Słowa kluczowe
modular approaches
modular versus connectionist models of language processing
language perception
language production
syntactic processes in speech production
generative grammar
neuroimaging
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
The scope of this paper is the concept of modularity of language, which is a key to understanding the complexity of human cognitive system. The author of the paper presents various arguments in favor of the thesis that both moderate and extreme modularity-related theories allow, too much greater extent than non-modularity theories, for reconstruction and description of complex structures of the language perception and production.
Bibliografia
Aitchinson, J., 1997. Wörter im Kopf. Eine Einführung in das mentale Lexikon. Tübingen:Niemeyer.
Altman, G.T.M. (ed.), 1990. Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Altmann, G.T.M., Steedman, M., 1988. Interaction with Context during Human Sentence Processing. Cognition 30, 191-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0
Altmann, G.T.M., Kamide, J., 2004. Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Mediating the Mapping Between Language and the Visual World. In: Hendeson, J. M., Ferreira, F. (eds). The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World. New York: Psychology Press, 347-386.
Anstatt, T. (ed.), 2007. Mehrsprachigkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Erwerb. Formen. Förderung.Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
Binder, J., Frost, J.A. et al., 2000. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cerebral Cortex 10 (5), 512-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.5.512
Butterworth, B. (ed.), 1980. Language Production. Vol. 1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press.
Carruthers, P., 2006. The Architecture of the Mind: massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207077.003.0004
Cavedini, P., Gorini, A., Bellodi, L., 2006. Understanding obsessive-compulsive disorder: focus on decision making. Neuropsychology Review 16 (1), 3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-006-9001-y
Chomsky, N., 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
Chomsky, N., 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures, Dordrecht:Foris.
Chomsky, N., 1984. Modular Approaches to the Study of the Mind. San Diego: University of California.
Chomsky, N., 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N., 1995. The Minimalist Program. MA/London–Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N., 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811937
Crocker, W., Pickering, M.W., Charles Clifton, Ch., 2000. Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527210
Dell, G., O’Seaghdha, P., 1991. Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. 1991. Psychological Review 98, 604-614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.98.4.604
Ellis, A., Young, A., 1988. Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove, UK: Lawrence.
Fodor, J., 1983. The Modularity of Mind. An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge Mass:MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001
Fodor, J., 1985. Précis of The Modularity of Mind. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, 1-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00019476
Fodor, J., 1998. Concepts. Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198236360.001.0001
Fodor, J., 2000. The Mind Doesn't Work That Way. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4627.001.0001
Fodor, J., 2001. Language, Thought and Compositionality. Mind and Language 16, 1, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00153
Fodor, J., Bever, Th. G., Garrett, M.F., 1974. The Psychology of Language. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Frazier, L., 1987. Theories of Sentence Processing. In: J. Garfield (ed.). Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 291-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4735.003.0023
Frazier, L., 1990. Exploring the Architecture of the Language-Processing System. In: G.T.M. Altman, (ed.). Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 409-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1889.003.0020
Frazier, L., Clifton, C., 1989. Successive Cyclicity in the Grammar and the Parser. Language and Cognitive Processes 4 (2), 93-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968908406359
Frazier, L., Clifton, C., 1996. Construal. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
Frazier, L., Flores D’Arcais, G.B., 1989. Filler Driven Parsing: a Study of Gap Filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 331-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90037-5
Frazier, L., Villiers, J. (eds), 1990. Language Processing and Language Acquisition. Dordrecht:Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3808-6
Friederici, A.D., 1995. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language 50, 259-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1048
Friederici, A., 2003. Neurobiologische Grundlagen der Sprache. In: H.-O. Karnath, Thier, P. (eds). Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer, 215-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08957-6_32
Friederici, A.D., 2003. Sprachverarbeitung – Der Lauscher im Kopf. Geist und Hirn 2, 43-45.
Friederici, A.D., 2004. Wie der Mensch Sprache versteht. Einblicke ins Gehirn. Bertha Benz-Vorlesung 22. Landenburg: Gottlieb Daimler und Karl Benz Stiftung.
Friederici, A.D., 2005. Neuropsychological markers of early language acquisition: from syllables to sentences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 481-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.008
Friederici, A.D., 2006. Neurobiologische Grundlagen der Sprache. In: H.-O. Karnath,Thier, P. (eds), Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer. 2. Aufl., 346-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28449-4_33
Friederici, A.D. (ed.), 1999. Sprachrezeption. Band 2. Göttingen–Bern–Toronto–Seattle:Hogrefe.
Friederici, A.D., Alter, K., 2004a. Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway view. Brain and Language 89, 267-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00351-1
Friederici, A.D., von Cramon, D.Y., 1999. Neurobiologische Grundlagen des Sprachverstehens.In: A.D. Friederici (ed.). Sprachrezeption. Band 2. Göttingen–Bern–Toronto–Seattle: Hogrefe, 307-349.
Friederici, A.D., Kotz, S.A., 2003a. The brain basis of syntactic processes: Functional imaging and lesion studies. NeuroImage, Special Issue 20, 8-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.003
Friederici, A.D., Fiebach, C.J., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I., von Cramon, D.Y., 2006.Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 16, 1709-1717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj106
Friederici, A.D., Gunter, T.C., Hahne, A., Mauth, K., 2004. The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. NeuroReport 15, 165-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200401190-00032
Friederici, A.D., Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Hahne, A., Friebach, C.J., 2003b. The role of the left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex 13, 170-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.2.170
Friederici, A.D., von Cramon, D.Y., Kotz, S.A., 2007. Role of the corpus callosum in speech comprehension: Interfacing syntax and prosody. Neuron 53 (1), 135-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.020
Friederici, A.D., Meyer, M., von Cramon, D.Y., 2000. Auditory language comprehension: An event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain and Language 74, 289-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2313
Garfield, J. (ed.), 1987. Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4735.001.0001
Garrett, M.F., 1980. Levels of Processing in Sentence Production. In: Butterworth, B. (ed.). Language Production. Vol. 1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press, 66-97.
Garrett, M.F., 1988. Processes in Language Production. In: Newmeyer, F.J. (ed.). Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Press, 69-96.
Hagoort, P., 2003. How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. NeuroImage 20 (Suppl. 1), 18-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.013
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., Petersson, K.M., 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304, 438-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095455
Hartje, W., 2002. Funktionelle Asymmetrie der Großhirnhemisphären. In: Hartje, W., Poeck, K. (eds). Klinische Neuropsychologie. New York–Stuttgart: Thieme, 67-92.
Hartje, W.K., Poeck, K. (eds), 2002. Klinische Neuropsychologie. New York–Stuttgart: Thieme.Henderson J. M., Ferreira F. (eds), 2004. The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World. New York: Psychology Press.
Herrmann, Th., 1985. Allgemeine Sprachpsychologie. München: Urban & Scharzenberg.
Herrmann, Th., Grabowski, J., 1994. Sprechen: Psychologie der Sprachproduktion. Heidelberg:Spektrum.
Hickock, G., Poeppel, D., 2000. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (4), 131-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01463-7
Indefrey, P., Levelt, W.J.M., 2004. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92, 101-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
Jackendoff, R., 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford:Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
Jackendoff, R., Pinker, S., 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for the evolution of language. Cognition 97, 211-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006
Karnath, H.-O., Thier P. (ed.), 2006. Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28449-4
Kotz, S.A., Frisch, S., von Cramon, D.Y., Friederici, A.D., 2003. Syntactic language processing: ERP lesion data on the role of the basal ganglia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 9, 1053-1060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617703970093
Levelt, W.J.M., 1989. Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001
Levelt, W.J.M. (ed.), 1992. Accessing words in speech production: stages, processes and representations. Cognition 42, 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-J
Levelt, W.J.M. (ed.), 1993. Lexical Access in Speech Production. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1840-8_11
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2014 Barbara Sadownik
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Autorzy
Autorzy tekstów przyjętych do publikacji w czasopiśmie Glottodidactica są zobowiązani do wypełnienia, podpisania i odesłania na adres redakcji umowy o udzielenie nieodpłatnej licencji do utworów, z zobowiązaniem do udzielania sublicencji CC.
Zgodnie z umową, autorzy tekstów opublikowanych w czasopiśmie Glottodidactica udzielają Uniwersytetowi im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu niewyłącznej i nieodpłatnej licencji oraz zezwalą na użycie sublicencji Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Autorzy zachowują prawa do dalszego, swobodnego rozporządzania utworem.
Użytkownicy
Zainteresowani użytkownicy internetu uprawnieni są do korzystania z utworów opublikowanych od 2015 roku w Glottodidactica pod następującymi warunkami:
- uznanie autorstwa - obowiązek podania wraz z rozpowszechnionym utworem, informacji, o autorstwie, tytule, źródle (odnośniki do oryginalnego utworu, DOI) oraz samej licencji;
- bez tworzenia utworów zależnych - utwór musi być zachowany w oryginalnej postaci, nie można bez zgody twórcy rozpowszechniać np. tłumaczeń, opracowań.
Do wszystkich tekstów opublikowanych przed 2015 r. prawa autorskie są zastrzeżone.
Inne
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu zachowuje prawo do czasopisma jako całości (układ, forma graficzna, tytuł, projekt okładki, logo itp.).