Enhancing the role of pragmatics in primary English teacher training

Main Article Content

Karen Glaser

Abstrakt

Teaching EFL in primary school is no longer a novelty but firmly established in the education landscape throughout Europe and many countries worldwide. Primary English language teaching (PELT) is a unique branch of ELT insofar as it entails both the teaching of children and beginners. While PELT teachers and PELT teacher educators largely agree that this concurrence of ‘young plus beginning’ requires a focus on vocabulary, speaking and listening, introduced and practiced through songs, games, stories, roleplaying and embodiment techniques such as Total Physical Response, pragmatic aspects often take a backseat in PELT teacher training and by extension in the PELT classroom, even though it has been established that pragmatics instruction is necessary and feasible on all proficiency levels, right from the beginning. This article discusses possible reasons for this omission and illustrates with authentic examples why pragmatics should play a bigger role in the training of primary English teachers

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Dział
Artykuły

Bibliografia

  1. Bachman, L. F. / Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  3. Carroll, D. (2011). Teaching preference organization: Learning how not to say “no”. In: N. Houck / D. Tatsuki (eds.), Pragmatics: Teaching natural conversation (pp. 105–118). Alexandria: TESOL.
  4. Cenoz, J. / Lindsay, D. (1996). English in primary school: Teaching a third language to eight years olds in the Basque country. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa, 5 (1), 81–102.
  5. Cohen, A. D. (2018). Learning pragmatics from native and non-native language teachers. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  6. Dausend, H. (2017). Theory and practice in primary English teacher education. A review of empirical research until 2015. In: E. Wilden / R. Porsch (eds.), The professional development of primary EFL teachers: National and international research (pp. 109–125). Münster: Waxmann.
  7. Edelenbos, P. / Johnstone, R. / Kubanek, A. (2006). The main pedagogical principles underlying the teaching of languages to very young learners. European Commission, Education and Culture, Culture and Communication Multilingualism Policy. http://p21208.typo3server.info/fileadmin/content/assets/eu_language_policy/key_documents/studies/2007/young_en.pdf.
  8. Enever, J. (2014). Primary English teacher education in Europe. ELT Journal, 68 (3), 231–42.
  9. Eslami, Z. R. / Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2008). Enhancing the pragmatic competence of non-native English-speaking teacher candidates (NNESTCs) in an EFL context. In: E. Alcón-Soler / A. Martínez-Flor (eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 178–197). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  10. Flöck, I. / Pfingsthorn, J. (2014). Pragmatik und Englischunterricht. In: W. Gehring / M. Merkl (eds.), Englisch lehren, lernen, erforschen (pp. 175–199). Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.
  11. Gass, S. M. / Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  12. Glaser, K. (2014). Inductive or deductive? The impact of method of instruction on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in EFL. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  13. Ishihara, N. (2013). Is it rude language? Children learning pragmatics through visual narratives. TESL Canada Journal, 30 (7), 135–149.
  14. Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? NetWork #6. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa, NFLRC. http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/networks/NW06/default.html.
  15. Kubanek, A. (2017). 25 years of ‘new’ young learner classrooms. Insights and challenges for teacher education. In: E. Wilden / R. Porsch (eds.), The professional development of primary EFL teachers: National and international research (pp. 27–44). Münster: Waxmann.
  16. Lee, C. (2010). An exploratory study of the interlanguage pragmatic comprehension of young learners of English. Pragmatics, 20 (3), 343–373.
  17. Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman.
  18. Llinares García, A. (2006). A pragmatic analysis of children's interlanguage in EFL preschool contexts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3 (2), 171–193.
  19. Martí-Arnándiz, O. (2008). Grammatical and pragmatic competence in EFL contexts: Do they really go hand in hand? In: E. Alcón-Soler (ed.), Learning how to request in an instructed language learning context (pp. 163–189). Bern: Peter Lang.
  20. Pfingsthorn, J. / Flöck, I. (2017). Die Bemessung pragmatischer Sprachbewusstheit: Precision und recall im metalinguistischen Beurteilungstest. Paper presented at the 27th Conference of the DGFF [German Association for Foreign Language Research], Jena, Germany.
  21. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In: J. M. Atkinson / J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Povolná, R. (2012). Pragmatic awareness in teacher education. Acta Academica Karviniensia, 12 (1), 148–158.
  23. Taguchi, N. (2010). Longitudinal studies in interlanguage pragmatics. In: A. Trosborg (ed.), Pragmatics across languages and cultures (volume 7: Handbooks of Pragmatics, pp. 333–361). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  24. Wong, J. (2002). Applying conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. IRAL, 40 (1), 37–60.