Matoš’s Beauty Problematizations. Following Some Research

Article Sidebar

PDF (Język Polski)
Published: Jan 1, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/pss.2014.7.4
Keywords:
modernism, aesthetic categories, literary construction, style, artistry, the sense of beauty, artistic value, aesthetic value

Main Article Content

Barbara Czapik-Lityńska

Abstract

The article describes the transformations of the traditional category of beauty in the Croatian modernist discourse. Based on the analysis of works of Matoš, we offer a study of modernist concepts of beauty, manifested in the relations between beauty, art and life. The discourse in question simultaneously transforms and explains the sense of beauty, introduces into the world of aesthetic and artistic values central to the culture of modernism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Czapik-Lityńska, B. (2014). Matoš’s Beauty Problematizations. Following Some Research. Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne, (7), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.14746/pss.2014.7.4
Issue
No. 7 (2014): Antun Gustav Matoš
Section
Antun Gustav Matoš

Authors

The authors of the articles accepted for publication in the journal Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne are obliged to fill up the contract for providing the journal free licence (along with sub-licence CC) to works. The contract should be also signed by the authors and sent back to the editorial board of the journal.

Under the terms of the contract, the authors of the texts published in the journal Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne provide the University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań with a non-exclusive free licence and allow the aforementioned institution to use the sub-licence Creative Commons   Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).  (under 10.2020:  Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International CC BY-ND 4.0).

The authors hold the copyright for their texts.

Users

The Internet users are eligible for using the works published in Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne from 2015 under the following conditions:

  • recognition of the authorship: the popularized work must contain information about the author, title, source (references to the original work, DOI) and licence.

The copyright to the texts published before 2015 is reserved.

Other

The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań holds the right for the entire journal (its segmentation, graphical form, title, cover design, logo, etc.).

References

  1. Buczyńska-Garewicz H., 2010, Człowiek wobec losu, Kraków.
  2. Gołaszewska M., 1990, Istota i istnienie wartości. Studium o wartościach estetycznych na tle sytuacji aksjologicznej, Warszawa.
  3. Flaker A., 1982, Poetika osporavanja, Zagreb.
  4. Frangeš I., 1974, Matoš, Vidrić, Krleža, Zagreb.
  5. Frangeš I., 2005, Riječ što traje, Zagreb.
  6. Friedrich H., 1978, Struktura nowoczesnej liryki. Od połowy XIX wieku do połowy XX wieku, przeł. E. Felisiak, Warszawa.
  7. Jadacki J.J., 2003, Człowiek i jego świat, Warszawa.
  8. Jan Paweł II, 2005, Pamięć i tożsamość, Kraków.
  9. Kaštelan J., 1957, Lirika Antuna Gustava Matoša, Zagreb.
  10. Katušić B, 2000, Slast kratkih spojeva, Zagreb.
  11. Kravar Z., Oraić Tolić D., 1996, Antun Gustav Matoš, Zagreb.
  12. Matoš A.G., 1972, Književnost i književnici, w: Programi i manifesti u hrvatskoj književnosti, red. M. Šicel, Zagreb, s. 187–199.
  13. Matoš A.G., 1993, Izbor iz djela, red. I. Frangeš, Zagreb.
  14. Oraić Tolić D., 1980, Pejzaž u djelu A.G. Matoša, Zagreb.
  15. Oraić Tolić D., 1996, Paradigme 20. stoljeća. Awangarda i postmoderna, Zagreb.
  16. Pacewicz A., 2004, Między Dobrem a Jednością. Związek Dobra i Jedna w filozofi i Platona Starej Akademii i Arystotelesa, Wrocław.
  17. Read H., 1994, Sens sztuki, przeł. K. Tarnowska-Konarek, Warszawa.
  18. Stamać A., 1977, Slikovno i pojmovno pjesništvo, Zagreb.
  19. Stróżewski W., 2002, Wokół piękna. Szkice z estetyki, Kraków.
  20. Stróżewski W., 2013, Logos, wartość, miłość, Kraków.
  21. Šicel M., 1978, Povijest hrvatske književnosti, knj. 5, Književnost moderne, Zagreb.
  22. Tatarkiewicz W., 1976, Dzieje sześciu pojęć, Warszawa.
  23. Turowski A., 2006, Malowanie nocy, w: Dzieło, języki, tradycje, red. W. Bolecki, R. Nycz, Warszawa, s. 283–288.
  24. Tyszczyk A., 2007, Od strony wartości. Studia z pogranicza teorii literatury i estetyki, Lublin.
  25. Žmegač V., 1997, Duh impresionizma i secesije. Studije o književnosti hrvatske moderne, Zagreb.