Réflexion critique sur le choix des mots en FLE : une métacompétence essentielle face aux transformations de la modernité liquide: une metacompetence essentielle face aux transformations de la modernite liquide. Le cas du FLE

Aboujaoude, E. (2011). Virtually you: The dangerous powers of the e-personality. New York: W.W. Norton.

Baron, N. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE.

Blachowska-Szmigiel, M. (2023). Pokolenie Z w przestrzeni edukacji formalnej: potrzeby i wyzwania. Studia Edukacyjne, 70, 167–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/se.2023.70.11

Blommaert, J. (2012). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Braun, V. / Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cardon, D. (2019). Culture numérique. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.cardo.2019.01

Carr, N. (2021). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W.W. Norton.

Citton, Y. (2014). Pour une écologie de l'attention. Paris: Seuil.

Collomb, C. / Galligo, I. / Pais, E. (2016). Les algorithmes du désir : enquête sur le design libidinal de Tinder. Sciences du Design, 4(2), 117–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/sdd.004.0117

Conseil de l’Europe (2001). Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues : apprendre, enseigner, évaluer. Strasbourg: Conseil de l’Europe.

Coupland, N. (eds.) (2010). The handbook of language and globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324068

Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002

Gee, J.P. (2015). The new literacy studies and the social turn. In: J. Rowsell / K. Pahl (eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. nd.). London / New York: Routledge. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED442118.pdf

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

Han, B.-C. (2011). L’agonie de l’Eros. Paris: Éditions Autrement.

Hartog, F. (2003). Régimes d'historicité. Présentisme et expériences du temps. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Hepp, A. (2013). Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Heller, M. (2011). Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746866.001.0001

Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU Press.

Kücklich, J. (2005). Precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry. Fibreculture Journal, 5. https://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-025-precarious-playbour-modders-andthe-digital-games-industry/

Laplane, D. (2005). Penser, c’est-à-dire ? Enquête neurophilosophique. Paris: Armand Colin.

Lipovetsky, G. (1983). L’ère du vide. Essais sur l’individualisme contemporain. Paris: Gallimard.

Marwick, A.E. / Boyd, D. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17(2), 139–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539

Melosik, Z. (2003). Tożsamość, ciało i władza – teksty kultury popularnej. Poznań: Edytor.

Melosik, Z. (2013). Kultura popularna i tożsamość młodzieży. W niewoli władzy i wolności. Kraków: Impuls.

Michelot, F. / Colin, L. (2019). Didactique du FLE à l’ère numérique. Paris: Didier.

Morbitzer, J. (2017). Współczesny uczeń jako Homo mediens – edukacyjne implikacje. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas. Pedagogika, 14, 71–81.

Panjaitan, L.L. / Patria, A.N. (2024). Social media and language evolution: The impact of digital communication on language change. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7(12), 53–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.12.8

Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Patino, B. (2019). La civilisation du poisson rouge. Petit traité sur le marché de l’attention. Paris: Grasset. https://www.scribd.com/document/413132132/La-Civilisation-Du-Poisson-Rouge-Bruno-Patino

Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death. New York: Viking.

Rosa, H. (2010). Accélération. Une critique sociale du temps. Paris: La Découverte.

Rosiński, K. (2023). Pokolenie Z wydaje pieniądze na „ostentacyjny konsumpcjonizm”. Millenialsi stawiają na doświadczenia. Money.pl. https://www.money.pl/pieniadze/pokolenie-z-wydaje-pieniadze-na-ostentacyjny-konsumpcjonizm-millenialsi-stawiaja-na-doswiadczenia-6884904657116064a.html

Sales, N.J. (2015). Tinder and the dawn of the ‘dating apocalypse’. Vanity Fair. http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/08/tinder-hook-up-culture-end-of-dating

Scholz, T.M. (2013). Digital labor: The internet as playground and factory. New York: Routledge.

Schrader, J. (2018). The science behind what Tinder is doing to your brain. https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/after-service/201805/the-science-behind-what-tinder-is-doing-toyour-brain

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

Urbaniak, M. (2014). Gorzki posmak płynnej nowoczesności. Wybrane zagadnienia z filozofii społecznej Zygmunta Baumana. Kwartalnik Naukowy Uczelni Vistula, 4(42), 5–27.

van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001

Wagener, A. (2020). Mèmes, gifs et communication cognitivo-affective sur Internet. Communication (en ligne), 37(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/communication.11061