Understanding Israeli Start-Up Founders in the context of “Tikkun Olam”

Main Article Content

Tova Persoff

Abstrakt

Context impacts a start-up founder’s behavior, activities and choices. This study uses the three founder identities introduced by Fauchart and Gruber (2011) Darwinian, communitarian and missionary to classify Israeli start-up founders who have created diverse products. It presents an innovative context-based interpretation of Tikkun Olam – which in Hebrew means ‘making the world a better place’ as a possible explanation for the relatively large number of Israeli start-up founders who were found to have a hybrid identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Persoff, T. (2021). Understanding Israeli Start-Up Founders in the context of “Tikkun Olam”. Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja, 20(2), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.14746/kse.2021.20.4
Dział
Artykuły

Referencje

  1. Aardvark Israel (2018), https://aardvarkisrael.com, accessed: 06.05.2021.
  2. Ashforth B.E. (2001), Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity-Based Perspective (LEA’s organization and management series), Mahwah, NJ.
  3. Ashforth B.E., Mael F. (1989), Social Identity Theory and the Organization, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), pp. 20–39, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233729899_Social_Identity_Theory_and_Organization, accessed: 15.11.2020.
  4. Bar R. (2008), Development and Advancement of Youth Volunteering in Israel, Mandel Education Conference, pp. 113–118 [Hebrew], https://www.mandelfoundation.org.il/english/SiteCollectionDocuments/publications/Mandel.book.pdf, accessed: 16.05.2021.
  5. Barrett R., Vershinina N. (2017), Intersectionality of Ethnic and Entrepreneurial Identities: A Study of Post-War Polish Entrepreneurs in an English City, Journal of Small Business Management, 55(3), pp. 430–443, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303322109_Intersectionality_of_Ethnic_and_Entrepreneurial_Identities_A_Study_of_Post-War_Polish_Entrepreneurs_in_an_ English_City, accessed: 14.05.2020.
  6. Bina (2021), https://www.bina.org.il, accessed: 06.05.2021.
  7. Blank S., Dorf B. (2012), The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-by-Step Guide for Building a Great Company, K & S Ranch.
  8. Brewer M.B., Gardner W.L. (1996), Who Is This “We”? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), pp. 83–93, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232469632_Who_Is_This_We_Levels_of_Collective_Identity_and_Self_Representations, accessed: 22.11.2020.
  9. Central Bureau of Statistics (2020), Selected Data from the 2019 Social Survey about Volunteering for the International Volunteer Day [Hebrew], https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/mediarelease/DocLib/2020/389/19_20_389b.pdf, accessed: 05.12.2020.
  10. Cooley C.H. [1902] (1964), Human Nature and the Social Order, New York.
  11. Corbin J., Strauss A. (2015), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th edition), Los Angeles.
  12. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd edition), Thousand Oaks, CA.
  13. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. (eds.) (2011), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th edition), Thousand Oaks, CA.
  14. Donnellon A., Ollila, S., Williams-Middleton K. (2014), Constructing Entrepreneurial Identity in Entrepreneurship Education, The International Journal of Management Education, 12(3), pp. 490– 499, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262975002_Constructing_entrepreneurial_identity_in_entrepreneurship_education, accessed: 01.05.2021.
  15. Fauchart E., Gruber M. (2011), Darwinians, Communitarians and Missionaries: The Role of Founder Identity in Entrepreneurship, The Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), pp. 935–957, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46286385_Darwinians_Communitarians_and_Missionaries_The_Role_of_Founder_Identity_in_Entrepreneurship, accessed: 13.11.2020.
  16. Gecas V. (1982), The Self-Concept, Annual Review of Sociology, 8(1), pp. 1–33, https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000245, accessed: 17.12.2018.
  17. Gecas V., Schwalbe M.L. (1983), Beyond the Looking-Glass Self: Social Structure and Efficacy-Based Self-Esteem, Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(2), pp. 77–88, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/16320244_Beyond_the_Looking-Glass_Self_Social_Structure_and_Efficacy-Based_Self-Esteem, accessed: 28.10.2020.
  18. Gioia D.A. (1998), From Individual to Organizational Identity, [in:] D.A. Whetten, P.C. Godfrey (eds.), Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversations, Thousand Oaks, pp. 17–32.
  19. GivingWay (2021), https://www.givingway.com, accessed: 06.05.2021.
  20. Griffith E. (2014, September 25), Why Startups Fail, According to Their Founders, Fortune, Leadership, Startups, https://fortune.com/2014/09/25/why-startups-fail-according-to-their-founders/, accessed: 27.11.2017.
  21. Helpi (2020), https://www.helpi.org.il/?keyword=%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94 , accessed: 04.05.2021.
  22. Hewitt J.P. (2000), Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology (8th edition), Boston.
  23. Hogg M. (2012), Organizational Orthodoxy and Corporate Autocrats: Some Nasty Consequences of Organizations Identification in Uncertain Times, [in:] C.A. Bartel, S. Blader, A. Wrzesniewski (eds.), Identity and the Modern Organization, London, pp. 35–59.
  24. Israeli Knesset, Research and Information Center (2015, July 25), https://fs.knesset.gov.il/globaldocs/MMM/7d1107dc-1277-e511-80d1-00155d0ad6b2/2_7d1107dc-1277-e51180d1-00155d0ad6b2_11_8454.pdf , accessed: 04.05.2021.
  25. Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2021), https://mfa.gov.il/mfa/foreignpolicy/aid/pages/israel_humanitarian_aid.aspx, accessed: 05.05.2021.
  26. Israeli Network of Volunteers (2021), http://www.ivolunteer.org.il/, accessed: 01.05.2021.
  27. Kvale S., Brinkmann S. (2009), InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, Los Angeles, CA.
  28. Levy R. (2019, December 31), Number of Startups in Israel Declined in 2018, Haaretz, Business Section, https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/business/.premium-number-of-startups-in-israel-declined-in-2018-1.8342259, accessed: 06.10.2020.
  29. Maimonides D. (1180), Repetition of the Bible, Laws of Repentance 3:4.
  30. Mead G.H. (1934), Mind, Self and Society, Chicago.
  31. Nahmani S. (2020), Volunteering in Israel. Mapping and Background Data, Jerusalem Institute for policy research [Hebrew], https://jerusaleminstitute.org.il/en/ , accessed: 10.05.2021.
  32. Patton M.Q. (2015), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th edition), Thousand Oaks, CA.
  33. Project Ten (2021), https://www.project-ten.co.il/t-en, accessed: 05.05.2021.
  34. Ruach Tova (2020), https://www.ruachtova.org.il/, accessed: 03.05.2021.
  35. Schumpeter J.A. (1939), Business Cycles, Cambridge, UK.
  36. Senor D., Singer S. (2009), Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle, New York.
  37. Sieger P., Gruber M., Fauchart E., Zellweger T. (2016), Measuring the Social Identity of Entrepreneurs: Scale Development and International Validation, Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), pp. 542–572, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883902616300325, accessed: 16.05.2021.
  38. Startup Genome (2020), The Global Startup Ecosystem Report GSER 2020, https://startupgenome.com/reports/gser2020, accessed: 16.05.2021.
  39. State of Israel, Ministry of Education, Social and Youth Administration (2021), https://edu.gov.il/noar/minhal/Pages/hp.aspx, accessed: 05.05.2021.
  40. Strauss A.L., Corbin J. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  41. Stryker S., Burke P.J. (2000), The Past, Present and Future of an Identity Theory, Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), pp. 284–297, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d9d9/f9f83697e9de8920190d955b3c427030497b.pdf?_ga=2.27771390.374828516.1593334498-321731854.1563098550, accessed: 01.04.2020.
  42. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. (1979), An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict, [in:] M.J. Hatch, M. Schultz (eds.), Organizational Identity, New York.
  43. Tribu (2021), www.we-tribu.com, accessed: 05.05.2021.
  44. Turner J.C. (1968), The Self-Conception in social interaction, [in:] C. Gordon, K.J. Gergen, (eds.), The Self in Social Interaction, New York, pp. 93–106.
  45. Welter F., Baker T., Audretsch D.B., Gartner W.B. (2017), Everyday Entrepreneurship – A Call for Entrepreneurship Research to Embrace Entrepreneurial Diversity, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), pp. 311–321, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/etap.12258, accessed: 01.06.2021.
  46. Ybema S., Keenoy T., Oswick C., Beverungen A., Ellis N., Sabelis I. (2009), Articulating Identities, The Tavistock Institute, 62(3), pp. 299–322, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018726708101904, accessed: 29.12.2018.
  47. Yin R.K. (2003), Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA.