Die Modularität als Schlüssel zum Verständnis des Sprachverarbeitungssystems – kognitive Modelle und ihre neuronale Basis

Main Article Content

Barbara Sadownik


The scope of this paper is the concept of modularity of language, which is a key to understanding the complexity of human cognitive system. The author of the paper presents various arguments in favor of the thesis that both moderate and extreme modularity-related theories allow, too much greater extent than non-modularity theories, for reconstruction and description of complex structures of the language perception and production.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Sadownik, B. (2014). Die Modularität als Schlüssel zum Verständnis des Sprachverarbeitungssystems – kognitive Modelle und ihre neuronale Basis. Glottodidactica. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.14746/2014.41.1.4


  1. Aitchinson, J., 1997. Wörter im Kopf. Eine Einführung in das mentale Lexikon. Tübingen:Niemeyer.
  2. Altman, G.T.M. (ed.), 1990. Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Altmann, G.T.M., Steedman, M., 1988. Interaction with Context during Human Sentence Processing. Cognition 30, 191-238.
  4. Altmann, G.T.M., Kamide, J., 2004. Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Mediating the Mapping Between Language and the Visual World. In: Hendeson, J. M., Ferreira, F. (eds). The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World. New York: Psychology Press, 347-386.
  5. Anstatt, T. (ed.), 2007. Mehrsprachigkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Erwerb. Formen. Förderung.Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
  6. Binder, J., Frost, J.A. et al., 2000. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cerebral Cortex 10 (5), 512-28.
  7. Butterworth, B. (ed.), 1980. Language Production. Vol. 1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press.
  8. Carruthers, P., 2006. The Architecture of the Mind: massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Cavedini, P., Gorini, A., Bellodi, L., 2006. Understanding obsessive-compulsive disorder: focus on decision making. Neuropsychology Review 16 (1), 3-15.
  10. Chomsky, N., 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
  11. Chomsky, N., 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures, Dordrecht:Foris.
  12. Chomsky, N., 1984. Modular Approaches to the Study of the Mind. San Diego: University of California.
  13. Chomsky, N., 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  14. Chomsky, N., 1995. The Minimalist Program. MA/London–Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
  15. Chomsky, N., 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Crocker, W., Pickering, M.W., Charles Clifton, Ch., 2000. Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Dell, G., O’Seaghdha, P., 1991. Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. 1991. Psychological Review 98, 604-614.
  18. Ellis, A., Young, A., 1988. Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove, UK: Lawrence.
  19. Fodor, J., 1983. The Modularity of Mind. An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge Mass:MIT Press.
  20. Fodor, J., 1985. Précis of The Modularity of Mind. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, 1-42.
  21. Fodor, J., 1998. Concepts. Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Fodor, J., 2000. The Mind Doesn't Work That Way. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  23. Fodor, J., 2001. Language, Thought and Compositionality. Mind and Language 16, 1, 1-15.
  24. Fodor, J., Bever, Th. G., Garrett, M.F., 1974. The Psychology of Language. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  25. Frazier, L., 1987. Theories of Sentence Processing. In: J. Garfield (ed.). Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 291-307.
  26. Frazier, L., 1990. Exploring the Architecture of the Language-Processing System. In: G.T.M. Altman, (ed.). Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 409-433.
  27. Frazier, L., Clifton, C., 1989. Successive Cyclicity in the Grammar and the Parser. Language and Cognitive Processes 4 (2), 93-126.
  28. Frazier, L., Clifton, C., 1996. Construal. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
  29. Frazier, L., Flores D’Arcais, G.B., 1989. Filler Driven Parsing: a Study of Gap Filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 331-44.
  30. Frazier, L., Villiers, J. (eds), 1990. Language Processing and Language Acquisition. Dordrecht:Kluwer.
  31. Friederici, A.D., 1995. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language 50, 259-281.
  32. Friederici, A., 2003. Neurobiologische Grundlagen der Sprache. In: H.-O. Karnath, Thier, P. (eds). Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer, 215-241.
  33. Friederici, A.D., 2003. Sprachverarbeitung – Der Lauscher im Kopf. Geist und Hirn 2, 43-45.
  34. Friederici, A.D., 2004. Wie der Mensch Sprache versteht. Einblicke ins Gehirn. Bertha Benz-Vorlesung 22. Landenburg: Gottlieb Daimler und Karl Benz Stiftung.
  35. Friederici, A.D., 2005. Neuropsychological markers of early language acquisition: from syllables to sentences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 481-487.
  36. Friederici, A.D., 2006. Neurobiologische Grundlagen der Sprache. In: H.-O. Karnath,Thier, P. (eds), Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer. 2. Aufl., 346-355.
  37. Friederici, A.D. (ed.), 1999. Sprachrezeption. Band 2. Göttingen–Bern–Toronto–Seattle:Hogrefe.
  38. Friederici, A.D., Alter, K., 2004a. Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway view. Brain and Language 89, 267-276.
  39. Friederici, A.D., von Cramon, D.Y., 1999. Neurobiologische Grundlagen des Sprachverstehens.In: A.D. Friederici (ed.). Sprachrezeption. Band 2. Göttingen–Bern–Toronto–Seattle: Hogrefe, 307-349.
  40. Friederici, A.D., Kotz, S.A., 2003a. The brain basis of syntactic processes: Functional imaging and lesion studies. NeuroImage, Special Issue 20, 8-17.
  41. Friederici, A.D., Fiebach, C.J., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I., von Cramon, D.Y., 2006.Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 16, 1709-1717.
  42. Friederici, A.D., Gunter, T.C., Hahne, A., Mauth, K., 2004. The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. NeuroReport 15, 165-169.
  43. Friederici, A.D., Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Hahne, A., Friebach, C.J., 2003b. The role of the left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex 13, 170-177.
  44. Friederici, A.D., von Cramon, D.Y., Kotz, S.A., 2007. Role of the corpus callosum in speech comprehension: Interfacing syntax and prosody. Neuron 53 (1), 135-145.
  45. Friederici, A.D., Meyer, M., von Cramon, D.Y., 2000. Auditory language comprehension: An event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain and Language 74, 289-300.
  46. Garfield, J. (ed.), 1987. Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  47. Garrett, M.F., 1980. Levels of Processing in Sentence Production. In: Butterworth, B. (ed.). Language Production. Vol. 1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press, 66-97.
  48. Garrett, M.F., 1988. Processes in Language Production. In: Newmeyer, F.J. (ed.). Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Press, 69-96.
  49. Hagoort, P., 2003. How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. NeuroImage 20 (Suppl. 1), 18-29.
  50. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., Petersson, K.M., 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304, 438-41.
  51. Hartje, W., 2002. Funktionelle Asymmetrie der Großhirnhemisphären. In: Hartje, W., Poeck, K. (eds). Klinische Neuropsychologie. New York–Stuttgart: Thieme, 67-92.
  52. Hartje, W.K., Poeck, K. (eds), 2002. Klinische Neuropsychologie. New York–Stuttgart: Thieme.Henderson J. M., Ferreira F. (eds), 2004. The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World. New York: Psychology Press.
  53. Herrmann, Th., 1985. Allgemeine Sprachpsychologie. München: Urban & Scharzenberg.
  54. Herrmann, Th., Grabowski, J., 1994. Sprechen: Psychologie der Sprachproduktion. Heidelberg:Spektrum.
  55. Hickock, G., Poeppel, D., 2000. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (4), 131-138.
  56. Indefrey, P., Levelt, W.J.M., 2004. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92, 101-144.
  57. Jackendoff, R., 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  58. Jackendoff, R., Pinker, S., 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for the evolution of language. Cognition 97, 211-225.
  59. Karnath, H.-O., Thier P. (ed.), 2006. Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer.
  60. Kotz, S.A., Frisch, S., von Cramon, D.Y., Friederici, A.D., 2003. Syntactic language processing: ERP lesion data on the role of the basal ganglia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 9, 1053-1060.
  61. Levelt, W.J.M., 1989. Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  62. Levelt, W.J.M. (ed.), 1992. Accessing words in speech production: stages, processes and representations. Cognition 42, 1-22.
  63. Levelt, W.J.M. (ed.), 1993. Lexical Access in Speech Production. Oxford: Blackwell.