Smart beta funds – passive and effective portfolio management
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

smart beta
investment portfolio
investment efficiency

How to Cite

Trąpczyński, A. (2018). Smart beta funds – passive and effective portfolio management. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny I Socjologiczny, 80(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2018.80.2.16

Number of views: 458


Number of downloads: 929

Abstract

As a result of the technological development and the emergence of new theoretical concepts of investment funds strategies, a new category of funds, known as smart beta, has emerged. The foundation of their functioning assumes constructing an investment portfolio that replicates a specially developed index, the design of which is to ensure a higher investment  efficiency than that resulting from a typically passive investment. With the task of combining the ability to generate premium rates of return with a transparent structure and low management fees, smart beta funds are a very interesting hybrid of classical actively and passively managed funds. The interest of researchers and investors in these funds has been so far limited mainly to the United States. In the case of the Polish market – smart beta funds continue to remain a concept that is not widely known. This fact has become a prerequisite for disseminating knowledge about them in the Polish literature of the subject. The first part of the article presents the theoretical framework of smart beta funds as a consequence of a long-term evolution in portfolio management. Next, the general idea of the functioning of the smart beta funds is presented together with the outline of their place in the structure of the financial market segment. The main and the most extensive part of the article is based on literature studies and aims at an in-depth review of the key technical aspects related to the construction of an effective strategy used by smart beta funds.
https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2018.80.2.16
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Assness, C.S., Friedman J.A., Krail R.J., Liew J.M. (2000), Style timing: value versus growth, The Journal of Portfolio Management 26: 50–60.

Bailey, D.H. (2014), Pseudo-mathematics and financial charlatanism, American Mathematical Society 18.

Barosso, P., Santa-Clara, P. (2014), Momentum has its moments, Journal of Financial Economics 24.

Berk, J.B. (1995), A critique of size-related anomalies, Review of Financial Studies 8: 275–286.

Blitz, D., Van Vliet, P. (2010), Fundamental indexation: rebalancing assumptions and performance, The Journal of Index Investing 6.

Carhart, M.M. (1997), On persistence in mutual fund performance, Journal of Finance 52.

Cochrane, J.H. (2011), Presidential address: discount rates, Journal of Finance 66: 1047–1088.

DeMiguel, V.L., Garlappi, L. (2006), The moneyball of quality investing, Research Affiliates 12.

Dimson, E. i Hanke, B. (2004), The expected illiquidity premium: evidence from equity index-linked bonds, Review of Finance 8.

Fama E.F, French K.R. (1992), The cross-section of expected stock returns, Journal of Finance 47.

Frazzini, A., Pedersen L.H. (2004), Betting against beta, Journal of Financial Economics 111.

Harvey, C.R., Liu. Y, Zhu, H. (2015), Cross-section of expected returns, Journal of Financial Markets 44.

Hsu, J., Kalesnik, V. (2014), Finding smart beta in the factor zoo, Research Affiliates 11.

Hsu, J., Kalesnik V., Viswanathan, V. (2015), A framework for assessing factors ad implementing smart beta strategies, Research Affiliates 16.

Kalesnik V., Kose E. (2014), The moneyball of quality investing, Research Affiliates 13.

Markowitz, H. (1952), Portfolio selection, Journal of Finance 7.

Novy-Marx, R., Velikov, M. (2014), A taxonomy of anomalies and their trading costs, National Bureau of Economic Research 24.

Pastor, L. Stambaugh R.F. (2001), Liquidity risk and expected stock returns, National Bureau of Economic Research 8.

Pukthuanthong, K., Roll, R. (2014), A protocol for factor identification, Social Science Working Paper (1431).

Sharpe, W.F. (1964), Capital asset prices: a theory market equilibrium under conditions of risk, Journal of Finance 19.

Shumway, T., Warther, V.A. (1999), The delisting bias in CRSPs Nasdaq Data and its implication for size effect, Journal of Finance 54.