About the [Re]Constructions of Matoš in Histories of Literature

Article Sidebar

PDF (Hrvatski)
Published: Jan 1, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/pss.2014.7.17
Keywords:
Antun Gustav Matoš, narration, nation, history and story, ideologemes and mythologemes, philological level of analytical process, reconstruction and deconstruction in reading literary history

Main Article Content

Boris Škvorc

Abstract

This article deals with the constructions of „Matoš” in Croatian histories of literature. Central for the study is Alum Munslow’s thesis that history cannot be „non-narrative”. In that respect the relationship between hi/story and narrative genre is studied on examples of how the „character” of Antun Gustav Matoš, one of the most famous Croatian writers from the beginning of twentieth century, is both perceived and constructed in historical narrative and in philological context that is discursively circled by the narrative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Škvorc, B. (2014). About the [Re]Constructions of Matoš in Histories of Literature. Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne, (7), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.14746/pss.2014.7.17
Issue
No. 7 (2014): Antun Gustav Matoš
Section
Antun Gustav Matoš

Authors

The authors of the articles accepted for publication in the journal Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne are obliged to fill up the contract for providing the journal free licence (along with sub-licence CC) to works. The contract should be also signed by the authors and sent back to the editorial board of the journal.

Under the terms of the contract, the authors of the texts published in the journal Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne provide the University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań with a non-exclusive free licence and allow the aforementioned institution to use the sub-licence Creative Commons   Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).  (under 10.2020:  Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International CC BY-ND 4.0).

The authors hold the copyright for their texts.

Users

The Internet users are eligible for using the works published in Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne from 2015 under the following conditions:

  • recognition of the authorship: the popularized work must contain information about the author, title, source (references to the original work, DOI) and licence.

The copyright to the texts published before 2015 is reserved.

Other

The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań holds the right for the entire journal (its segmentation, graphical form, title, cover design, logo, etc.).

References

  1. Ankersmit F.R., 2005, Sublime Historical Experience, Stanford.
  2. Bhabha Homi K., 1994, The Location of Culture, London.
  3. Compagnon A., 2007, Demon Teorije, prev. M. Čale, Zagreb.
  4. Derrida J., 2007, Pisanje i razlika, prev. V. Mikšić, Sarajevo–Zagreb.
  5. Eagleton T., 1991, Ideology. An Introduction, London.
  6. Eagleton T., 2005, Teorija i nakon nje, prev. D. Polšek, Zagreb.
  7. Foucault M., 2002, Riječi i stvari. Arheologija humanističkih znanosti, prev. S. Rehelić, Zagreb.
  8. Frangeš I., 1987, Povijest hrvatske književnosti, Zagreb–Ljubljana.
  9. Jameson F., 2009, Ideologies of Theory, London.
  10. Jelčić D., 1997, Povijest hrvatske književnosti. Tisućljeće od Baščanske ploče do postmoderne, Zagreb.
  11. Krleža M., 1979, Nekoliko riječi o malograđanskom historicizmu uopće, u: Eseji i članci. Sabrana djela Miroslava Krleže, ur. A. Malinar, Zagreb–Sarajevo.
  12. Munslow A., 2006, Deconstructing History, London–New York.
  13. Novak S.P., 2003, Povijest hrvatske književnosti, Zagreb.
  14. Rorty R., 1989, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, New York.
  15. Šicel M., 2005, Moderna, sv. 3, Povijest hrvatske književnosti, Zagreb.
  16. Todorov T., 1977, The Poetics of Prose, prev. R. Howard, Ithaca.
  17. White H., 1978, Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism, Baltimore.