Abstrakt
Brexit, as seen from the present perspective, is seemingly a success story. Taking into account a myriad of voices expressed in the public domain over the past few years, it is legitimate to make a cautious claim that some of the expectations people shared before/during the referendum have been inflated and deflated in the post-plebiscite reality. In 2016, across the majority that voted for the divorce, a growing consensus on the soundness and solidity of pro-Leave arguments about Britain being in crisis was seen. The proponents of change had endorsed the policy of restoring a sense of national dignity. That mode of reasoning, though still present within current “British” mindsets, has been confronted with the “unplanned” turbulence of national (re) adjustment. The whole process of bidding farewell to the European Union has led to sentiments of uncertainty/anxiety/regret, rather than to the anticipated sense of satisfaction/relief. Therefore, it seems both vital and interesting to juxtapose the passion about restoring people’s trust in Britishness/Englishness, and its “exceptionality” with more sobering projections of a new post-Brexit world. In order to discuss the consequences of this self-inflicted condition, I will here elaborate on selected English literary texts. They feature authors who draw conclusions running parallel to Anderson’s assumptions that in times of crisis a general predilection for self-deluding (re)constructions of collective identity can be observed, which are variously expressed in a merely referential, subversive or satirical manner.
Reference
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso, 2006.
Aughey, Arthur. “Anxiety and Injustice: The Anatomy of Contemporary English Nationalism.” Nations and Nationalism 16. 3 (2010): 506–524.
Barnes, Julian. England, England. London: Vintage, 2012.
Bauman, Zygmunt. In Search of Politics. Stanford: University Press, 1999.
Berger, Stefan. “A Return to the National Paradigm? National History Writing in Germany, Italy, France, and Britain from 1945 to the Present.” The Journal of Modern History 77 (2005): 629–678.
Bilenkyi, Serhii. Romantic Nationalism in Eastern Europe: Russian, Polish, and Ukrainian Political Imaginations. Stanford: University Press, 2012.
Black, Jack. “From Mood to Movement: English Nationalism, the European Union and Taking Back Control.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32. 2 (2019): 191–210.
Boyle, Frankie. The Future of British Politics. London: Unbound, 2020.
Bradford, Richard. “Julian Barnes’s England, England and Englishness.” Julian Barnes: Contemporary Critical Perspectives. Eds. Sebastian Groes and Peter Childs. London: Continuum, 2011: 92–102.
Browning, Christopher. “Brexit Populism and Fantasies of Fulfilment.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32. 3 (2019): 222–244.
Chetty, Darren. “‘You Can’t Say That! Stories Have to Be About White People’.” Good Immigrant. Ed. Nikesh Shukla. London: Unbound, 2017. 96–107.
Cheyette, Bryan. “English Literature Saved My Life.” Brexit and Literature. Ed. Robert Eaglestone. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019. 66–72.
Condor, Susan and Steve Fenton. “Thinking across Domains: Class, Nation and Racism in England and Britain.” Ethnicities 12. 4 (2012): 385–393.
Craig, Amanda. The Lie of the Land. London: Abacus, 2017.
Cuddon, John Anthony. Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms. London: Penguin Books, 1992.
de Bourbon-Parme, Tristan. “A Rational Vote Against a Rational Argument? (Or What Was It Really About?)” Do They Means Us? The Foreign Correspondents’ View of Brexit. Eds. John Mair and Neil Fowler. Birmingham: University Press, 2019. 30–34.
Docherty, Thomas. “Brexit: Thinking and Resistance.” Brexit and Literature. Ed. Robert Eaglestone. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019: 181–195.
Einhaus, Ann-Marie. “Researching Britain and Europe, Then and Now.” Brexit and Literature. Ed. Robert Eaglestone. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019: 160–166.
Fukuyama, Francis. Identity. Contemporary Identity Politics and the Struggle for Recognition. London: Profile Books, 2019.
Galton, Bridget. “Amanda Craig: ‘Brexit Is a Lightning Rod for Rural People’.” 3 July 2017, https://tinyurl.com/49kkvw5b. Accessed 29 April 2021.
Hall, Stuart. “Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms.” Contemporary Literary Criticism. Literary and Cultural Studies. Eds. Robert Con Davis and Ronald Schleifer, 1998: 663–678.
Heidemann, Birte. “The Brexit Within: Mapping the Rural and the Urban in Contemporary British Fiction.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 2020: 1–14.
Hirsch, Afua. Brit(ish). On Race, Identity and Belonging. London: Vintage, 2018.
Hollinghurst, Alan. “A Larger Life.” A Love Letter to Europe. An Outpouring of Sadness and Hope from Writers, Thinkers and Artists. Hodder & Stoughton. Kindle Edition, 2019: Loc. 300–306.
Kapsali, Daphne. Divided Kingdom. How Brexit Made Me an Immigrant. Poland: Amazon Fulfillment, 2016.
McEwan, Ian. The Cockroach. London: Jonathan Cape, 2019.
Mishra, Pankaj. Age of Anger. A History of the Present. London: Penguin Books, 2018.
Nedergaard, Peter and Maja Friis Henriksen. “Brexit and British Exceptionalism.” Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit. Eds. Patric Diamond and Peter Nedergaard. London: Routledge, 2018. 134–146.
Said, Edward. “Invention, Memory and Place.” Critical Inquiry 26: 2 (2000): 175–192.
Schultz, Bettina. “Did the British Ever Understood Europe? (Or Was It Always Outside Their Immagination?)” Do They Means Us? The Foreign Correspondents’ View of Brexit. Eds. John Mair and Neil Fowler. Birmingham: University Press, 2019. 25–29.
Shaw, Kristian. “BrexLit.” Brexit and Literature. Ed. Robert Eaglestone. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019. 15–30.
Smith, Ali. Autumn. London: Penguin Books, 2017.
Sobolewska, Maria and Robert Ford. BrexitLand. Cambridge: University Press, 2020.
Stratton, Jon. “The Language of Leaving: Brexit, the Second World War and Cultural Trauma.” Journal for Cultural Research 23. 3 (2019): 225–251.
Stonebridge, Lyndsay. “The Banality of Brexit.” Brexit and Literature. Ed. Robert Eaglestone. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019. 7–15.
Upstone, Sara. “Do Novels Tell Us How to Vote.” Brexit and Literature. Ed. Robert Eaglestone. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019. 44–58.
Wigura, Katarzyna. “Psoty z żukiem.” 16 March 2010, https://tinyurl.com/jbpuf387. Accessed 28 April 2021.
Wincott, Daniel. “Brexit and the State of the United Kingdom.” Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit. Eds. Patric Diamond and Peter Nedergaard. London: Routledge, 2018. 15–26.
Young, Lucien. Alice in Brexitland. London: Ebury Press, 2017.
Licence
Utwory opublikowane w czasopiśmie „Porównania”, na platformie Pressto należącej do Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu są udostępniane na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-ND 4.0)
Tym samym wszyscy zainteresowani są uprawnieni do korzystania z utworów opublikowanych pod następującymi warunkami:
-
uznania autorstwa — czyli obowiązek podania wraz z rozpowszechnianym utworem informacji o autorstwie, tytule, źródle (odnośniki do oryginalnego utworu, doi) oraz samej licencji
-
bez utworów zależnych — remiksując, przetwarzając lub tworząc na podstawie utworu, nie wolno rozpowszechniać zmodyfikowanych treści.
-
brak dodatkowych ograniczeń — nie można korzystać ze środków prawnych lub technologicznych, które ograniczają innych w korzystaniu z utworu na warunkach określonych w licencji.
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu zachowuje prawo do czasopisma jako całości (układ, forma graficzna, tytuł, projekt okładki, logo itp.).
Autor zachowuje prawa majątkowe, ale udziela zgody Uniwersytetowi im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu na wykorzystanie dzieła. Autorzy tekstów zakwalifikowanych do publikacji proszeni są o wypełnienie podpisanie i przesłanie umowa (PL) agreement (EN)
Agreement for granting a royalty-free license to works with a commitment to grant a CC sub-license