Abstract
This paper deals with the literary works of A.G. Matoš. It attempts to demonstrate that in his works a whole period of the Croatian literature modernism is concentrated. It also explores a question: Why cannot the opus of this Croatian author be absorbed into the Hungarian literature? In the Hungarian literature of modernism Matoš would be disseminated first of all because of his strong literary authority and his very special language use. Despite difficulties, the author of this paper finds some parallels between Matoš and the Hungarian authors of modernism. As a coherent and strong author of extraordinary fantasy, languge usage and style, Matoš can be only partly assimilated into the Hungarian literature.References
Altieri Ch., 2001, Az irodalmi kánon eszméje és eszménye, u: Irodalmi kánon és kanonizáció, ur. Z. Rohonyi, Budapest, str. 141–162.
Benjamin W., 1980, A műfordító feladata, u: W. Benjamin, Angelus novus, prev. D. Tandori, Budapest, str. 71–86.
Bloom H., 1996, The Western Canon. The Books and School of the Ages, London.
Borges J.L., 1992, A könyv, u: J.L. Borges, A halhatatlanság, prev. É. Tóth, Budapest, str. 9–23.
Csáth G.,1987, A varázsló halála, Budapest, str. 223–227.
Csuka Z. et al. (prir.), 1969, A szerbhorvát irodalom kistükre, Budapest.
Deleuze G., Guattari F., 1996, Rizóma, „Ex-Symposion” br. 15–16, str. 1–17.
Derrida J., 1994, Bábel Tornyai, prev. F. Endre, „Pompeji” br. 4, str. 98–133.
Donat B., 1978, Matoš – pisac s pogledom na Europu, „Republika” br. 6, str. 623–643.
Eco U., 1998, A tökéletes nyelv keresése, prev. J. Gál, J. Kelemen, Budapest.
Fejtő F., 1935, Zágrábi utinapló, „Nyugat” br. 11, str. 351–361.
Kázmér E., 1932, A horvát irodalom múltja, jelene és jövője, „Nyugat” br. 13–14. str. 79–84.
Kemény G., 2008, A Nyugat jelentősége a modern magyar szépirodalmi stílus kiteljesedésében, „Magyar Nyelvőr” br. 3, str. 279–302.
Kermode F., 2001, Kánonok és elméletek, u: Irodalmi kánon és kanonizáció, ur. Z. Rohonyi, Budapest, str. 109–140.
Király I., Szerdahelyi I. (ur.), 1984–1995, Világirodalni lexikon, sv. 1–17, Budapest.
Kolbas E.D., 2001, Critical Theory and the Literary Canon, Colorado–Oxford.
Kravar Z., 2001, Suvremene teme i konzervativni nazori u lirici A.G. Matoša, u: Književni protusvjetovi. Poglavlja iz hrvatske moderne, ur. N. Batušić, Z. Kravar, V. Žmegač, Zagreb, str. 89–96.
Lőkös I., 1996, A horvát irodalom története, Budapest.
Lőkös I. (prir.), 2004, Horvát irodalmi antológia, Budapest.
Lukács I., 2004, Antun Gustav Matoš „hungaricái”. A nyers elutasítástól egy józanabb megítélésig, u: idem, Térközök, Budapest, str. 127–139.
Mandić-Beier A., 2000, Prijevodi i recepcija Antuna Gustava Matoša u Njemačkoj (1873–1914), u: Komparativna povijest hrvatske književnosti. Zbornik radova XIII. Moderna, ur. M. Tomasović, V. Glunčić-Bužančić, Split, str. 31–51.
Matoš A.G., 1913, Apologija futurizma, „Obzor” br. 285, str. 1–2.
Medve Z., 2011, Janko Polić Kamov, Géza Csáth i Sándor Bródy: dekadencija, demitologizacija i deziluzionizam, u: Poetika i politika kulture nakon 1910. godine. Komparativna povijest hrvatske književnosti. Zbornik radova XIII, ur. C. Pavlović,
V. Glunčić-Bužančić, A. Meyer-Fraatz, Split, str. 126–134.
Oraić Tolić D., 1978, Evropsko i nacionalno u djelu A.G. Matoša, u: Hrvatska književnost u evropskom kontekstu, ur. A. Flaker, K. Pranjić, Zagreb, str. 435–447.
Oraić Tolić D., 2013, Čitanja Matoša, Zagreb.
Pranjić K., 1985, Jezik i književno djelo. Ogledi za lingvostilističku analizu književnih tekstova, Beograd.
Pranjić K., 1986, Matošiana, u: idem, Jezikom i stilom kroza književnosti, Zagreb, str. 55–105.
Sabato E., 1993, Čovjek i svemir, „Cicero” br. 3, str. 46–47.
Schopenhauer A., 1925, Nyelvről és szókról, u: idem, Parega és paralipomena. IV, prev. I. Varró, Budapest, str. 320–335.
Szerb A., 1991, Magyar irodalomtörténet, Budapest.
Šicel M., 1975, Kritika u doba hrvatske moderne, u: Hrvatska moderna. Kritika i književna povijest, ur. K. Špoljar, Zagreb, str. 7–26.
Šicel M., 2005, Moderna, sv. 3, Povijest hrvatske književnosti, Zagreb.
Ujević T., 1963, Studija o Matošu, „Mogućnosti” br. 3, str. 259–268.
Vujicsics S.D. (prir.), 1963, Jugoszláv költők antológiája, Budapest.
Žmegač V., 2001a, Osnove moderne, u: Književni protusvjetovi. Poglavlja iz hrvatske moderne, ur. N. Batušić, Z. Kravar, V. Žmegač, Zagreb, str. 11–24.
Žmegač V., 2001b, Suvremena zbilja kao književni problem, u: Književni protusvjetovi. Poglavlja iz hrvatske moderne, ur. N. Batušić, Z. Kravar, V. Žmegač, Zagreb, str. 27–36.
License
Authors
The authors of the articles accepted for publication in the journal Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne are obliged to fill up the contract for providing the journal free licence (along with sub-licence CC) to works. The contract should be also signed by the authors and sent back to the editorial board of the journal.
Under the terms of the contract, the authors of the texts published in the journal “Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne” provide the University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań with a non-exclusive free licence and allow the aforementioned institution to use the sub-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
The authors hold the copyright for their texts.
Users
The Internet users are eligible for using the works published in “Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne” from 2015 under the following conditions:
- recognition of the authorship: the popularized work must contain information about the author, title, source (references to the original work, DOI) and licence.
- no derivative works may be created: the work must be preserved in its original form, the work’s translations or elaborations cannot be distributed without the author’s permission.
The copyright to the texts published before 2015 is reserved.
Other
The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań holds the right for the entire journal (its segmentation, graphical form, title, cover design, logo, etc.).