (2011). The emergence of language as a complex adaptive system. In J. Simpson(Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of applied linguistics. Routledge: London (pp. 666-79).
Gray, J. (2002). The global coursebook in English language teaching., In D. Block, & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 151-67). London: Routledge.
Gray, J. (2012). English the industry. In A. Hewings & C. Tagg (Eds), The politics of English (pp. 137-163). New York: Routledge.
Hall, C. (2012). Cognitive contributions to plurilithic views of english and other languages. Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 211-231. doi: 10.1093/applin/ams042
Hall, C. (2014). Moving beyond accuracy: From tests of English to tests of ‘Englishing’. ELT Journal, 68(4), 376-385. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccu016
Harvey, L. (2014). Language learning motivation as ideological becoming: Dialogues with six English-language learners (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). University of Manchester.
Heller, M., & Duchêne, A. (2012). Pride and profit: Changing discourses of language, capital and nation-state. In M. Heller & A. Duchêne (Eds.), Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit (pp. 1-21). New York: Routledge.
Holborow, M. (2015). Language and neoliberalism. London: Routledge.
Holmes, J., & N. Riddiford. (2011). From classroom to workplace: Tracking socio-pragmatic development. ELT Journal, 65(4), 376-386. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccq071
Jenkins, J. (2006). The spread of EIL: A testing time for testers. ELT Journal, 60(1), 42-50. doi: 10.1093/elt/cci080
Kanno, Y., & B. Norton. (2003). Imagined communities and educational possibilities. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2(4), 241–249. doi: 10.1207/ S15327701JLIE0204_1
Kramsch, C. (2011). Why is everyone so excited about complexity theory in applied linguistics. Mélanges Crapel n° 33, 9-24. Retreived from http://194.214.124.224/IMG/pdf/02.pdf
Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 296-311. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12057.x
Kramsch, C. (2015). Language and culture in second language learning. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 403-416). London: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-165. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.2.141
Larsen-Freeman, D., & L. Cameron. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). The emancipation of the language learner. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 297-309. Retreived from https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/handle/10593/5737
MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Profession 2007, 234-45. Retreived from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25595871?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9-31. doi: 10.2307/3587803
Osberg, D. (2008). The logic of emergence: An alternative conceptual space for theorizing critical education. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 6(1), 133-161.
Pellegrino Aveni, V. (2007). Speak for yourself: Second language use and self-construction during study abroad. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Insights from study abroad for language programmes (pp. 99-115). Sydney: Thomson Heinle.
Pennycook, A. (2000). The social politics and the cultural politics of the language classromms. In J. K. Hall & W. G. Eggington (Eds.), The sociopolitics of English language teaching. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Pennycook, A. (2007). The myth of English as an International language. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 90-115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Roberts, C., Baynham, M., Cooke, M., & Simpson, J. (2007). Adult ESOL in the UK: Policy and research. Prospect, 22(3), 18-31. Retreived from http://www.ameprc.mq.edu.au/docs/prospect_journal/volume_22_no_3/Adult_ESOL_in_the_United_Kingdom.pdf
Santipolo, M. (2015). Bespoke Language Teaching (BLT): A proposal for a theoretical framework: The case of EFL/ELF to Italians. A paper presented at 2nd Languages in the Globalised World Conference. 27-28 May 2015, Leeds Beckett University.
Simpson, J. (2015). English language learning for adult migrants in superdiverse Britain. In J. Simpson & A. Whiteside (Eds.), Language learning and migration: Challenging agendas in policy and practice (pp. 200-213). London: Routledge.
Ushioda, E. (2011). Motivating learners to speak as themselves. In G. Murray, G., X. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 11-24). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Vertovec, S. (2006). The emergence of super-diversity in Britain. Working paper no. 25. Oxford: Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/media/WP-2006-025-Vertovec_Super-Diversity_Britain.pdf
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.