Abstract
This article proposes a new division of currently available forms of open access (OA), from the green road and gold OA, through diamond, brown and hybrid paths, up to undesirable pathological phenomena occurring in OA. A particular attention is given to the latter group with a presentation of the manifestations of digital piracy, social media networks for scientists termed as the black OA, and predatory journals and dishonesty in science. The debate on illegal ways of sourcing via OA currently under way in scientific circles shows that there is a growing need for an introduction of changes to be implemented in the open publishing model to prevent its further possible abuse.
References
Björk B.C., Gold, green, and black open access, „Learned Publishing” 2017, t. 30 (2), s. 173–175, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1096 [dostęp: 29.05.2018].
Bohannon J., Who’s afraid of peer review?, „Science” 2013, t. 342 (6154), s. 60–65, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154.60 [dostęp: 2.06.2018].
Bohannon J., The frustrated science student behind Sci-Hub, „Science” 2016, t. 352 (6285), s. 511, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6285.511 [dostęp: 30.05.2108].
Bohannon J., Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone, „Science” 2016, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5664 [dostęp: 2.06.218].
Burdzik T., Drapieżne czasopisma jako przykład nieetycznego publikowania, „Filozofia i Nauka” 2017, t. 5, s. 131–149, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5155939 [dostęp: 30.05.2018].
Clark J., Predatory journals and developing country research, „In 5th WCRI” 2017, t. 3, https://wcrif.org/images/2017/documents/1.Monday.May.29.2017/3.Auditorium/J.Clark.Predatory.journals.and.research.in.developing.countries.pdf [dostęp: 29.05.2018].
Dunn A., Coiera E., Mandl K., Is Biblioleaks inevitable?, „Journal of Medical Internet Research” 2014, t. 16 (4), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24755534 [dostęp: 10.06.2018].
Faust J.S., Sci-Hub: A Solution to the Problem of Paywalls, or Merely a Diagnosis of a Broken System, „Annals of Emergency Medicine” 2016, t. 68 (1), A15–A17, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANNEMERGMED.2016.05.010 [dostęp: 30.05.2018].
Henderson E., Pirate website offering millions of academic papers for free refuses to close despite lawsuit, „The Independent” 2016, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/pirate-website-offering-millions-of-academic-papers-for-freerefuses-to-close-despite-law-suit-a6875001.html [dostęp: 10.06.2018].
Himmelstein D.S. et al., Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature, „eLife” 2018, t. 7, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32822 [dostęp: 29.05.2018].
Gutierrez F.R.S., Beall J., Forero D.A., Spurious alternative impact factors: The scale of the problem from an academic perspective, „BioEssays” 2015, http://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201500011 [dostęp: 10.06.2018].
Jalalian M., The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them, „Electronic Physician” 2015, t. 7 (2), s. 1069–1072, https://doi.org/10.14661/2015.1069-1072 [dostęp: 2.06.2018].
Kulczycki E., Kariera drapieżnych czasopism – przypadek Anny O. Szust, „Nauka” 2017, t. 3, s. 71–83, https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/handle/10593/19269 [dostęp:2.06.2018].
Laakso M., Björk B.C., Delayed open access: An overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature, „Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology” 2013, t. 64 (7), s. 1323–1329, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22856 [dostęp: 25.05.2018].
Lawson S., Access, ethics and piracy, „Insights the UKSG Journal” 2017, t. 30 (1), s. 25–30, https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.333 [dostęp: 10.06.2018].
Manca S., ResearchGate and Academia.edu as networked socio-technical systems for scholarly communication: a literature review, „Research in Learning Technology” 2018, t. 26, s. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2008 [dostęp:10.06.2018].
McKenzie L., Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription journals are doomed, data analyst suggests, „Science” 2017, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan7164 [dostęp: 10.06.2018].
Moher D., Srivastava A., You are invited to submit…, „BMC Medicine” 2015, t. 13 (1), s. 180, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0423-3 [dostęp: 10.06.2018].
Omobowale A.O. et al., Peripheral scholarship and the context of foreign paid publishing in Nigeria, „Current Sociology” 2014, t. 62 (5), s. 666–684, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113508127 [dostęp: 2.06.2018].
Oxenham, S., Meet the Robin Hood of Science, 2017, http://bigthink.com//a-pirate--bay-for-science [dostęp: 30.05.2018].
Packer A.L. et al., SciELO – 15 Years of Open Access: an analytic study of Open Access and scholarly communication. UNESCO 2014, https://doi.org/10.7476/9789230012373 [dostęp: 3.06.2018].
Penn L., Alternative Ways of Obtaining Scholarly Articles and the Impact on Traditional Publishing Models from a UK/European Perspective, „Serials Review” 2018, t. 44 (1), s. 40–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2018.1433906 [29.05.2018].
Perlin M.S., Imasato T., Borenstein D., Is predatory publishing a real threat? Evidence from a large database study, „Scientometrics” 2018, s. 1–19, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2750-6 [dostęp: 2.06.2018].
Piwowar H. et al., The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles, „PeerJ” 2018, t. 6, e4375, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375 [dostęp: 25.05.2018].
Rozkosz E., Serwisy społecznościowe dla naukowców (SSN) na przykładzie Research- -Gate i Academia.edu, „Forum Bibliotek Medycznych” 2014, t. 14 (2), http://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media/files/Forum_Bibliotek_Medycznych/Forum_Bibliotek_Medycznych-r2014-t7-n2_pdf [dostęp: 2.06.2018].
Shamseer L. et al., Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison, „BMC Medicine” 2017, t. 15 (1), s. 28, http://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9 [dostęp: 2.06.2018].
Shen C., Björk B.C., „Predatory” open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics, „BMC Medicine” 2015, t. 13 (1), s. 230, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2 [dostęp: 2.06.2018].
Siewicz K., Otwarty dostęp do publikacji naukowych. Kwestie prawne, Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego 2012, http://repozytorium.ceon.pl/bitstream/handle/123456789/335/K_Siewicz_Otwarty_dostep_do_publikacji_naukowych.pdf?sequence=4 [dostęp: 29.05.2018].
Sorokowski P. et al., Predatory journals recruit fake editor, „Nature” 2017, t. 543 (7646), s. 481–483, https://doi.org/10.1038/543481a [dostęp: 4.06.2018].
Swartz A., Guerilla Open Access Manifesto, https://openaccessmanifesto.wordpress.com/manifest-otwartego-dostepu/ [dostęp: 29.05.2018].
Sygocki W., Korzeniewska E., Impact Factor (IF) true or false?, „Przegląd Elektrotechniczny” 2018, t. 1 (1), s. 107–110, https://doi.org/10.15199/48.2018.01.27 [dostęp: 2.06.2018].
Xia J. et al., Who publishes in „predatory” journals?, „Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology” 2015, t. 66 (7), s. 1406–1417, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265 [dostęp: 2.06.2018].
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Małgorzata Rychlik, Monika Theus

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Works published in the journal Biblioteka on the PRESSto platform of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań since 2015 are made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). 
Accordingly, all interested parties are entitled to use works published since 2015, subject to the following conditions:
- Attribution — users must provide appropriate credit when redistributing the work, including the author’s name, the title of the work, the source (with a link to the original work and its DOI), and the applicable license.
- ShareAlike — when remixing, transforming, or building upon the work, users must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original work.
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań retains copyright in the journal as a whole, including its layout, graphic design, title, cover design, logo, etc.
Authors retain their economic rights to their works while granting Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań permission to use and publish their works. Authors whose submissions have been accepted for publication are required to complete, sign, and submit the relevant publishing agreement.
If an author is uncertain whether they may lawfully use third-party works (e.g. illustrations, photographs, or tables) within their manuscript under the right of quotation, they must obtain and provide the journal's editorial board with permission from the relevant rights holders.
All rights are reserved with respect to texts published before 2015.