Keywords
pen-and-paper writing
digital writing
working memory
language aptitude
How to Cite
Number of views: 845
Number of downloads: 1027
Abstract
It is unknown whether and to what extent cognitive individual differences may play different roles in paper versus computer-based second language (L2) writing. This exploratory study is a first attempt to explore this issue, focusing on the effects of working memory and language aptitude on the quality of paper versus computer-based L2 writing performance. Forty-two Spanish learners of L2 English performed a problem-solving task either digitally or on paper, took a working memory n-back test, and completed LLAMA tests to measure language aptitude. The quality of their L2 written texts was assessed in terms of complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) measures. The results indicated that the role of cognitive individual differences may vary depending on the writing environment.
References
Adams, A. M., & Guillot, K. (2008). Working memory and writing in bilingual students. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034417
Ahmaddian, M., & Vasylets, O. (2022). The role of cognitive individual differences in writing performance and written corrective feedback processing and use. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 139-151). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-17
Allen, D. (1992). Oxford Placement Test 1: Marking kit with user’s guide and diagnostic key. Oxford University Press.
Artieda, G., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The LLAMA tests and the underlying structure of language aptitude at two levels of foreign language proficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.023
Askvik, E., Van der Weel, F. R., & Van der Meer, A. L. (2020). The importance of cursive handwriting over typewriting for learning in the classroom: A high-density EEG study of 12-year-old children and young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01810
Atkinson, D. (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830932
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201
Baddeley, A. (2015). Working memory in second language learning. In Z. E. Wen, M. B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 17-28). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093595-005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093595-005
Barkaoui, K., & Knouzi, I. (2018). The effects of writing mode and computer ability on L2 test-takers’ essay characteristics and scores. Assessing Writing, 36, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.005
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617-645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83-118). Newbury House.
Chan, S., Chan, C., Derbie, A. Y., Hui, I., Tan, D., Pang, M., Lau, S., & Fong, K. (2017). Chinese calligraphy writing for augmenting attentional control and working memory of older adults at risk of mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease: JAD, 58(3), 735-746. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170024
Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018001004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018001004
Cheung, Y. L. (2012). Critical review of recent studies investigating effects of word processing-assisted writing and pen-and-paper writing on the quality of writing and higher-level revisions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1047-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.246
Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance. System, 72, 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.10.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.10.010
Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive sci-ence. Oxford University Press.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3328150 https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Early spelling acquisition: Writing beats the computer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 159-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.159
Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS ONE, 10(4). e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). Continuum.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gilabert, R. (2005). Evaluating the use of multiple sources and methods in needs analysis: A case study of journalists in the Autonomous Community of Catalonia (Spain). In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 182-199). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667299.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667299.007
Grañena, G. (2013). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLA-MA Language Aptitude Test. In G. Grañena & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 105-130). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.04gra DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.04gra
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Randall (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Erlbaum.
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
Hoskyn, M., & Swanson, H. L. (2003). The relationship between working memory and writing in younger and older adults. Reading and Writing, 16(8), 759-784. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027320226283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027320226283
Hou, J., Rashid, J., & Lee, K. M. (2017). Cognitive map or medium materiality? Reading on paper and screen. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.014
Ihara, A., Nakajima, K., Ishimaru, K., Osugi, K., & Naruse, Y. (2021). Advantage of handwriting over typing on learning words: Evidence from an N400 event-related potential index. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 679191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.679191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.679191
In’nami, Y., Hijikata, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2022). Working memory capacity and L2 reading: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(2), 381-406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000267
JASP Team (2021). JASP (Version 0.15) [Computer software].
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 64(1), 160-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034
Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21-46). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168648.003.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168648.003.0002
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57-71). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kiefer, M., Schuler, S., Mayer, C., Trumpp, N. M., Hille, K., & Sachse, S. (2015). Handwriting or typewriting? The influence of pen- or keyboard-based writing training on reading and writing performance in preschool children. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 11(4), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0178-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0178-7
Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003
Kormos, J. (2013). New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment. In G. Grañena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 131-152). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.05kor DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.05kor
Kormos, J. (2023). The role of cognitive factors in second language writing and writing to learn a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism, 11(2), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003416
Kormos, J., & Trebits, A. (2012). The role of task complexity, modality, and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62(2), 439-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00695.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00695.x
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299234
Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 801-842. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500042X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500042X
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861-883. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2
Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J. C., & Velay, J. L. (2006). Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Human Movement Science, 25(4-5), 646-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.007
Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
Lu, Y. (2015). Working memory, cognitive resources and L2 writing performance. In A. Wen, Z., Mota, M., & Mcneill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 175-188). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093595-014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093595-014
Mangen, A. (2016). What hands may tell us about reading and writing. Educational Theory, 66(4), 457-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12183
Mangen, A., & Balsvik, L. (2016). Pen or keyboard in beginning writing instruction? Some perspectives from embodied cognition. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5(3), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2016.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2016.06.003
Mangen, A., & Velay, J. L. (2010). Digitizing literacy: Reflections on the haptics of writing. In M. H. Zadeh (Ed.), Advances in haptics (pp. 386-401). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/8710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/8710
Mavrou, I. (2020). Working memory, executive functions, and emotional intelligence in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100758
McKay, T., & Plonsky, L. (2021). Reliability analyses: Estimating error in L2 research. In P. Winke & T. Brunfaut (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing (pp. 468-482). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034784-50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034784-50
Meara, P. M. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Lognostics.
Michel, M., Kormos, J., Brunfaut, T., & Ratajczak, M. (2019). The role of working memory in young second language learners’ written performances. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.002
Mizumoto, A. (in press). Calculating the relative importance of multiple regression predictor variables using dominance analysis and random forests. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12518
Nishino, T., & Atkinson, D. (2015). Second language writing as sociocognitive alignment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.002
Papi, M., Vasylets, O., & Ahmaddian, M. (2022). Individual difference factors for second language writing. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 381-395). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546-30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546-30
Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H. L., Dardick, W., & Tao, S. (2018). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 48-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000124
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878-912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46-73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000036
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3-37). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1
Shin, J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and second language reading comprehension: Does task type matter? Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(4), 873-900. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000272
Skehan, P. (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences in instructed language learning (pp. 69-95). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.06ske DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.06ske
UCLES. (2001). Oxford quick placement test. Oxford University Press.
Vanderberg, R., & Swanson, H. L. (2007). Which components of working memory are important in the writing process? Reading and Writing, 20(7), 721-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9046-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9046-6
Vasylets, O., & Marín, J. (2021). The effects of working memory and L2 proficiency on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52. 100786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100786
Vasylets, O., & Marín, J. (2022). Pen-and-paper versus computer-mediated writing modality as a new dimension of task complexity. Languages, 7(3), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030195
Weigle, S. (2005). Second language writing expertise. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 128-149). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523470_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523470_7
Wen, Z. E., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 50(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000276
Williams, J. (2015). Working memory in SLA research: Challenges and prospects. In Z. E. Wen, M. B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 301-308). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093595-021
Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(58). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, & complexity. University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Yang, Y., Sun, Y., Chang, P., & Li, Y. (2019). Exploring the relationship between language aptitude, vocabulary size, and EFL graduate students’ L2 writing performance. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 845-856. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.510
Zabihi, R. (2018). The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Writ-ten Communication, 35(1), 32-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317735836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317735836
Zhi, M., & Huang, B. H. (2021). Investigating the authenticity of computerand paper-based ESL writing tests. Assessing Writing, 50(1), 100548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100548
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.