Developing a module structure in an online course for LSP teacher professional development
Journal cover Glottodidactica, volume 52, no. 1, year 2025
PDF (English)

Schlagworte

teacher professional development
LSP teachers
self-directed online course
open educational resource
intra-module structure
LSP-TEOC.Pro

Zitationsvorschlag

Jurkovič, V., & Podgoršek, S. (2025). Developing a module structure in an online course for LSP teacher professional development. Glottodidactica, 52(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2025.52.1.3

Abstract

Self-directed open educational resources can serve as valuable tools for the continuing professional development of LSP teachers. This paper introduces an open educational resource, the LSP-TEOC.Pro course, which has been available since 2023. The course is organised into instructional modules, each serving as a distinct learning block. However, a research gap remains in understanding how intra-module design influences user experience and learning outcomes in self-directed courses. Given that module structure is of utmost importance for efficient learning, the main objective of this paper is to provide an intra-module presentation and analysis from the user perspective with respect to the following elements: difficulty, length and pacing, objectives, development and sequencing, interior feature strands, design, and clarity. The qualitative data were derived from the diaries kept by the course users when engaging with course content, and the open-ended questions in the post-participation surveys completed by the users. The results of the qualitative data analysis concerning module structure revealed overall user satisfaction with the intra-module structure. However, the results also highlight several points for consideration when designing self-directed courses, particularly concerning module design and clarity, efficient use of digital tools, and the users’ needs for feedback and a sense of belonging to a community of practice. These results may assist LSP teacher educators in the application of the LSP-TEOC.Pro course in in-person, blended, or online educational events, as well as course designers of self-directed courses in reflecting on various aspects of structure at the level of individual instructional blocks.

https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2025.52.1.3
PDF (English)

Funding

the Erasmus+ programme of the European Union (Reference Number: 2020-1-DE01-005687). Project title: LSP-TEOC.Pro (Language for Specific Purposes Teacher Education Online Course for Professional Development)

Literaturhinweise

Basturkmen, H. (2014). LSP teacher education: Review of literature and suggestions for the research agenda. Ibérica, 28, 17–33.

Belcher, D. (2013). The future of ESP research: resources for access and choice. In: B. Paltridge / S. Starfield (eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 535–551). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch28

Bocanegra-Valle, A. / Basturkmen, H. (2019). Investigating the teacher education needs of experienced ESP teachers in Spanish universities. Ibérica, 38, 127–149.

Bocanegra-Valle, A. / Perea-Barbera, L. (2023). A quantitative analysis of LSP teacher needs across the European Higher Education Area. In: M-A. Chateaureynaud / P. John (eds.), LSP teacher training summer school. The TRAILs project (pp. 111–130). Lausanne: Peter Lang.

Borg, S. (2023). Planning teacher CPD – key principles. https://simon-borg.co.uk/planning-teacher-cpd-key-principles/

Burazer, L. / Skela, J. (2023). Foreword. In: J. Skela / L. Burazer (eds.), Teacher development resource book for pre-service ELT education programs (pp. 7–8). Ljubljana: Tangram.

Dede, C. / Jass Ketelhut, D. / Whitehouse, P. / Breit, L. / McCloskey, E.M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108327554

Guerrero-Quiñonez, A.J. / Bedoya-Flores, M.C. / Mosquera-Quiñonez, E.F. / Ango-Ramos, E.D. / Lara-Tambaco, R.M. (2023). The MOOC as an alternative model for university education. Ibero-American Journal of Education & Society Research, 3(1), 279–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoeds.v3i1.629

Hall, D.R. (2013). Teacher education for languages for specific purposes. In: C.A. Chapelle (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 5537–5542). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1144

Howard, R. (1997). LSP in the UK. In: R. Howard / G. Brown (eds.), Teacher education for languages for specific purposes (pp. 41–57). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Jurkovič, V. (2003). PBL in Slovenia – a successful conclusion of a three-year project. Journal for Foreign Languages, 37(1–2), 423–430.

Jurkovič, V. / Dostal, M. / Mertelj, D. / Podgoršek, S. (2023). Intellectual output 3: Development of course content for LSP teacher education and development. Internal report. https://lsp-teoc-pro.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Intellectual-Output-3-Final-Report.pdf

Jurkovič, V. / Mertelj, D. / Podgoršek, S. (2024). A further step toward a definition of the core professional development needs of LSP teachers in the EHEA. Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 299–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.21039.jur

Kic-Drgas, J. / Jurkovič, V. (2024). Paths of purpose: A journey into LSP teacher development. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737016902

Kırkgöz, Y. (2023). Intellectual output 6: Trialling developed LSP teacher education online course. Internal report. https://lsp-teoc-pro.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Intellectual-Output-6-Final-Report.pdf

Master, P. (1997). ESP teacher education in the USA. In: R. Howard / G. Brown (eds.), Teacher education for languages for specific purposes (pp. 22–40). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Podgoršek, S. / Jurkovič, V. / Dostal, M. / Mertelj, D. (2021). Analiza izobraževalnih potreb visokošolskih učiteljev tujih jezikov stroke v Sloveniji [An analysis of Slovenian higher education LSP teacher education and professional development needs and expectation]. Sodobna pedagogika, 72(3), 94–110.

Richards, J.C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667220

Sallam, M.H. / Martín-Monje, E. / Li, Y. (2020). Research trends in language MOOC studies: A systematic review of the published literature (2012–2018). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 764–791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744668

Sarré, C. / Skarli, P. / Turula, A. (2021). The pedagogy of languages for specific purposes: developing key professional competences through a massive open online course for language teachers. Inovacije u nastavi – časopis za savremenu nastavu, 34(4), 13–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2104013S

Schneider, D.K. (2008). Textbook writing tutorial. http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Textbook_writing_tutorial

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research. A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.

Skela, J. / Burazer, L. (2021). The architecture of ELT coursebooks: The internal organization of coursebook units. Journal for Foreign Languages, 13(1), 383–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4312/vestnik.13.383-407

Turula A. / Gajewska E. (2019). Towards a common competence framework for LSP teachers. CATAPULT consortium. http://catapult-project.eu/?smd_process_download=1&download_id=1066

Zourou, K. / Torresin, G. (2019). CATAPULT situational survey: LSP teachers’ needs for skills and training. CATAPULT consortium. https://catapult-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/O1_Full_Report_Final_CATAPULT.pdf

Themes by Openjournaltheme.com