Abstrakt
This article undertakes the issue of defining film phenomena which put forward questions of a primary religious nature (about the meaning of life, source of evil, life after death, the existence of Absolute, etc.) in a way that is independent from major religious traditions. The author posits that describing this phenomenon in the case of European film culture is done best by employing the philosophical thought of postsecularism. Utilizing Mieke Bal’s method of cultural analysis, the author takes as an example the term “sacrifice” to point to the existence of different models by which religious topics are undertaken by the cinema. This leads to a preliminary typology of the phenomenon which differentiates between ‘apologetic’ and ‘critical’ films and, furthermore, between films that refer to particular religious traditions and those expressing a postsecular perspective.
Bibliografia
Bal M. Wędrujące pojęcia w naukach humanistycznych, przeł. M. Bucholc, Warszawa 2012
Barthes R., Śmierć autora, przeł. M. P. Markowski, „Teksty Drugie” 1999, nr 1/2, s. 250
Biblia Tysiąclecia, <https://biblia.deon.pl/rozdzial.php?id=324>, [dostęp: 2.04.2021]
Britannica Encyclopedia of World Religions, red. W. Doniger, M. Frassetto, Chicago 2006
Caruana J., Cauchi M., What is postsecular cinema? An introduction, [w:] Immanent Frames: Postsecular Cinema between Malick and von Trier, red. J. Caruana, M. Cauchi, New York 2018, epub
Cooper S., The Soul of Film Theory, New York 2013
Deacy C., Ortiz G.W., Theology and Film: Challenging the Sacred/Secular Divide, Malden 2008, epub.
Donnelly S., Inglis T., The media and the Catholic Church in Ireland: reporting clerical child sex abuse, „Journal of Contemporary Religion” 2010, nr 1 (nr 25), s. 1–19
Immanent Frames: Postsecular Cinema between Malick and von Trier, red. J. Caruana, M. Cauchi, New York 2018
Kendall T., No God but cinema: Bruno Dumont’s Hadewijch, „Contemporary French and Francophone Studies” 2013, nr 4 (nr 17), s. 405–413
Kyrlezhev A., The postsecular age: Religion and culture today, „Religion, State and Society” 2008, nr 1 (nr 36), s. 21–31
Lyotard J-F., Nota o sensach przedrostka post-, [w:] J-F. Lyotard, Postmodernizm dla dzieci. Korespondencja 1982–1985, przeł. J. Migasiński, Warszawa 1998, s. 101–109.
Marczak M., Poetyka filmu religijnego, Kraków 2000
McLeod H., The Religious Crisis of the 1960s, New York 2007
Otto R., Świętość, przeł. B. Kupis, Warszawa 1999
Oxford Dictionary of Film Studies, red. A. Kuhn, G. Westwell, Oxford 2012
Post-secular Philosophy. Between Philosophy and Theology, red. Phillip Blond, New York 1998
Religion in Contemporary European Cinema: the Postsecular Constellation, red. C. Bradatan, C. Ungureanu, London 2014
Roberts M.V., Hadewijch (mid 13th century) [w:] The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization, red. G.T. Kurian, Malden 2011
Secularisms in a Postsecular Age? Religiosities and Subjectivities in Comparative Perspective, red. J. Mapril, R. Blanes, E. Giumbelli, Cham 2017
Socha P.M., Przemiana. W stronę teorii duchowości, Kraków 2014
The Concise Dictionary of World Religions, red. J. Bowker, New York 2000
The Post-Secular in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society, red. P.S. Gorski, D. Kyuman Kim, J. Torpey, New York 2012
The Routledge Handbook of Postsecularity, red. J. Beaumont, New York – London 2018
Ungureanu C., Final remarks what is the use of postsecularism? [w:] Religion in Contemporary European Cinema: the Postsecular Constellation, red. C. Bradatan, C. Ungureanu, London 2014, s. 199–219
Walton S, Film and/as devotion: Bruno Dumont’s Enworlded Cinema, „Australian Journal of French Studies” 2015, nr 2 (nr 52), s. 188–203
Weibler P., The re-enchantment of the world and the end of modern art, [w:] The New Visibility of Religion: Studies in Religion and Cultural Hermeneutics, red. M. Hoelzl, G. Ward, New York 2008, s. 117–127
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2021 Anna Maria Piskorska
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.