The results of a pilot study on immersive Virtual Reality to boost learner-to-learner mediation strategies in Italian as a foreign language
PDF (English)

Mots-clés

immersive virtual reality
digital multimodal composing
mediation strategies
language pedagogy
teaching foreign languages in Italy

Comment citer

Compagnoni, I. (2024). The results of a pilot study on immersive Virtual Reality to boost learner-to-learner mediation strategies in Italian as a foreign language. Glottodidactica, 51(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2024.51.2.9

Résumé

The development of immersive technologies in language education has led to pedagogical experimentations on enhancing students’ collaborative skills through task-based immersive Virtual Reality (iVR), a technology that allows users to experience real-like interactions with objects and other individuals. Despite positive correlations between the use of iVR in language learning and task accomplishment (Chen et al. 2022; Wu & Hung 2022; Romano et al. 2023), evidence is missing on the development of mediation strategies in a foreign language (FL), regarding learner-tolearner mediation strategies. Therefore, this study presents the results of a pilot study conducted at the University of Siena (Italy) on a pair of students of Italian as FL. The students were involved in digital multimodal composing (DMC) activities on the iVR platform Immerse. Results showed that mediation strategies surfaced through verbal and non-verbal facilitations of peer interactions, meaning-making, conceptual talk encouragement, and interaction management. It also highlighted methodological considerations on using iVR to involve language students in training scenarios for the development of mediation skills transferrable to real-life socio-pragmatic contexts.

https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2024.51.2.9
PDF (English)

Références

Ajabshir, Z.F. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.015

Bonner, E. / Lege, R. / Frazier, E. (2023). Teaching CLIL courses entirely in virtual reality: Educator experiences. CALICO Journal, 40(1), 45–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.22676

Brooke, J. (1995). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In: P.W. Jordan / B. Thomas / I.L. Mc-Clelland / B. Weerdmeester (eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 107–114). London: CRC Press.

Chen, B. / Wang, Y. / Wang, L. (2022). The effects of virtual reality-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 14(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063147

Council of Europe (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4

Cunningham, D.J. (2019). L2 pragmatic learning in computer-mediated communication. In: N. Taguchi (ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 372–386). Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-24

Dai, D.W. (2023). What do second language speakers really need for real-world interaction? A needs analysis of L2 Chinese interactional competence. Language Teaching Research, 0(0), 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221144836

Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. In: J. Voogt / G. Knezek (eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 43–62). Boston, MA: Springer US. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_3

Di Natale, A.F. / Repetto, C. / Riva, G. / Villani, D. (2020). Immersive virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: A 10-year systematic review of empirical research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2006–2033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13030

Dooly, M. / Thrasher, T. / Sadler, R. (2023). “Whoa! Incredible!:” Language learning experiences in virtual reality. RELC Journal, 54(2), 321–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231167610

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fazzi, F. (2021). izi.Travel: una piattaforma digitale per promuovere l’apprendimento linguisticodentro e fuori la classe. Bollettino Itals, 19, 104–113. https://iris.unive.it/handle/10278/3740018

Hampel, R. (2010). Task design for a virtual learning environment in a distance language course. In: M. Thomas / H. Reinders (eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 63–81). London, UK: Continuum Publishing Group.

Han, E. / Miller, M.R. / DeVeaux, C. / Jun, H. / Nowak, K.L. / Hancock, J.T. / Ram, N. / Bailenson, J.N. (2023). People, places, and time: a large-scale, longitudinal study of transformed avatars and environmental context in group interaction in the metaverse. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 28(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac031

Herget, K. (2020). Project-based learning in the languages for specific purposes classroom. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 20(15), 163–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v20i15.3945

Huang, H.-M. / Liaw, S.S. (2018). An analysis of learners’ intentions toward virtual reality learning based on constructivist and technology acceptance approaches. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 91–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2503

Jiang, L. (2017). The affordances of digital multimodal composing for EFL learning. ELT Journal, 71(4), 413–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw098

Johnson, D.W. / Johnson, R. T. (2013). Restorative approaches in schools: Necessary roles of cooperative learning and constructive conflict. In: E. Sellman / H. Cremin / G. McCluskey (eds.), Restorative approaches to conflict in schools: Interdisciplinary perspectives on whole school approaches to managing relationships (pp. 159–174). Abingdon: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Kennedy, R.S. / Lane, N.E. / Berbaum, K.S. / Lilienthal, M.G. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3), 203–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3

Krueger, R. / Casey, M. (2015). Focus group interviewing. In: K.E. Newcomer / H.P. Hatry / J.S. Wholey (eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 506–534). London: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch20

Kukulska-Hulme, A. / Lee, H. / Norris, L. (2017). Mobile learning revolution, implications for language pedagogy. In: C.A. Chappelle / S. Sauro (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 217–233). John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069.ch15

Liang, W.J. / Lim, F.V. (2021). A pedagogical framework for digital multimodal composing in the English language classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(4), 306–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1800709

Liu, C.C. / Yang, C.Y. / Chao, P.Y. (2019). A longitudinal analysis of student participation in a digital collaborative storytelling activity. Education Technology Research Development, 67, 907–929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09666-3

Loh, R. / Ang, C. (2020). Unravelling cooperative learning in higher education: a review of research. Research in Social Science and Technology, 5(2), 22–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.05.02.2

Madathil, K.C. / Frady, K. / Hartley, R. / Bertrand, J. / Alfred, M. / Gramopadhye, A. (2017). An empirical study investigating the effectiveness of integrating virtual reality-based case studies into an online asynchronous learning environment. Computers in Education Journal, 8(3), 1–10. https://coed.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/7-An-Empirical-Study-Investigatingthe-Effectiveness-of-Integrating-Virtual-Reality-based-Case-Studies-into-an-Online-Asynchronous-Learning-Environment.pdf

Marougkas, A. / Troussas, C. / Krouska, A. / Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual reality in Education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics, 12(13). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832

Moore, Ch.W. (2014). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. New York et al.: John Wiley & Sons.

Nicoli, N. / Henriksen, K. / Komodromos, M. / Tsagalas, D. (2022). Investigating digital storytelling for the creation of positively engaging digital content. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(2), 157–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-03-2021-0036

Oigara, J.N. (2018). Integrating virtual reality tools into classroom instruction. In: Information Resources Management Association (ed.), Handbook of research on mobile technology, constructivism, and meaningful learning (pp. 369–381). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3949-0.ch008

Piaget, J. (2001). The language and thought of the child. New York et al.: Routledge.

Rattanasak, S. (2023). The interplay between the Internet-based reading resources and learner-to-learner interactions in blended language learning. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(2), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13050

Romano, M. / Frolli, A. / Aloisio, A. / Russello, C. / Rega, A. / Cerciello, F. / Bisogni, F. (2023).Exploring the potential of immersive virtual reality in Italian schools: A practical workshop with high school teachers. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(12), 1–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7120111

Rusbult, C.E. / Lange van, P.A.M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145059

Shen, X. / Hao, C. / Peng, J.E. (2022). Promoting EFL learners’ willingness to communicate through transmediation in a digital storytelling workshop. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2086257

Siegel, M. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformation in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–77. https://www.academia.edu/93625493/Rereading_the_signs_Multimodal_transformations_in_the_field_of_literacy_education DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/la20065611

Spaliviero, C. (2022). Teaching Italian as a second language through digital storytelling: Students’ perceptions towards izi.TRAVEL. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 9, 91–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21283/2376905X.15.1.265

Thrasher, T. (2022). The impact of virtual reality on L2 French learners’ language anxiety and oral comprehensibility: An exploratory study. CALICO Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.42198

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wenk, N. / Penalver-Andres, J. / Buetler, K.A. / Nef, T. / Müri, R.M. / Marchal-Crespo, L. (2021).Effect of immersive visualization technologies on cognitive load, motivation, usability, and embodiment. Virtual Reality, 27, 307–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00565-8

Witmer, B.G. / Singer, M.J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686

Wu, B. / Yu, X. / Gu, X. (2020). Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head-mounted displays on learning performance: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1991–2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13023

Wu, Y.H. / Hung, S.T. (2022). The effects of virtual reality infused instruction on elementary school students’ English-speaking performance, willingness to communicate, and learning autonomy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(6), 1558–1587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211068207