On the phase model in the syntax
Journal cover Glottodidactica, volume 45, no. 2, year 2018
PDF (Deutsch)

Keywords

biolinguistics
generative grammar
syntax
phase theory
Yiddish
unaccusatives
final subject

How to Cite

Mecner, P. (2018). On the phase model in the syntax. Glottodidactica, 45(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2018.45.2.13

Abstract

The article examines some aspects of the modern syntax and algorithmic modeling. In 1974, in Dedham, Massachusetts, an international meeting took place which paved the way for the interdisciplinary research field of biolinguistics. The key focus area was syntax, its hierarchical structure and system of discrete infinity, unusual for the biological world. Here, some aspects of computational efficiency are analyzed in recent generative frameworks: operation Merge, the probe-goal system and the concept of the phase, among others. The aim of this article is to investigate an intriguing structure with final subject of unaccusatives in Yiddish, a Germanic language with Slavonic influences, and to show phase structures, feature inheritance, probe-goal, and a cyclic transfer system.

https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2018.45.2.13
PDF (Deutsch)

References

Belletti, A. (2004). Aspects of the low IP area. In: L. Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures (S. 16–51). Vol. 2. New York: Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0002

Boeckx, C. (2012). Phases beyond explanatory adequacy. In: Á. Gallego (ed.), Phase Theory: Developing the Framework (S. 45–66). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110264104.45

Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In: R. Martin / D. Michaels / J. Uriagereka (ed.), Step by step (S. 89–156). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In: M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (S. 1–52). Cambridge MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004

Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In: A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures. Vol. 3 (S. 104–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0004

Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655

Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG from below. In: U. Sauerland / H.-M. Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces+recursion=language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics (S. 1–30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207552.1

Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In: R. Freidin / C. P. Otero / L.-M. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory (S. 133–166). Cambridge MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009

Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003

Fodor, J. (1975). Language of thought. New York: Crowell.

Gallego, Á. (ed.) (2012). Phases. Developing the framework. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110264104

Grohmann, K. K. (ed.) (2009). Exploration of phase theory: features and arguments. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213966

Jacob, F. (1982). The possible and the actual. New York: Pantheon.

Jenkins, L. (2002). Biolinguistics. Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge: University Press.

Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundation of language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Lorenz, K. Z. (1981). The foundations of ethology. New York: Simon and Schuster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-3671-3

Luria, S. (1974). Transcript of remarks at „A Debate on Bio-Linguistics,” a conference organized by the Centre Royaumont pour une science de l’homme, Paris, Endicott House, Dedham, Mass., 20.-21.05.1974.

Mandelbrot, B. B. / Novak, M. M. (2004). Thinking in patterns: fractals and related phenomena in nature. London: World Scientific Publishing Co.Pte.Ltd.

Mecner, P. (2017a). Zu satzfinaler Subjektposition, Unakkusativität und C-Domäne im Jiddischen. Linguistik Online, 80, 1–17, 71–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.80.3566

Mecner, P. (2017b). Układ strukturalny zdania w języku jidysz. In: S. Gąsiorowski / M. Ruta (eds.), Żydzi i judaizm we współczesnych badaniach polskich. Vol. VI (S. 279–295). Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.

Pfeiffer, W. (1973). Elliptische Satzstrukturen im konventionellen und programmierten Fremdsprachenunterricht. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

Richards, M. D. (2007). On feature inheritance: An argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 563–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.563

Richards, M. D. (2012). On feature inheritance, defective phases, and the movementmorphology connection. In: Á. Gallego (ed.), Phase Theory: Developing the Framework (S. 195–232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110264104.195

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In: L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar; handbook in generative syntax (S. 281–338). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7

Sopata, A. (2001). Universalgrammatik und Fremdsprachendidaktik. Dissertation. Poznań: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.

Themes by Openjournaltheme.com