Keywords
Plato
Krleža
dialogue
knowledge
How to Cite
Abstract
Questioning the commonly held assumption in critical reception that Ibsenʼs symbol of the wild duck was influenced by Darwinʼs theory, I want to argue that the wild duck flew into Ibsenʼs play all the way from Platoʼs aporetic dialogue The Theaetetus. Following Lacanʼs reading of Plato, I want to examine the connection between the Socratic position towards knowledge – especially the rupture between knowledge and truth – and the treatment of dramatic dialogue in Ibsenʼs The Wild Duck and Krležaʼs The Glembays.
References
Aarseth, A. (2005). Ibsen and Darwin: A Reading of The Wild Duck. „Modern Drama” no. 48 (1), str. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3138/md.48.1.1.
Arbanas, G., Kreho, D. (2019). Leone Glembay – psihijatrijska i forenzička razmatranja književnog lika. „Liječnički vjesnik” vol. 141, br. 1–2, str. 40–44. https://doi. org/10.26800/LV-141-1-2-7.
Auerbach, E. (2004). Mimeza. Prikaz zbilje u zapadnoeuropskoj književnosti. Zagreb: Hena com.
Durbach, E. (2009). Ibsen’s Evangelical Detective: Evidence and Proof in The Wild Duck. „Scandinavian-Canadian Studies/Études Scandinaves au Canada” vol. 18, str. 44–54.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (2006). Povijest grčke filozofije. Sofisti – Sokrat. Prev. J. Bubalo, B. Malić, Z. Posinovec. Zagreb: Naklada Jurčić.
Ibsen, H. (1960). Hedda Gabler. U: Playwrights on Playwriting. The Meaning and Making of Moderm Drama from Ibsen to Ionesco. Ed. T. Cole. London: Macgibbon & Kee, str. 156–170.
Ibsen, H. (1978a). Divlja patka. U: Drame. Prev. Z. Mehmedbašić. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša, str. 237–324.
Ibsen, H. (1978b). The Complete Major Prose Plays. Prev. R. Fjelde. New York: New American Library.
Ibsen, H. (1987). Divlja patka. Prev. A. Katušić Balen. [Rukopis].
Klajn, H. (1968). Gospoda Glembajevi u svetlu dubinske psihologije. „Forum: mjesečnik Razreda za književnost Hrvatske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti” vol. 15, br. 1, str. 103–135.
Krleža, M. (1962). Glembajevi. Drame. Zagreb: Zora.
Lacan, J. (2007). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: The Other Side of Psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Moi, T. (2002). „It was as if he meant something different from what he said – all the timeˮ: Language, Metaphysics and the Everyday in The Wild Duck. „New Literary History” vol. 33, br. 4, str. 655–686. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2002.0042.
Matijašević, Ž. (2011/2012). Koja je prava boja nečiste krvi: Gospoda Glembajevi. „Drama – Slovensko narodno gledališče” br. 131. http://www.ffzg.unizg.hr/kompk/index.php?show=page.php&idPage=27. 15.12.2020
Pavlić, G. (2019). Glembajevi – dvojno čitanje. Zagreb: Akademija dramske umjetnosti–Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.
Platon (1979). Teetet ili O znanju: istraživački dijalog; Fileb ili O nasladi: etički dijalog. Prev. M. Sironić, V. Gortan. Zagreb: Naprijed.
Platon (1996). Simpozij. U: Eros i Filija. Prev. Z. Dukat. Zagreb: Demetra, str. 20–163.
Platon (2002). Država. Prev. A. Vilhar. Beograd: Kultura.
Podrug, B. (2016). Platonov Simpozij: Eros kao počelo filozofije. Zagreb: Demetra.
Ronen, R. (2018). Lacan with Philosophers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487516079.
Szlezàk, T. A. (2000). Čitati Platona. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk. Vidan, I. (1975). Ciklus o Glembajevima u svom evropskom kontekstu. U: Tekstovi u kontekstu: odjeci i odnosi u novijoj književnosti. Zagreb: Liber.
Wærp, L. P. (2020). The Struggle for Existence. Ibsen’s The Wild Duck (Vildanden, 1884). „Ibsen Studies” 20 (1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2020.175 7303.
Zupančič, A. (2006) When Surplus Enjoyment Meets Surplus Value. U: Jacques Lacan and the Other Side of Psychoanalysis. Eds J. Clemens, R. Grigg. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, str. 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387602-009.
Zwart, H. A. E. (2000). The Birth of a Research Animal: Ibsen’s The Wild Duck and the Origin of a New Animal Science. „Environmental Values” 9 (1), str. 91–108. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327100129341994.
License
Authors
The authors of the articles accepted for publication in the journal Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne are obliged to fill up the contract for providing the journal free licence (along with sub-licence CC) to works. The contract should be also signed by the authors and sent back to the editorial board of the journal.
Under the terms of the contract, the authors of the texts published in the journal “Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne” provide the University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań with a non-exclusive free licence and allow the aforementioned institution to use the sub-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
The authors hold the copyright for their texts.
Users
The Internet users are eligible for using the works published in “Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne” from 2015 under the following conditions:
- recognition of the authorship: the popularized work must contain information about the author, title, source (references to the original work, DOI) and licence.
- no derivative works may be created: the work must be preserved in its original form, the work’s translations or elaborations cannot be distributed without the author’s permission.
The copyright to the texts published before 2015 is reserved.
Other
The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań holds the right for the entire journal (its segmentation, graphical form, title, cover design, logo, etc.).