Schlagworte
choix des mots
didactique du FLE
discours numériques
conscience langagière
métacompétence
environnement communicationnel
apprenants réflexifs.
Zitationsvorschlag
Abstract
Cet article part du postulat que les mutations discursives liées à la modernité liquide appellent au développement d’une conscience critique du choix des mots en FLE. Afin de justifier la nécessité d’une telle métacompétence il s’appuie sur un cadre théorique à visée interprétative, ancré dans les analyses sociologiques contemporaines. Une enquête qualitative menée auprès de 30 étudiants de philologie française vient en examiner la pertinence, en explorant l’impact des médias numériques sur leurs usages langagiers et leur sensibilité lexicale. Les résultats révèlent une conscience partielle des enjeux de clarté et de style, souvent intuitive, mais offrant un potentiel réflexif. Des pistes pédagogiques sont proposées pour encourager une réflexion langagière plus consciente et intégrée.
Literaturhinweise
Aboujaoude, E. (2011). Virtually you: The dangerous powers of the e-personality. New York: W.W. Norton.
Baron, N. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE.
Blachowska-Szmigiel, M. (2023). Pokolenie Z w przestrzeni edukacji formalnej: potrzeby i wyzwania. Studia Edukacyjne, 70, 167–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/se.2023.70.11
Blommaert, J. (2012). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Braun, V. / Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cardon, D. (2019). Culture numérique. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.cardo.2019.01
Carr, N. (2021). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W.W. Norton.
Citton, Y. (2014). Pour une écologie de l'attention. Paris: Seuil.
Collomb, C. / Galligo, I. / Pais, E. (2016). Les algorithmes du désir : enquête sur le design libidinal de Tinder. Sciences du Design, 4(2), 117–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/sdd.004.0117
Conseil de l’Europe (2001). Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues : apprendre, enseigner, évaluer. Strasbourg: Conseil de l’Europe.
Coupland, N. (eds.) (2010). The handbook of language and globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324068
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002
Gee, J.P. (2015). The new literacy studies and the social turn. In: J. Rowsell / K. Pahl (eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. nd.). London / New York: Routledge. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED442118.pdf
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Han, B.-C. (2011). L’agonie de l’Eros. Paris: Éditions Autrement.
Hartog, F. (2003). Régimes d'historicité. Présentisme et expériences du temps. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Hepp, A. (2013). Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heller, M. (2011). Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746866.001.0001
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU Press.
Kücklich, J. (2005). Precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry. Fibreculture Journal, 5. https://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-025-precarious-playbour-modders-andthe-digital-games-industry/
Laplane, D. (2005). Penser, c’est-à-dire ? Enquête neurophilosophique. Paris: Armand Colin.
Lipovetsky, G. (1983). L’ère du vide. Essais sur l’individualisme contemporain. Paris: Gallimard.
Marwick, A.E. / Boyd, D. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17(2), 139–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539
Melosik, Z. (2003). Tożsamość, ciało i władza – teksty kultury popularnej. Poznań: Edytor.
Melosik, Z. (2013). Kultura popularna i tożsamość młodzieży. W niewoli władzy i wolności. Kraków: Impuls.
Michelot, F. / Colin, L. (2019). Didactique du FLE à l’ère numérique. Paris: Didier.
Morbitzer, J. (2017). Współczesny uczeń jako Homo mediens – edukacyjne implikacje. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas. Pedagogika, 14, 71–81.
Panjaitan, L.L. / Patria, A.N. (2024). Social media and language evolution: The impact of digital communication on language change. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7(12), 53–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.12.8
Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Patino, B. (2019). La civilisation du poisson rouge. Petit traité sur le marché de l’attention. Paris: Grasset. https://www.scribd.com/document/413132132/La-Civilisation-Du-Poisson-Rouge-Bruno-Patino
Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death. New York: Viking.
Rosa, H. (2010). Accélération. Une critique sociale du temps. Paris: La Découverte.
Rosiński, K. (2023). Pokolenie Z wydaje pieniądze na „ostentacyjny konsumpcjonizm”. Millenialsi stawiają na doświadczenia. Money.pl. https://www.money.pl/pieniadze/pokolenie-z-wydaje-pieniadze-na-ostentacyjny-konsumpcjonizm-millenialsi-stawiaja-na-doswiadczenia-6884904657116064a.html
Sales, N.J. (2015). Tinder and the dawn of the ‘dating apocalypse’. Vanity Fair. http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/08/tinder-hook-up-culture-end-of-dating
Scholz, T.M. (2013). Digital labor: The internet as playground and factory. New York: Routledge.
Schrader, J. (2018). The science behind what Tinder is doing to your brain. https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/after-service/201805/the-science-behind-what-tinder-is-doing-toyour-brain
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
Urbaniak, M. (2014). Gorzki posmak płynnej nowoczesności. Wybrane zagadnienia z filozofii społecznej Zygmunta Baumana. Kwartalnik Naukowy Uczelni Vistula, 4(42), 5–27.
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001
Wagener, A. (2020). Mèmes, gifs et communication cognitivo-affective sur Internet. Communication (en ligne), 37(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/communication.11061
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2026 Marzena Blachowska-Szmigiel
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.
Authors
Authors of texts accepted for publication in Glottodidactica are required to complete, sign and return to the editor's office the Agreement for granting a royalty-free license to works with a commitment to grant a CC sub-license.
Under the agreement, the authors of texts published in Glottodidactica grant the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań a non-exclusive, royalty-free license and authorize the use of Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license.
The authors retain the right to continue the free disposal of the work.
Users
Interested Internet users are entitled to use works published in Glottodidactica since 2016, under the following conditions:
- attribution - obligation to provide, together with the distributed work, information about the authorship, title, source (link to the original work, DOI) and the license itself.
- no derivatives - the work must be preserved in its original form, without the author's consent it is not possible to distribute the modified work, such as translations, publications, etc.
Copyrights are reserved for all texts published before 2016.
Miscellaneous
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań retains the right to magazines as a whole (layout, graphic form, title, cover design, logo etc.).