Mirror clauses and mirror measures as instruments for protecting the European model of agriculture
Journal cover Przegląd Prawa Rolnego, no. 1(38), year 2026
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

mirror clauses
mirror measures
WTO law
European Green Deal
European model of agriculture

How to Cite

Pastuszko, R. (2026). Mirror clauses and mirror measures as instruments for protecting the European model of agriculture. Przegląd Prawa Rolnego, (1(38), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.14746/ppr.2026.38.1.7

Abstract

This study aims to characterise mirror clauses and mirror measures as instruments for protecting the European model of agriculture. The liberalisation of agri-food trade has coincided with the tightening of environmental, sanitary, and animal welfare standards within the EU. At the same time, however, it has revealed the problem of double standards and regulatory asymmetry. The article advances the thesis that mirror instruments constitute a necessary, but not sufficient, means of safeguarding the competitiveness of European agriculture. Two main categories of mirror instruments are identified: treaty obligations and unilateral EU acts with extraterritorial effect. Tariff conditionality mechanisms may perform a similar function. The analysis encompasses the legal foundations of World Trade Organization (WTO) law as well as European Union law and selected sectoral regulations.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ppr.2026.38.1.7
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Alvares-Garcia A. Jr. (2024), Cláusulas espejo en el Comercio Internacional: Desafíos y Perspectivas para la Agricultura Europea, „Millennium DIPr.” nr 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36151/MDIPR.2024.004

Beckman J., Ivanic M., Jelliffe J.L., Baquedano F.G., Scott S.G. (2020), Economic and Food Security Impacts of Agricultural Input Reduction under the European Union Green Deal’s Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies, USDA Economic Research Service, Economic Brief No. 30, Washington.

Choi W.M. (2003), „Like products” in international trade law: towards a consistent GATT/WTO jurisprudence, New York.

Du M. (2015), What is a “Technical Regulation” in the TBT Agreement?, „European Journal of Risk Regulation” t. 6, nr 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00004840

Gohin A., Matthews A. (2024), Adding mirror clauses within the European Green Deal: Hype or hope?, „Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy” t. 46, nr 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13434

Henning C., Witzke P., Panknin L., Grunenberg M. (2021), Ökonomische und Ökologische Auswirkungen des Green Deals in der Agrarwirtschaft, Kiel.

Hestermeyer H.P. (2011), Article III GATT, w: R. Wolfrum, P.-T. Stoll, H.P. Hestermeyer (red.), WTO – Trade in Goods, Leiden – Boston.

Leśkiewicz K. (2025), Safety of animal food imported into the European Union in light of the European Union-Mercosur Partnership Agreement, „Przegląd Prawa Rolnego” nr 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ppr.2025.36.1.9

Noordwijk van M., Leimona B., Minang, P. A. (2025), The European deforestation-free trade regulation: collateral damage to agroforesters?, „Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability” 72: 101505.

Rudloff B. (2025), Die EU zwischen unilateralen Nachhaltigkeitsansätzen und Handelsabkommen: Wege zu besseren Partnerschaften, „SWP-Studie” nr 2.