Kortikale und subkortikale Sprachareale im Lichte der neurokognitiven Sprachverarbeitungsmodelle

Article Sidebar

PDF (Deutsch)
Opublikowane: sty 1, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2013.40.2.2

Main Article Content

Iwona Legutko-Marszałek

Abstrakt

In this article it has been pointed out that these are not only cortical but also subcortical parts of brain which participate in language processing. Apart from that, typical languageareas take part in different non-language cognitive processes. Hence the linguistic ability should not be understood as a single and separate cognitive skill which can be attributed to some particular language organ, whose function consists only in producing and analyzing linguistic signals.Language should rather be perceived as a complex phenomenon and language processing as the one consisting of many subprocesses which is indicated by neuro-cognitive models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Legutko-Marszałek, I. (2013). Kortikale und subkortikale Sprachareale im Lichte der neurokognitiven Sprachverarbeitungsmodelle. Glottodidactica. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(2), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2013.40.2.2
Numer
Tom 40 Nr 2 (2013)
Dział
Artykuły

Autorzy

Autorzy tekstów przyjętych do publikacji w czasopiśmie Glottodidactica są zobowiązani do wypełnienia, podpisania i odesłania na adres redakcji umowy o udzielenie nieodpłatnej licencji do utworów, z zobowiązaniem do udzielania sublicencji CC.

Zgodnie z umową, autorzy tekstów opublikowanych w czasopiśmie Glottodidactica udzielają Uniwersytetowi im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu niewyłącznej i nieodpłatnej licencji oraz zezwalą na użycie sublicencji Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Autorzy zachowują prawa do dalszego, swobodnego rozporządzania utworem.

Użytkownicy

Zainteresowani użytkownicy internetu uprawnieni są do korzystania z utworów opublikowanych od 2015 roku w Glottodidactica pod następującymi warunkami:

  • uznanie autorstwa - obowiązek podania wraz z rozpowszechnionym utworem, informacji, o autorstwie, tytule, źródle (odnośniki do oryginalnego utworu, DOI) oraz samej licencji;
  • bez tworzenia utworów zależnych - utwór musi być zachowany w  oryginalnej postaci, nie można bez zgody twórcy rozpowszechniać np. tłumaczeń, opracowań.

Do wszystkich tekstów opublikowanych przed 2015 r. prawa autorskie są zastrzeżone.

Inne

Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu zachowuje prawo do czasopisma jako całości (układ, forma graficzna, tytuł, projekt okładki, logo itp.).

Referencje

  1. Ackermann, H., 2008. Cerebral contributions to speech production and speech perception: psycholinguistic and neurobiological perspectives. In: Trends in Neurosciences 31, 265-272.
  2. Binder, J.R., Frost, J.A., Hammeke, T.A., Cox, R.W., Rao, S.M., Prieto, T., 1997. Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience 17, 353-362.
  3. Booth, J.R., Wood, L., Lu, D., Houk, J.C., Bitan, T., 2007. The role of the basal ganglia and cerebellum in language processing. In: Brain Research 1133, 136-144.
  4. Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E., Schenone, P., Scarpa, P., Frackowiak, R.S., Frith, C.D., 1994. The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A PET-activation study. Brain 117, 1241-1253.
  5. Carter, R. ,2010. Das Gehirn. München: Dorling Kindersley Verlag.
  6. Cieślicka, A.B., Heredia, R.R., 2011. Hemispheric asymmetries in processing L1 and L2 idioms: Effects of salience and context. In: Brain and Language 116, 136-150.
  7. Code, C., 1997. Can the right hemisphere speak? In: Brain and Language 57, 38-59.
  8. Coulson, S., van Petten, C., 2002. Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related potential study. In: Memory and Cognition 30, 958-968.
  9. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T.J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R.D., Damasio, A.R. 1996. A neural basis for lexical retrieval. In: Nature 380, 499-505.
  10. Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Grabowski, T., Adolphs, R., Damasio, A.R., 2004. Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. In: Cognition 92, 179-229.
  11. Desmond, J.E., Gabrieli, J.D., Glover, G.H., 1998. Dissociation of frontal and cerebeller activity in a cognitive task: evidence for distinction between selection and search. In:Neuroimage 7, 368-376.
  12. Friederici, A.D., 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6, 78-84.
  13. Friederici, A.D., Alter, K., 2004. Lateralization of auditory language functions: a dinamic dual pathway model. In: Brain and Language 89, 267-276.
  14. Friederici, A.D., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schubotz, R.I., Anwander, A., 2006. The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: functional localization and structural connectivity. In: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 2458-2463.
  15. Geschwind, N., 1965. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. In: Brain 88, 113-120.
  16. Hellige, J.B., 2001. Hemispheric asymmetry; What’s right and what’s left. Harvard: University Press.
  17. Herrmann, Ch., Fiebach, Ch., 2007. Gehirn und Sprache. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
  18. Hickok, G., Poeppel, D., 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8, 393-402.
  19. Johnson, M.D., Ojemann, G.A., 2000. The role of the human thalamus in language and memory: evidence from electrophysiological studies. In: Brain and Cognition 42, 218-230.
  20. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A., Keller, T.A., Eddy, W.F., 1996. Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. In: Science 274, 114-116.
  21. Kotz, S.A., 2009. A critical review of ERP and fMRI evidence on L2 syntactic processing. In: Brain and Language 109, 68-74.
  22. Maess, B., Koelsch, S., Gunter, T.C., Friederici, A.D., 2001. Musical syntax is processed in Broca’s area: an MEG study. In: Nature Neuroscience 4, 540-545.
  23. Moro, A., Tettamanti, M., Perani, D., Donati, C., Cappa, S.F., Fazio, F., 2001. Syntax and the brain: disentangling gram mar by selective anomalies. In: Neuroimage 13, 110-118.
  24. Müller, H.M., 2003. Neurobiologische Grundlagen der Sprache. In: Rickheit, G., Herrmann,T., Deutsch W. (Hrsg.) Psycholinguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch. Berlin:Mounton de Gruyter.
  25. Müller, H.M., Kutas, M., 1996. What’s in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names, and one’s own name. In: NeuroReport 8, 221-225.
  26. Ojemann, G.A., 1994. Cortical simulation and recording in language. In: Kertesz, A. (Ed.) Localization and neuroimaging in neuropsychology. San Diego: Academic Press, 35-55.
  27. Petersen, S.P., Fox, P.T., Posner, M.I., Mintun, M., Raichle, M.E., 1988. Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. In: Nature 331, 585-589.
  28. Price, C.J., 2000. The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging.In: Journal of Anatomy 197, 335-359.
  29. Pulvermüller, F., 1999. Words in the brain’s language. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 253.
  30. Pulvermüller, F., 2005. Brain mechanism linking language and action. In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 576-582.
  31. Pulvermüller, F., Fadiga, L. 2010. Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11, 351-360.
  32. Rickheit, G., Weiss, S., Eikmeyer, H.J. 2010. Kognitive Linguistik. Theorien, Modelle, Methoden. Tübingen: Narr Francke.
  33. Sammler, D., Koelsch, S., Ball, T., Brandt, A., Elger, C.E., Friederici, A.D., 2009. Overlap of musical and linguistic syntax processing: intracranial ERP evidence. In: Ann N Y Acad Sci 1169, 494-498.
  34. Saur, D., Kreher, BW., Schnell, S., Kümmerer, D., Kellmeyer, P., Vry, M.S., Umarova, R., Musso, M., Glauche, V., Abel, S., Huber, W., Rijntjes, M., Hennig, J., Weiler, C., 2008. Ventral und dorsal pathways for language. In: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 18035-18040.
  35. Schmidt, G.L., Seger, C.A., 2009. Neural correlates of metaphor processing: the roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty. In: Brain and Cognition 71, 375-386.
  36. Singer, W., 1994. Ceherence as a organizing principle of cortical functions. In: International Review of Neurobiology 37, 153-183.
  37. Skrandies, W., 2004. Die Bedeutung von Wörtern und elektrische Hirnaktivität des Menschen.
  38. In: Müller H.M., Rickheit G. (Hrsg.) Neurokognition der Sprache. Tübingen: Staufenburg, 91-106.
  39. Springer, S.P., Deutsch, G., 1998. Linkes – rechtes Gehirn. Heidelberg: Spektrum.
  40. St. George, M., Kutas, M., Martines, A., Sereno, M.I., 1999. Semantic integration in reading: Engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. In: Brain 122, 1317-1325.
  41. Stowe, L.A., Haverkort, M., Zwarts, F., 2005. Rethinking the neurobiological basis of language. Lingua 115, 997-1042.
  42. Tettamanti, M., Moro, A., Messa, C., Moresco, R.M., Rizzo, G., Carpinelli, A., Matarrese, M., Fazio, F., Perani, D., 2005. Basal ganglia and language: phonology modulates dopaminergic release. In: NeuroReport 16, 397-401.
  43. Ullman, M.T., 2006. Is Broca’s area part of basal ganglia thalamocortical circuit? In: Cortex 42, 480-485.
  44. Wahl, M., Marzinzik, F., Fiederici, A.D., Hahne, A., Kupsch, A., Schneider, G.H., Saddy, D., Curio, G., Klostermann, F., 2008. The human thalamus processes syntactic and semantic language violations. In: Neuron 59, 695-707.
  45. Wallesch, C.W., 2006. Sprache. In: Karnath, H.-O., Trier, P. (Hrsg.) Neuropsychologie.Berlin: Springer.
  46. Weiss, S., 2009. Gehirnoszillationen und neuronale Kommunikation während der Verarbeitung von Sprache. Kum. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Bielefeld.
  47. Weiss, S., Müller, H.M., 2003. The contribution of EEG coherence to the investigation of language. Brain and Language 85, 325-343.