Dramatis persona in poetical and practical approach of dramatic text in 17th century French theory of theatre
PDF (Français (France))

How to Cite

Bajer, M. (2009). Dramatis persona in poetical and practical approach of dramatic text in 17th century French theory of theatre. Studia Romanica Posnaniensia, 36, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2009.36.012

Abstract

The idea of the dramatis persona posited by the first French theatre theorists of the Richelieu circle, Jean Chapelain and Jules de la Mesnardiere, emerges as a quite literał implementation of the Aristotelian concepts unfolded in the sixth and fifteenth chapter of his Poetics. In a later period, the third of the aforementioned group of authors, François Hédelin d’Aubignac, dismisses the Aristotelian categories, erecting his theory upon the elements adopted from the Roman theory of rhetoric. The analysis of the Persona in classical drama theory allows to reconstruct the relation between these two 17th century dramatic approaches. The former is the traditional perspective relying on the postulations of the Aristotelian theory. The latter, which is a practical grasp, is new to the 17th century’s dramatic mindset, and was formulated by abbé d’Aubignac. Whereas the axis of poetics is the structural analysis of a work of art, it is the functioning of that work of art in the theatrical process of communication between the stage and the audience that remains the core interest of the practical approach. In this process, the rhetorical effect of presence of the dramatis persona should by created in the imagination of the spectator-auditor. The subject of analysis is common to both perspectives and the discrepancies concem merely aspects of its description. Therefore poetics and practice are neither competitive nor mutually exclusive, but can both legitimately coexist in the description of the very same work of art.
https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2009.36.012
PDF (Français (France))

References

Aristote (1980), La Poétique, Paris : Seuil.

D'Aubignac F.H. (1640), Discours sur la troisième comédie de Térence, Paris : Jean Camusat.

D'Aubignac F.H. (1663), Troisième dissertation concernant le poème dramatique [...] sur la tragédie de M. Corneille intitulée l'Oedipe, Paris : Jacques Du Brueil.

D’Aubignac F.H. (1996) (1927). La Pratique du Théâtre, Genève : Slatkine reprints.

D’Aubignac F.H. (2001), La Pratique du Théâtre, Paris : Honoré Champion.

Bury E. (dir.). (2007), Trente ans d'études rhétoriques. XVIIe siècle, 2007/3, n° 236.

Chapelain J. (1936), Opuscules critiques, Paris : Droz.

Cicéron M.T. (1994), De l'invention, Paris : Les Belles lettres.

Curtius E.R. (1956), La littérature européenne et le moyen âge latin, Paris : PUF.

Davidson H.M. (1977), « Pratique et rhétorique du théâtre. Etude sur le vocabulaire et la méthode de d'Aubignac », in : Critique et création littéraires au XVIIe siècle, C.N.R.S., Paris : Editions du CNRS.

Faulhaber Ch. (1972), Latin Rhetorical Theory in Thirteenth and Fourteenth Century Castile, Berkeley, Los Angeles : University of California Press.

Fumaroli M. (dir.), (1999), Histoire de la rhétorique dans l’Europe moderne. 1450-1950, Paris : PUF.

Goyet F. (1996), Le sublime du lieu commun : l’invention rhétorique dans l’Antiquité et à la Renaissance, Paris : H. Champion.

Hoogaert C. (2003), Rhétoriques de la tragédie, Paris : PUF.

La Mesnardière. 1639, La Poétique, Paris : Antoine de Sommaville.

Quintilien M.F. (1976a), De l’Institution oratoire. Tome 3, Livres IV—V, Paris : Les Belles Lettres.

Quintilien M.F. (1976b), De l'Institution oratoire. Tome 4, Livres VI-VII, Paris : Les Belles Lettres.

Quintilien M.F. (1979), De l'Institution oratoire. Tome 6, Livres X-XI, Paris : Les Belles Lettres.