Zum Phasen-Modell in der Syntax

Main Article Content

Paweł Mecner


The article examines some aspects of the modern syntax and algorithmic modeling. In 1974, in Dedham, Massachusetts, an international meeting took place which paved the way for the interdisciplinary research field of biolinguistics. The key focus area was syntax, its hierarchical structure and system of discrete infinity, unusual for the biological world. Here, some aspects of computational efficiency are analyzed in recent generative frameworks: operation Merge, the probe-goal system and the concept of the phase, among others. The aim of this article is to investigate an intriguing structure with final subject of unaccusatives in Yiddish, a Germanic language with Slavonic influences, and to show phase structures, feature inheritance, probe-goal, and a cyclic transfer system


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Mecner, P. (2018). Zum Phasen-Modell in der Syntax. Glottodidactica. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 45(2), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2018.45.2.13


  1. Belletti, A. (2004). Aspects of the low IP area. In: L. Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures (S. 16–51). Vol. 2. New York: Oxford.
  2. Boeckx, C. (2012). Phases beyond explanatory adequacy. In: Á. Gallego (ed.), Phase Theory: Developing the Framework (S. 45–66). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  3. Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In: R. Martin / D. Michaels / J. Uriagereka (ed.), Step by step (S. 89–156). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  4. Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In: M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (S. 1–52). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  5. Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In: A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures. Vol. 3 (S. 104–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22.
  7. Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG from below. In: U. Sauerland / H.-M. Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces+recursion=language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics (S. 1–30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  8. Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In: R. Freidin / C. P. Otero / L.-M. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory (S. 133–166). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  9. Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49.
  10. Fodor, J. (1975). Language of thought. New York: Crowell.
  11. Gallego, Á. (ed.) (2012). Phases. Developing the framework. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  12. Grohmann, K. K. (ed.) (2009). Exploration of phase theory: features and arguments. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  13. Jacob, F. (1982). The possible and the actual. New York: Pantheon.
  14. Jenkins, L. (2002). Biolinguistics. Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge: University Press.
  15. Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundation of language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  16. Lorenz, K. Z. (1981). The foundations of ethology. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  17. Luria, S. (1974). Transcript of remarks at „A Debate on Bio-Linguistics,” a conference organized by the Centre Royaumont pour une science de l’homme, Paris, Endicott House, Dedham, Mass., 20.-21.05.1974.
  18. Mandelbrot, B. B. / Novak, M. M. (2004). Thinking in patterns: fractals and related phenomena in nature. London: World Scientific Publishing Co.Pte.Ltd.
  19. Mecner, P. (2017a). Zu satzfinaler Subjektposition, Unakkusativität und C-Domäne im Jiddischen. Linguistik Online, 80, 1–17, 71–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.13092/Io.80.3566 CC by 3.0.
  20. Mecner, P. (2017b). Układ strukturalny zdania w języku jidysz. In: S. Gąsiorowski / M. Ruta (eds.), Żydzi i judaizm we współczesnych badaniach polskich. Vol. VI (S. 279–295). Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.
  21. Pfeiffer, W. (1973). Elliptische Satzstrukturen im konventionellen und programmierten Fremdsprachenunterricht. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
  22. Richards, M. D. (2007). On feature inheritance: An argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 563–572.
  23. Richards, M. D. (2012). On feature inheritance, defective phases, and the movementmorphology connection. In: Á. Gallego (ed.), Phase Theory: Developing the Framework (S. 195–232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  24. Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In: L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar; handbook in generative syntax (S. 281–338). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  25. Sopata, A. (2001). Universalgrammatik und Fremdsprachendidaktik. Dissertation. Poznań: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.