Open publishing at the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

open access
open science
scholarly communication
bibliometrics
AMU Research Portal
CRIS
Unpaywall

How to Cite

Rychlik, M. (2022). Open publishing at the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. Biblioteka, (25 (34), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.14746/b.2021.25.12

Number of views: 303


Number of downloads: 180

Abstract

Open Access as a publishing model for scholarly communication has become a staple of modern publication, dissemination and discovery of academic research. This article is an attempt to use all available tools to analyse the publishing output of the researchers of the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań as regards its full-text availability and the determination of the status of open publications. The methods: The initial stage of the study involved downloading 9,488 DOI identification numbers from the AMU Knowledge Database, which comprised 70.46 per cent of all the articles within the chronological bracket under examination (2017–2020). The second stage involved downloading data from the Web of Science and Scopus data bases, whereas the third stage involved the use of the Unpaywall’s Simple Query tool (https://unpaywall.org/), i.e. the tool that provides data on whether an open version of an article exists based on the article’s DOI , to establish the Open Access Status for the sample under investigation. All data were retrieved on March
25, 2021. The results: 63% of the study samples included open articles, available in full-text in legitimate sources for academic literature. Closed articles included 29.7% of the research output under investigation. The open articles were categorised into the following four types: gold, green, brown and hybrid. In the sample under scrutiny, the most common type of open access model was that of the gold open access
model, while its proportion increased from 51% in 2017 to 61% in 2020. The Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan emerged as the most popular publisher that produced open articles (more than 22% of articles). The largest number of closed articles has been published by Elsevier (37%). The basic limitation was the impossibility of analyzing all published articles, but only those articles that were provided with their
DOI identification numbers.

https://doi.org/10.14746/b.2021.25.12
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Archambault É. et al., Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels – 1996–2013, 2014, https://tinyurl.com/4csm3sfr.

Björk B.C., Growth of hybrid open access, 2009–2016, „PeerJ” 2017, t. 5 (9). DOI : https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.3878.

Bosman J., Kramer B., Open access levels: a quantitative exploration using Web of Science and oaDOI data, „PeerJ” 2018. DOI : https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3520v1.

Chawla D.S., Unpaywall finds free versions of paywalled papers, „Nature” 2017. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.21765.

Dhakal K., Unpaywall, „Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA ” 2019, t. 107, nr 2, s. 286–288. DOI : https://doi.org/10.5195/JMLA .2019.650.

Else H., How Unpaywall is transforming open science, „Nature” 2018, t. 560, z. 7718, s. 290–291. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3.

Hobert A. et al., Open access uptake in Germany 2010–2018: adoption in a diverse research landscape, „Scientometrics” 2021. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04002-0.

Maddi A., Lardreau E., Sapinho D., Open access in Europe: a national and regional comparison, „Scientometrics” 2021, t. 126, nr 4, s. 3131–3152. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03887-1.

Martín-Martín A. et al., Evidence of open access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: A large-scale analysis, „Journal of Informetrics” 2018, t. 12, z. 3, s. 819–841. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.012.

Mongeon P., Paul-Hus A., The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis, „Scientometrics” 2015, t. 106, nr 1, s. 213–228. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.

Nazim M., Analysing open access uptake by academic and research institutions in India, „DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology” 2021, t. 41, nr 2, s. 108–115. DOI : https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.02.16324.

Piwowar H. et al., The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles, „PeerJ” 2018, t. 6. DOI : https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375.

Pölönen J. et al., Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers, „Quantitative Science Studies” 2020, t. 1 (4), s. 1396–1428. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00084.

Robinson-Garcia N., Costas R., van Leeuwen T.N., Open Access uptake by universities worldwide, „PeerJ” 2020, t. 7. DOI : https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9410.

Robinson-Garcia N., van Leeuwen T.N., Torres-Salinas D., Measuring Open Access Uptake: Data Sources, Expectations, and Misconceptions, „Scholarly Assessment Reports” 2020, t. 2 (1). DOI : https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.23.

Rovira A., Labastida I., The open access observatory, „LI BER Quarterly” 2019, t. 29, nr 1, s. 1–18. DOI : https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10295.

Sivertsen G., Developing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) as Data Sources for Studies of Research, w: Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators, red. W. Glänzel et al., Cham 2019, s. 667–683. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_25.

White R.K.A. et al., Only two out of five articles by New Zealand researchers are free-to-access: a multiple API study of access, citations, cost of Article Processing Charges (APC), and the potential to increase the proportion of open access, „PeerJ” 2021, t. 9, DOI : https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.11417.