Słowa kluczowe
language learning
language teaching
learning goals
educational attainment
formative evaluation
classroom assessment
teacher education
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
The text analyzes routes and ways of processing feedback as well as discusses the most important psychological, pedagogical and linguistic factors influencing the effectiveness of feedback in developing learner autonomy and determining its impact on cognitive and affective processes in the learner. It also sets out to assess the place of feedback in the evaluation of educational attainment and to identify ways of promoting so-called formative feedback, both on the school-level and in the language classroom. Implications for developing teacher autonomy via pre- and in-service teacher education are also sought
Bibliografia
Alderson, C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. London: Continuum.
Alismail, H. A. / McGuire, P. (2015). 21st century standards and curriculum: Current research and practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6, 150–154.
Allal, L. / López, L. M. (2015). Formative assessment of learning. A review of publications in French. In: OECD (ed.), Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 241–264). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Askew, S. (ed.) (2000). Feedback for learning. London: Routledge.
Bachman, L. / Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Developing language tests and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berger, Ch. R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction. Attaining goals through communicative action. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Black, P. (2010). Assessment of and for learning: Improving the quality and achieving a positive interaction. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General Education and Culture.
Black, P. / Harrison, C. / Lee, C. / Marshall, B. / Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning. Putting it into practice. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Black, P. / Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7–71.
Black, P. / Wiliam, D. (2015). Changing teaching through formative assessment. Research and practice. In: OECD (ed.), Formative assessment. Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 223–240). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Bloom, B. S. / Englehart, M. D. / Furst, H. J. / Hill, W. H. / Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David MacKay.
Bloom, B. S. / Englehart, M. D. / Furst, H. J. / Hill, W. H. / Krathwohl, D. R. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David MacKay.
Bloom, B. S. / Hasting, J. T. / Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGrawHill Book.
Chappuis, J. (2012). How am I doing? Educational Leadership, 70, 36–41.
Crookes, G. (2003). A practicum in TESOL. Professional development through teaching practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dann, R. (2002). Promoting assessment as learning. Improving the learning process. London: Routledge.
Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning. Using classroom assessment to maximize learning. London: Corvin Press.
Gan, Z. (2013). Learning to teach English language in the practicum. What challenges do nonnative ESL student teachers face? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 92–108.
Ginott, H. (1972). Between parent and child. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Griffin, E. (2001). A first look at communication theory. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Haden, P. (2007). The quotable artist. New York: Allworth Press.
Harks, B. / Rakoczy, K. / Hattie, J. / Besser, M. / Klieme, E. (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, 34 (3), 269–290.
Haslam, S. A. / Wegge, J. / Postmes, T. (2009). Are we on a learning curve or a treadmill? The benefits of participative group goal setting become apparent as tasks become increasingly challenging over time. The European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 430–446.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Hattie, J. / Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112.
Heritage, M. (2013). Formative assessment in practice. A process of inquiry and action. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Herman, J. / Osmundson, E. / Silver, D. (2010). Capturing quality in formative assessment practice. Measurement challenges. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation.
Herman, J. / Ripley M. (2012). Assessment and teaching of the 21st century. New York: Springer Publishers.
Heyworth, F. (2013). Applications of quality management for language education. Language Teaching, 46, 281–315.
Köller, O. (2015). Formative assessment in classrooms. A review of the empirical German literature. In: OECD (ed.), Formative assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms (pp. 265–279). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Laveault, D. / Allal, L. (2016). Assessment for learning. Meeting the challenge of implementation. Hamilton: Springer.
Lewis, E. G. / Massad, C. E. (1975). The teaching of English as a foreign language in ten countries. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Little, D. / Dam, L. / Legenhausen, L. (2017). Learner autonomy. Theory, practice and research. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Locke, E. A. (2000). Motivation, cognition and action. An analysis of studies on task goals and knowledge. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 49, 408–429.
Looney, J. (2009). Assessment and innovation in education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Looney, J. (2011). Integrating formative and summative evaluation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Looney, J. / Laneve, C. / Moscato, M. T. (2015). Italy: A system in transition. In: OECD (ed.), Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 163–176). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Looney, J. / Wiliam, D. (2015). England: Implementing formative assessment in high stakes environment. In: OECD (ed.), Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 129–148). Paris: OECD Publishing.
MacIntyre, P. D. / Mercer, S. (2014). Introducing positive psychology to SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 153–172.
Mercer, S. / Oberdorfer, P. / Saleem, M. (2016). Helping language teachers to thrive: Using positive psychology to promote teachers’ professional well-being. In D. Gabryś-Barker / D. Gałajda (ed.), Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 211–229). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Muresan, L. (2007). QUALITRAINING – A training guide for quality assurance. Graz: Council of Europe.
Nevo, D. (ed.) (2002). School-based evaluation. An international perspective. Oxford: JAI Press.
OECD (2008). Trends shaping education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2010). Education at a glance. OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2015). Formative assessment. Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: OECD Publishing.
O’Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park: Sage.
Orlova, N. (2015). In search of a better practicum. Student teachers’ views and beliefs. In: C. Haase / N. Orlova / J. Head (ed.), ELT: New horizons in theory and application (pp. 227–242). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Orlova, N. (2018). Teacher student views on what makes a good host teacher. In: C. Haase / N. Orlova / J. Head (ed.), The foundations and versatility of English language teaching (ELT) (pp. 147–164). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research. Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
Petty, R. E. / Caccioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
Petty, R. E. / Wegener, D. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model. Current status and controversies. In: S. Chaiken / Y. Trope (ed.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York: Guilford.
Sadler, R. (1998). Formative assessment. Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5, 77–84.
Scallon, G. (2000). L’évaluation formative. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. AERA Monograph Series on Evaluation, 1, 39–83.
Sebba, J. / Maxwell, G. (2015). Queensland, Australia: An outcomes-based curriculum. In: OECD (ed.), Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 191–204). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Sedikides, C. / Green, J. D. (2004). What I don’t recall can’t hurt me. Information negativity versus information inconsistency as determinants of memorial self-defense. Social Cognition, 22, 4–29.
Sedikides, C. / Skowronski, J. A. (2009). Social cognition and self-cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1245–1249.
Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63 (3), 66–70.
Sherif, C. / Sherif, M. / Nebergall, R. (1965). Attitude and attitude change. The social judgmentinvolvement approach. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Shute, V. (2007). Focus on formative feedback. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Sliwka, A. / Fushell, M. / Gauthier, M. / Johnson, R. (2015). Canada: Encouraging the use of summative data for formative purposes. In: OECD (ed.), Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 97–116). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Sliwka, A. / Spencer, E. (2015). Scotland: Developing a coherent system of assessment. In: OECD (ed.), Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 205–222). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Spitzberg, B. H. / Cupach, W. R. (2007). The dark side of interpersonal communication. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sterna, D. (2016). Uczyć się uczyć. Ocenianie kształtujące w praktyce. Warszawa: Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej.
Townshend, J. / Moos, L. / Skov, P. (2015). Denmark: Building on a tradition of democracy and dialogue in schools. In: OECD (ed.), Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 117–128). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Tunstall, P. / Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment. A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22, 389–404.
Venables, L. / Fairclough, S. (2009). The influence of performance feedback on goal-setting and mental effort regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 33 (1), 63–74.
Vidmar, D. J. (2005). Reflective peer coaching. Crafting collaborative self-assessment in teaching. Research Strategies, 20 (3), 135–148.
Wiliam, D. (2010). The role of formative assessment in effective learning environments. In: H. Dumont / D. Istance / F. Benavides (ed.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 135–159). Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation CERI, OECD Publishing.
Wilson, E. K. (2006). The impact of an alternative model of student teacher supervision. View of the participants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 22–31.
Zellermayer M. (1989). The study of teachers’ written feedback to students’ writing: changes in theoretical considerations and the expansion of research contexts. Instuctional Science, 18, 45–65.
Licencja
Autorzy
Autorzy tekstów przyjętych do publikacji w czasopiśmie Glottodidactica są zobowiązani do wypełnienia, podpisania i odesłania na adres redakcji umowy o udzielenie nieodpłatnej licencji do utworów, z zobowiązaniem do udzielania sublicencji CC.
Zgodnie z umową, autorzy tekstów opublikowanych w czasopiśmie Glottodidactica udzielają Uniwersytetowi im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu niewyłącznej i nieodpłatnej licencji oraz zezwalą na użycie sublicencji Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Autorzy zachowują prawa do dalszego, swobodnego rozporządzania utworem.
Użytkownicy
Zainteresowani użytkownicy internetu uprawnieni są do korzystania z utworów opublikowanych od 2015 roku w Glottodidactica pod następującymi warunkami:
- uznanie autorstwa - obowiązek podania wraz z rozpowszechnionym utworem, informacji, o autorstwie, tytule, źródle (odnośniki do oryginalnego utworu, DOI) oraz samej licencji;
- bez tworzenia utworów zależnych - utwór musi być zachowany w oryginalnej postaci, nie można bez zgody twórcy rozpowszechniać np. tłumaczeń, opracowań.
Do wszystkich tekstów opublikowanych przed 2015 r. prawa autorskie są zastrzeżone.
Inne
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu zachowuje prawo do czasopisma jako całości (układ, forma graficzna, tytuł, projekt okładki, logo itp.).