Some notes on ecophonetics: the problem of sound distinctiveness, sound sustainability, and the sustainability of vowel systems in contact conditions as exemplified by the standard Polish vowel system in contact with the Kashubian vowel system

Main Article Content

Stanisław Puppel


In the paper, an assumption is forwarded that if sound systems are brought to a contact setting, inter-entity distinctiveness is usually distorted. In the psycholinguistic sense of the word, it means that in the perception process, a particular sound of a less favoured system may be downgraded or even ridiculed. This generally places a given sound system in a weaker position sustainability-wise. It is assumed that the process may involve the presence and operation of the phenomenon of ethnic nepotism.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Puppel, S. (2018). Some notes on ecophonetics: the problem of sound distinctiveness, sound sustainability, and the sustainability of vowel systems in contact conditions as exemplified by the standard Polish vowel system in contact with the Kashubian vowel system. Studia Germanica Posnaniensia, (38), 143-150.
Artykuły naukowe


  1. Diefenbeck, James A. (1995): A subjective theory of organism. Lanham: University Press of America.
  2. Gould, Stephen Jay (2002): The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  3. Hunt, R. Reed/Worthen, James B. (eds.) (2006/2012): Distinctiveness and memory. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
  4. Jocz, Lechosław (2013): System samogłoskowy współczesnych gwar centralnokaszubskich. Lipsk.
  5. Lewis, Rebecca J. (2002): ”Beyond dominance: the importance of leverage”. The Quarterly Review of
  6. Biology 77.2., 149–164.
  7. Maddieson, Ian (1984): Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Martin, Alex/Cramazza, Alfonso (eds.) (2003): The organization of conceptual knowledge in the brain:
  9. neuropsychological and neuroimaging perspectives. A special issue of the journal Cognitive Neuropsychology. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  10. Patnaik, Surya N./Guptill, James D./Berke, Laszlo (1995): ”Merits and limitations of optimality criteria method for structural optimization”. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 38.18., 3087–3120.
  11. Perkell, Joseph S./Cohen, Marc H. (1989): ”An indirect test of the quantal nature of speech in the production of the vowels /i/, /a/, and /u/”. Journal of Phonetics 17, 123–133.
  12. Prager, William (1968): ”Optimality criteria in structural design”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. Applied Physical Sciences 61. 794–796.
  13. Puppel, Stanisław (1992): ”Construction of vowel systems in the universal vowel space: some typological remarks”. NORDLYD. Tromsø University Working Papers on Language and Linguistics 18. 1–14.
  14. Puppel, Stanisław/Jahr, Ernst Hakon (1997): ”Theory of Universal Vowel Space and the Norwegian and Polish vowel systems”. In: Hickey, Raymond/Puppel, Stanisław (eds.): Language history and linguistic modelling. A festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th birthday. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1301–1321.
  15. Puppel, Stanisław (2007): ”Tężyzna języków naturalnych” (The robustness of natural languages). In: Chałacińska-Wiertelak, Halina/Kropaczewski, Krzysztof (eds.): Dyskurs wielokulturowy. Prace Humanistycznego Centrum Badań. Łódź: Drukarnia i Wydawnictwo PIKTOR. 7–15.
  16. Puppel, Stanisław (2011): ”The universal natural language preservation mechanism: an ecological approach”. Transkomunikacja. W stronę sprofilowania przestrzeni publicznej jako wielopłaszczyznowej przestrzeni komunikacyjnej. Scripta de Communicatione Posnaniensi. Seria: Prace Naukowe Katedry Ekokomunikacji UAM. Poznań: Zakład Graficzny. 91–99.
  17. Salter, Frank (2007): On genetic interests: family, ethnicity, and humanity in an age of mass migration. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
  18. Sidanius, Jim/Pratto, Felicia (1999): Social dominance: an intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Sober, Elliott (1991): ”Organisms, individuals, and units of selection”. In: Tauber, Alfred I. (ed.): Organisms and the origins of self. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 275–296.
  20. Stevens, Kenneth N. (1972): ”The quantal nature of vowels: evidence from articulatory-acoustic data”. In: David, Edward E./Denes, Peter B. (eds.): Human communication: a unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill. 51–66.
  21. Stevens, Kenneth N. (1989): ”On the quantal nature of speech”. Journal of Phonetics 17, 3–45.
  22. Thoft-Christensen, Palle (ed.) (1987): Reliability and optimization of structural systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  23. Topolińska, Zuzanna (1967): ”Teksty gwarowe centralnokaszubskie z komentarzem fonologicznym”. Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiej 7, 88–125.
  24. Topolińska, Zuzanna (1974): A historical phonology of the Kashubian dialects of Polish. The Hague: Mouton.
  25. Trudgill, Peter (1991): ”Language maintenance and language shift”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 1.1., 61–69.
  26. Vandel, Patricia S. (2004): Prospects for an endangered language: the effects of stigmatization, group
  27. sentiment and standardization movements on the future of the Kashubian language. New Haven, CT:
  28. Yale University, Department of Linguistics.
  29. Vanhanen, Tatu (1999): Ethnic conflicts explained by ethnic nepotism. Stamford, CN: JAI Press.
  30. Vanhanen, Tatu (2012): Ethnic conflicts: their biological roots in ethnic nepotism. London: Ulster Institute for Social Research.
  31. Vanhanen, Tatu (2014): ”Ethnic nepotism as a cross-cultural background factor of ethnic conflicts”. Open Journal of Political Science 4, 143–155. Published online in SciRes: