Colonialism in another Way. On the Applicability of Postcolonial Methodology for the Study of Postcommunist Europe

Main Article Content

Mykoła Riabczuk

Abstract

The paper defends the usefulness of the postcolonial approach to the study of various processes in the postcommunist countries that belonged, for decades, to the inner and outer parts of the Soviet empire. The paper shows, in particular, how some developments in post-Soviet Ukraine can be better understood in the context of Russo-Soviet internal colonialism, and how Ukraine’s thoroughgoing ambivalence and conspicuous regionalism result historically from different types of colonization of different regions. The paper insists, nonetheless, on a clear recognition of intrinsic limitations of the postcolonial approach, determined primarily by the absence of the racist component in Soviet imperialism – the component that is crucial for the classical (post)colonial situation and that makes it profoundly different from the Soviet one in terms of the complete exclusion / potential inclusion of subjugated peoples. In sum, all the usefulness of postcolonial theorizing for the analysis of the postcommunist world should not inhibit researchers from the recognition of its only partial and very conditional applicability, and of the need for due reservations, selfreflection and self-restrain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Riabczuk, M. (2013). Colonialism in another Way. On the Applicability of Postcolonial Methodology for the Study of Postcommunist Europe. Porównania, 13, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.14746/p.2013.13.10972
Section
Articles

References

  1. Grabowicz Oxana, The Legacy of Colonialism and Communism in Ukraine: Some Key Issues. “Perspectives on Contemporary Ukraine” 1995, nr 2.
  2. Grabowicz Oxana, The Legacy of Colonialism and Communism in Ukraine: Some Key Issues. “Arka” 1994, nr 2.
  3. Hechter Michael, Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development, 1536–1966. London 1975, p. XVI–XVII.
  4. Motyl Alexander, Soviet-Style Imperialism & the Ukrainian Language. “World Affairs Journal” 11.02.2013; http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/alexander-j-motyl/soviet-style-imperialism-ukrainian-lan guage.
  5. Carey Henry F., Raciborski Rafał, Postcolonialism: A Valid Paradigm for the Former Sovietized States and Yugoslavia? “East European Politics & Societies” 2004, nr 2.
  6. Korek Janusz, Central and Eastern Europe from a Postcolonial Perspective. In: From Sovietology to Postcoloniality. Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective. Ed. J. Korek. Huddinge 2007.
  7. Fiut Aleksander, In the Shadows of Empires. Postcolonialism in Central and Eastern Europe – Why Not? Ibidem.; Postcolonialism/Postcommunism: Intersections and Overlaps. Ed. M. Bottez et al. Bucharest 2011.
  8. Tlostanova Madina, Postsocialist ≠ Postcolonial? On Post-Soviet Imaginary and Global Coloniality. “Journal of Postcolonial Writing” 2012, nr 2.
  9. Scheibner Tamás, Okres postkolonialny czy postkolonialna Europa Wschodnia i Środkowa? “Porównania” 2009, nr 6.
  10. Moore David Chioni, Is the Post- in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet? Toward a Global Postcolonial Critique. “PMLA” 2001, nr 1, p. 117.
  11. Snyder Timothy, Bloodlands. New York 2010.
  12. Carothers Thmoas, The End of the Transition Paradigm. “Journal of Democracy” 2002, nr 2.
  13. Putnam Robert D., Making Democracy Work. Princeton 1993.
  14. Kołodziejczyk Dorota, Sandru Cristina, Introduction: On colonialism, communism and East-central Europe – some reflections. “Journal of Postcolonial Writing” 2012, nr 2, p. 113.
  15. Martin Terry, An Affirmative Action Empire: The Soviet Union as the Highest Form of Imperialism. In: Suny R. G., Martin T. (eds.), A State of Nations: Empire and Nation-Making in the Age of Lenin and Stalin. Oxford 2001.
  16. Hirsch Francine, Empire of nations: ethnographic knowledge & the making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca 2005.
  17. Величенко C., Чи була Україна російською колонією? Деякі зауваження щодо поняття колоніялізм. “Україна модерна” 2009, nr 3.
  18. Slezkine Yuri, Arctic Mirrors: Russia and the Small Peoples of the North. Ithaca 1994.
  19. Layton Susan, Russian Literature and Empire: Conquest of the Caucasus from Pushkin to Tolstoy. Cambridge 1994.
  20. Sandru Cristina, Worlds Apart? A Postcolonial Reading of Post-1945 East-Central European Culture. Cambridge 2012.
  21. Kappeler Andreas, Mazepintsy, Malorossy, Khokhly: Ukrainians in the Ethnic Hierarchy of the Russian Empire. In: Culture, Nation, and Identity. Ed. A. Kappeler et al. Edmonton 2003.
  22. Motyl Alexander, Will the NonRussians Rebel? Ithaca 1987.
  23. Weber Eugen, Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernizarion of Rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford 1974.
  24. Миллер A., “Украинский вопрос” в политике властей и русском общественном мнении (вторая половина XIХ века).С.-Петербург 2000.
  25. Riabchuk Mykoła, The Ukrainian ‘Friday’ and the Russian ‘Robinson’: The Uneasy Advent of Postcoloniality. “Canadian American Slavic Studies” 2010, nr 1–2.
  26. Etkind Alexander, Internal Colonialism. Cambridge 2011.
  27. Эткинд А., et al. (ред.), Там, внутри. Практики внутренней колонизации в культурной истории Росссии. Москва 2012.