Abstract
The paper deals with the issue of language planning and policy both in the historical as well as the ecological perspective. The problem of linguistic diversity protection and maintenance in opposition to monolingual global world is explored.References
Bang, J., Door, J., 2000. Ecology, ethics and communication. In: Dialectical Linguistics 1, 53–84.
Begon, M., Collin, R., Townsend, J., Harper, L., 2006. Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Block, D., Cameron, D. (eds), 2000. Globalization and language teaching. London–New York: Routledge.
Clyne, M., 1994. Intercultural communication at work. Cultural values in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D., 2000. Language death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darquennes, J., Nedle, P., 2011. Multilingualism and language planning. . 20.01.2011.
Fairclough, N., 2006. Language and globalization. London–New York: Routledge.
Fasold, R., 1990. Sociolinguistics of language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fill, A., 2001. Ecolinguistics: state of art. In: Fill, A., P. Müllhausler (eds.). Ecolinguistic studies. New York: Continuum, 43–53.
Fishman, J., 1968a. Sociolinguistics and the language problems of the developing countries. In: Fishman, A., Ferguson, Ch., Das Gupta, J. (eds). Language Problems of the Developing Nations. New York: Wiley and Sons, 3–16.
Fishman, J., 1968b. Some contrasts between linguistically homogeneous and linguistically heterogeneous polities. In: Fishman, A., Ferguson, Ch., Das Gupta, J. (eds). Language Problems of Developing Nations. New York: Wiley and Sons, 53–68.
Jernudd, J., Das Gupta, J., Rubin, J., 1971. Towards a theory of language planning. In: Can language be planned? Sociolinguistic theory and practice for developing nations. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii, 195–215.
Jung, M., 2001. Ecological criticism of language. In: The Ecolinguistic Reader. Language, Ecology and Environment 68. 1, 4–10.
Kaplan, B., Baldauf, R. (senior), Baldauf, R. (junior), 1997. Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters ltd.
Kloss, H., 1968. Notes Concerning a Language. Nation Typology. In: Fishman J.A. (ed.). Language Problems of Developing Nations. New York–London: John Wiley and Sons.
Lambert, D., Shohamy, E., 2000. Language policy and pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McArthur, T. (ed.), 1992. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mufwene, S., 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mufwene, S., 2008. Language evolution: contact, competition and change. London: Continuum.
Mühlhäusler, P., 1991. Linguistic ecology, language change and linguistic imperialism in the Pacific Rim. London: Routledge.
Mühlhäusler, P., 2003. Language of environment – environment of language. A course in ecolinguistics. London: Battlebridge Publications.
Mühlhausler, P., 2005. Language planning and language ecology. In: Current Issues in language Planning 1, No. 3, 303–326.
Odum, E.P., 2004. Fundamentals of ecology. New York: Thompson Brooks–Cole Date.
Patten, A., 2001. Political theory and language policy. In: Political Theory 29, 691–715.
Pennycook, A., 1994. The cultural politics of English as an international language. London: Longman.
Pennycook, A., 2007. Global englishes and transcultural flow. London–New York: Routledge.
Phillipson, R., 1992. Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Phillipson, R., Skuttnabb-Kangas, T., 1996a. English Only Worldwide or Language Ecology. In: TESOL QUARTERLY 30, 429–450.
Phillipson, R., Skuttnabb-Kangas, T., 1996b. Historical and theoretical perspectives in language planning. In: Journal of Sociolinguistics 4/2, 436–447.
Puppel, S., 2004. An outline of a domain – resource – agent – access – management (DRAAM) model of human communication. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University, Department of Ecocommunication. Electronic journal Oikeios Logos 1.
Puppel, S., 2007a. Interlingwalizm czy translingwalizm? Interkomunikacja czy transkomunikacja? Uwagi w kontekście współistnienia języków naturalnych w ramach globalnej wspólnoty kulturowo – językowo – komunikacyjnej In: Społeczeństwo – Kultura – Język. Scripta de Communicatione Posnaniensi I, 79–94.
Puppel, S. (ed.), 2007b. Ochrona języków naturalnych. In: Scripta de Communicatione Posnaniensi I.
Puppel, S., 2008. Remarks on the sustainability of natural languages. In: Puppel, S., Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (eds). New Pathways in Linguistics, 275–285.
Puppel, S., 2009a. The protection of language diversity – fancy or duty? In: Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia X, 97–109.
Puppel, S., 2009b. Remarks on the sustainability of natural languages In: Puppel, S., Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (eds.). New pathways in linguistics, 275–285.
Puppel, S., Puppel, J., 2005. Zagadnienie percepcji języka naturalnego w triadzie: język – ojczysty – język globalny – język sąsiedni na przykładzie triady: język polski – język angielski – język niemiecki w ujęciu ekolingwistycznym: próba typologii. In: Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia VII, 55–95.
Ricento, T., 2000. Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. In: Journal of Sociolinguistics 4/2, 196-213.
Ricento, T., 2006. Language policy. Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Ricento, T., Hornberger, N., 1996. Unpeeling the onion: language planning and policy and ELT professional. In: TESOL QUARTERLY 30.3, 401- 427.
Rubin, J., Fishman, J., Jernudd, B., Das Gupta, J., Ferguson C. (eds), 1977. Language Planning Process. The Hague: Mouton.
Rubin, J., Jernudd, B., 1971. A view towards the future. In: Can language be planned? Sociolinguistic theory and practice for developing nations. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii, 307–310.
Ruiz R., 1984. Orientations in language planning. In: National Association for Bilingual Education 8 (2), 15–34.
Said, E., 1993. Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T., 1966. English only worldwide or language ecology. In: TESOL Quarterly 30 (3), 429–452.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T., 2000. Linguistic genocide in education – or worldwide diversity and human rights? Hillsdale, N.Y.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Spolsky, B., 2004. Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsuda, Y., 1994. The dominance of English and linguistic discrimination. In: Media Development, 34 (1), 32–34.
Weinreich, U., 1974. Languages in contact. Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.
Wiertlewska, J., 2010. W stronę nowego paradygmatu nauczania języków obcych w triadzie: język ojczysty – język globalny – drugi język obcy – podejście ekolingwistyczne. UAM Poznań. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
License
Authors
Authors of texts accepted for publication in Glottodidactica are required to complete, sign and return to the Editorial team’s office the Agreement for granting a royalty-free license to works with a commitment to grant a CC sub-license.
Under the agreement, the authors of the texts published in Glottodidactica grant Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań a non-exclusive, royalty-free license and authorize the use of Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license.
The authors retain the right to the free disposal of the work.
Users
Interested Internet users are entitled to use works that have been published in Glottodidactica since 2016, under the following conditions:
▪ attribution – obligation to provide, together with the distributed work, information about the authorship, title, source (link to the original work, DOI) and the license itself.
▪ no derivatives – the work must be preserved in its original form. Without the author's consent, it is not possible to distribute the modified work in the form of translations, publications, etc.
Copyrights are reserved for all texts published before 2016.
Miscellaneous
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań retains the property right as a whole (layout, graphic form, title, cover design, logo etc.).
Privacy statement
The names and email addresses published on this journal site will be used exclusively for the purposes declared by this journal and cannot be used for any other purpose or by any other party.