Adolescent learner perceptions of foreign language assessment: Critical incident analysis

Main Article Content



This article reports on a study that aimed to explore adolescent learner perceptions of language assessment experiences and their beliefs about what makes a useful, valuable and highquality assessment. The data was collected by means of the critical incident technique (CIT) in which 25 lower secondary learners (aged 14–16) were asked to recall both positive and negative instances of assessment they had experienced in the course of their language education. The results reveal that the participants held generally positive views of language assessment and paid attention to such aspects of assessment as reliability, appreciation and authenticity. On the other hand, the importance of grades was prioritised over the learning value of assessment, which is characteristic of performance-oriented assessment environment


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
CZURA, A. (1). Adolescent learner perceptions of foreign language assessment: Critical incident analysis. Glottodidactica. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 44(2), 25-39.


  1. Alkharusi, H. (2011). Development and datametric properties of a scale measuring students’ perceptions of the classroom assessment environment. International Journal of Instruction, 4(1), pp. 105–120.
  2. Alkharusi, H. (2015). Classroom assessment communication, perceived assessment environment, and academic achievement: A path analysis. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 8(2), pp. 117–126. DOI:10.9734/bjesbs/2015/17670.
  3. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Carless, D. / Lam, R. (2012). The examined life: perspectives of lower primary school students in Hong Kong. Education, 42(3), pp. 313–329. DOI:10.1080/03004279.2012.689988.
  5. Chell, E. (1998). Critical incident technique. In: G. Symon / C. Cassell (ed.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research (pp. 51–72). London: Sage.
  6. Cheng, L. / Wu, Y. / Liu, X. (2015). Chinese university students’ perceptions of assessment tasks and classroom assessment environment. Language Testing in Asia, 5(1), pp. 1–17. DOI:10.1186/s40468-015-0020-6.
  7. Coleman, J. / Hendry, L. (1990). The nature of adolescence. Second edition. London: Routledge.
  8. Czura, A. (2013). Implementing portfolio assessment in lower-secondary school. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 10(1), pp. 83–94. DOI:10.4312/elope. 10.1.83-94.
  9. Dorman, J. P. / Knightley, W. M. (2006). Initial use of the Perceptions of Assessment Tasks Inventory (PATI) in English secondary schools. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 52(3), pp. 196–199.
  10. Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, pp. 201–204.
  11. Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). Critical incidents in ELT initial teacher training. ELT Journal, 62(1), pp. 3–10.
  12. Finch, A. (2010). Critical incidents and language learning: Sensitivity to initial conditions. System, 38(3), pp. 422–431.
  13. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), pp. 327–358.
  14. Gabryś-Barker, D. (2012). Reflectivity in pre-service teacher education. A survey of theory and practice. Katowice: University of Silesia Press.
  15. Huhta, A. / Kalaja, P. / Pitkänen-Huhta, A. (2006). Discursive construction of a high-stakes test: the many faces of a test-taker. Language Testing, 23(3), pp. 326–350.
  16. Kuchuk, A. (2012). Politeness in intercultural communication: Some insights into the pragmatics of English as an international language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona, Tucson.
  17. Lizzio, A. / Wilson, K. (2013). First-year students’ appraisal of assessment tasks: implications for efficacy, engagement and performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(4), pp. 389–406.
  18. McAllister, L. / Whiteford, G. / Hill, B. / Thomas, N. / Fitzgerald, M. (2006). Refection in intercultural learning: Examining the international experience through a critical incident approach. Reflective Practice, 7(3), pp. 367–381.
  19. McClure, J. W. (2007). International graduates’ cross-cultural adjustment: experiences, coping strategies, and suggested programmatic responses. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(2), pp. 199–217. DOI:10.1080/13562510701191976.
  20. McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In: R. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13-103). New York: American Council on Education.
  22. Pollard, A. / Triggs, P. (2000). What pupils say: Changing policy and practice in primary education. London & New York: Continuum.
  23. Stiggins, R. J. / Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers’ hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  24. Struyven, K. / Dochy, F. / Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review1. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), pp. 325–341. DOI:10.1080/02602930500099102.
  25. Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgment. New York: Routledge.
  26. Xiao, Y. / Carless D. R. (2013). Illustrating students’ perceptions of English language assessment: Voices from China. RELC Journal, 44(3), pp. 319–340.