Mots-clés
intercultural competence
theme-based qualitative content analysis
meta-analysis
normativity
moral turn
reflexivity of paradigms
Comment citer
Résumé
Since the start of the new millennium, research into intercultural communication and intercultural competence has embarked on an open debate on normative orientations for action in situations of intercultural contact. The contribution at hand presents the preliminary results and impressions from a thematic qualitative content analysis of central academic publications on intercultural communication from the past six decades. Earlier utilitarian paradigms on the one side and a growing outreach towards interpretative paradigms from ethnographic research have, of late, steered intercultural communication research into a moral vacuum. Since then, the discipline can be characterized as undergoing a moral turn. As a consequence, future research may face an opportunity of reflecting on its own moral paradigms in order to produce even more precise orientations for action in intercultural contacts
Références
Adamczak-Krysztofowicz, S. (2014). Interkulturelle Begegnungsdidaktik für angehende Fremdsprachenlehrende: Theorie und Praxis. In: S. Adamczak-Krysztofowicz / A. Szczepaniak-Kozak (Hrsg.), Kultur – Kommunikation – Kreativität – Reflexivität. Beiträge zum universitären
Fremdsprachenunterricht (S. 35–46). Frankfurt am Main et al.: Peter Lang.
Benedict, R. (1934). Patterns of Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Bennegadi, R. (1996). Clinical anthropology and mental health for immigrants in France. Medecine Tropicale, 56 (4), 445–452.
Białek, M. (2015). Die Problematik der Interkulturalität in der Glottodidaktik. Glottodidactica. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics 42 (2), 185–197, https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/gl/article/view/5520 [Zugriff 20.08.2018].
Busch, D. (2013). Im Dispositiv interkultureller Kommunikation. Dilemmata und Perspektiven eines interdisziplinären Forschungsfelds. Bielefeld: transcript.
Busch, D. / Möller-Kiero, J. (2017). Sustainability and ethnic peace discourse: In search for synergies from bringing together discourses on intercultural communication and on global sustainability. Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies, 10 (Juli), 217–237, http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/371/414 [Zugriff 20.08.2018].
Byram, M. (1995). Acquiring intercultural competence. A review of learning theories. In: L. Sercu (Hrsg.), Intercultural competence. A New Challenge for Language Teachers and Trainers in Europe (S. 53–69). Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
Clifford, J. / Marcus, G. E. (Hrsg) (1986). Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Cotkin, G. (2008). History’s Moral Turn. Journal of the History of Ideas, 69 (2), 293–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2008.0011.
Dahlén, T. (1997). Among the Interculturalists. An Emergent Profession and its Packaging of Knowledge. Stockholm: Department of Social Anthropology.
Deardorff, D. K. (Hrsg) (2009). The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence. Thousand Oaks / London / New Delhi / Singapore: Sage.
Dervin, F. (2016). Interculturality in Education: A Theoretical and Methodological Toolbox. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ferri, G. (2014). Ethical communication and intercultural responsibility: a philosophical perspective. Language and Intercultural Communication, 14 (1), 7–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2013.866121.
Ferri, G. (2018). Intercultural Communication – Critical Approaches and Future Challenges. Cham,CH: Palgrave Macmillan.
Haas, H. (2009). Das interkulturelle Paradigma. Passau: Verlag Karl Stutz.
Hall, E. T. (1955). The anthropology of manners. Scientific American, 192, 85–89.
Hansen, K. P. (2007). Kritische Überlegungen zum interkulturellen Paradigma. In: B. Kuhn / M. Pitz / A. Schorr (Hrsg.), „Grenzen“ ohne Fächergrenzen (S. 149–178). St. Ingbert: Röhrig.
Holliday, A. (2011). Intercultural Communication and Ideology. Los Angeles / London / New Delhi / Singapore / Washington DC: Sage.
Holliday, A. (2016). Revisiting intercultural competence: Small culture formation on the go through threads of experience. International Journal of Bias, Identity and Diversities in Education, 1 (2), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJBIDE.2016070101.
Hoskins, B. / Sallah, M. (2011), Developing intercultural competence in Europe: The challenges. Language and Intercultural Communication, 11 (2), 113–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2011.556739.
Jia, W. / Rothchild, P. (2018). A Multitude of Cultural Dreams and Their Implications for a Better World. In: W. Jia (Hrsg.), Intercultural Communication. Adapting to Emerging Global Realities. Second Edition (S. 3–25). San Diego: Cognella.
Kirloskar-Steinbach, M. / Dharampal-Frick, G. / Friele, M. (2012). Die Interkulturalitätsdebatte – Leit- und Streitbegriffe. Intercultural Discourse – Key and Contested Concepts. Freiburg / München:Karl Alber.
Kramsch, C. (2011). The symbolic dimensions of the intercultural. Language Teaching, 44 (3), 354–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444810000431.
Kramsch, C. (2013). Teaching culture and intercultural competence. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Chichester: Wiley Online Library. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1153.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2007). Cultural Globalization and Language Education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Leung, K. / Ang, S. / Tan, M. L. (2014). Intercultural Competence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 489–519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091229.
Lustig, M. W. / Koester, J. (1999). Intercultural Competence: Interpersonal Competence Across Cultures. Boston et al.: Pearson.
Martin, J. N. / Hammer, M. R. (1989). Behavioral categories of intercultural communication competence: Everyday communicators’ perceptions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13 (3), 303–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(89)90015-1.
Mead, G. H. / Morris, C. W. (1934). Mind, Self & Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Möller-Kiero, J. / Busch, D. (2018). How to survive as a visionary in the intercultural world: Towards an awareness of paradigms for tackling pitfalls and chances of Western academia’s moral philosophies. In: W. Jia (Hrsg.), Intercultural Communication. Adapting to Emerging Global Realities. 2nd edition (S. 57–76). San Diego: Cognella.
Moosmüller, A. (1997). Kulturen in Interaktion. Deutsche und US-amerikanische Firmenentsandte in Japan. Münster / New York / München / Berlin: Waxmann.
Moosmüller, A. (2004). Das Kulturkonzept in der interkulturellen Kommunikation aus ethnologischer Sicht. In: H.-J. Lüsebrink (Hrsg.), Konzepte der Interkulturellen Kommunikation. Theorieansätze und Praxisbezüge in interdisziplinärer Perspektive (S. 45–67). St. Ingbert: Röhrig.
Moosmüller, A. (2007). Interkulturelle Kommunikation aus ethnologischer Sicht. In: A. Moosmüller (Hrsg.), Interkulturelle Kommunikation – Konturen einer Disziplin, herausgegeben von Alois Moosmüller (S. 13–49). Münster / München / New York / Berlin: Waxmann.
Nakayama, T. K. / Halualani, R. T. (Hrsg.) (2010). The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1998). Cultivating Humanity. A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
O’Regan, J. P. / MacDonald, M. N. (2007). Cultural relativism and the discourse of intercultural communication: Aporias of praxis in the intercultural public sphere. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7 (4), 267–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/laic287.0.
Pfeiffer, W. (1986). Wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlagen des Fremdsprachenunterrichts. Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Zeitschrift zur Theorie und Praxis des Deutschunterrichts für Ausländer, 1986 (4), 215–219.
Pfeiffer, W. (2008). Zum Paradigmenwechsel und seinen Implikationen in der wissenschaftlichen Glottodidaktik. Ein Diskussionsbeitrag. In: B. Mikołajczyk, M. Kotin (Hrsg.), Terra grammatica. Ideen – Methoden – Modelle. Festschrift für Jósef Darski zum 65. Geburtstag (S. 309–318). Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien: Peter Lang.
Phipps, A. M. (2007). Learning the Arts of Linguistic Survival: Languaging, Tourism, Life. Clevedon: Channel View.
Rogers, E. M. / Hart, W. B. (2002). The histories of intercultural, international, and development communication. In: W. B. Gudykunst, B. Mody (Hrsg.), Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication. Second Edition (S. 1–18). Thousand Oaks / London / New Delhi: Sage.
Sandage, S. J. / Harden, M. G. (2011). Relational spirituality, differentiation of self, and virtue as predictors of intercultural development. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 14, 819–838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2010.527932.
Savicki, V. (Hrsg.) (2010). Developing Intercultural Competence and Transformation: Theory, Research and Application in International Education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Scollon, R. / Wong Scollon, S. (1997). Intercultural Communication. A Discourse Approach. Oxford / Cambridge: Blackwell.
Selby, R. (2010). Designing transformation in international education. In: V. Savicki (Hrsg.), Developing Intercultural Competence and Transformation: Theory, Research and Application in International Education (S. 1–10). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Smith, D. M. (1997). Geography and Ethics: A Moral Turn? Progress in Human Geography, 21 (4), 583–90. DOI: https://doi.org/0.1191/030913297673492951.
Spivak, G. C. (1993). An Interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, conducted by Sara Danius and Stefan Jonsson. Boundary 2: An International Journal of Literature and Culture, 20, 24–50.
Stier, J. (2006). Internationalization, intercultural communication and intercultural competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 11, 1–12.
Taylor, E. W. 1994. Intercultural competency: A transformative learning process. Adult Education Quarterly, 44 (3), 154–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369404400303.
Licence
Auteurs
Les auteurs de textes acceptés pour publication dans la revue Glottodidactica sont tenus de remplir, signer et renvoyer à l'adresse de la rédaction, un accord sur l'octroi d'une licence gratuite pour les œuvres, avec obligation d'accorder une sous-licence CC.
Conformément à cet accord, les auteurs des textes publiés dans la revue Glottodidactica accordent à l'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań une licence non exclusive et gratuite et autorisent l'utilisation de la sous-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Les auteurs se réservent le droit de disposer librement de l'œuvre.
Utilisateurs
Les utilisateurs d'Internet intéressés ont le droit d'utiliser les œuvres publiées dans la revue Glottodidactica depuis 2016, selon les conditions suivantes :
- Attribution – obligation de fournir, conjointement avec l'œuvre distribuée, des informations sur l'auteur, le titre, la source (lien vers l'œuvre originale, DOI) et la licence elle-même.
- Aucune modification – l'œuvre doit être préservée dans sa forme originale. Sans le consentement de l'auteur, il n'est pas possible de distribuer l'œuvre modifiée sous forme de traductions, publications, etc.
Les droits d'auteur sont réservés pour tous les textes publiés avant 2016.
Autres
L'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań conserve les droits sur la revue dans son ensemble (mise en page, forme graphique, titre, conception de la couverture, logo, etc.).
A PARTIR DE L’ANNEE 2015, LES ARTICLES PUBLIÉS DANS LA REVUE SONT DISPONIBLES SOUS LICENCE CREATIVE COMMONS : https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.fr