Abstract
My article compares the catalogues and interfaces of a small and a big VOD provider and emphasizes the critical innovative potential of the intervention of the former and, more generally, of small streaming services. I employ a cultural studies approach and closely read the acts of curation of these two types of providers. As a case study, I focus on the curation of the feature film The Death of Mr. Lăzărescu on both platforms. By critical innovation, I understand an economic or industrial intervention that questions and disrupts hegemonic discourses in its field. In the case of VODs, it refers to an engagement with discourses on digital film consumption, the branding of premium content, establishment of taste, and diversity of content. I also approach critical innovation as political and economic. I provide proof that small non-profit providers set up more advantageous viewing experiences that benefit a film and its makers. I also show that they play an important role in maintaining the sustainability of a digital distribution ecosystem.
Funding
Ministry of Research Innovation and Digitization CNCS UEFISCDI
References
Aigrain P., Sharing: Culture and the Economy in the Internet Age, Amsterdam 2012 Arnold S., Net ix and the Myth of Choice/Participation/Autonomy, [in:] The Netflix Effect: Technology and Entertainment in the 21st Century, eds. K. McDonald, D. Smith-Rowsey, New York 2016, pp. 69–86
Barker A., L. Abboud, US Streaming Giants Feel Squeeze of Regulation in Europe, “The Financial Times,” February 8, 2022, <https://www.ft.com/content/bf70ada3-70fd-4fcb-b4e8-638bcc053025>, accessed: 15.02.2022
Biesen S.C., Binge-Watching ‘Noir’ at Home: Reimagining Cinematic Reception and Distribution via Netflix, [in:] The Netflix Effect: Technology and Entertainment in the 21st Century, eds. K. McDonald, D. Smith-Rowsey, New York 2016, pp. 167–183
Carchedi G., High-Tech Hype: Promises and Realities of Technology in the Twenty--First Century, [in:] Cutting Edge: Technology, Information Capitalism and Social Revolution, eds. J. Davis, T.A. Hirschl, M. Stack, New York 1997
Goulet F., Vinck D., Moving towards Innovation through Withdrawal: The Neglect of Destruction, [in:] Critical Studies of Innovation: Alternative Approaches to the Pro-innovation Bias, eds. B. Godin, B. Vinck, London 2017
Elsaesser T., European Cinema. Face to Face with Hollywood, Amsterdam 2005 https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053565940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053565940
Lobato R., Netflix Nations, New York 2019 https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479882281.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479882281.001.0001
Lowensohn J., The Science behind Netflix’s First Major Redesign in Four Years, “The Verge”, May 22, 2015,<http://www.theverge.com/2015/5/22/8642359/the-science-behind-the-new-netflixdesign>, accessed: 11.06.2015
Luckerson V., 2015 Will Be the Year Netflix Goes ‘Full HBO’, “Time”, January 20, 2015, <http://time.com/3675669/netflix-hbo/>, accessed: 15.01.2022
McDonald K., Smith-Rowsey D., Introduction, [in:] The Netflix Effect: Technology and Entertainment in the 21st Century, eds. K. McDonald, D. Smith-Rowsey, New York 2016, pp. 14–28
Parvulescu C., Romanian Films for the World: The Cultural Embedding of an Independent VOD, “Studies in World Cinema” 2022, pp. 1–19, https://doi. org/10.1163/26659891-bja10015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/26659891-bja10015
Parvulescu C., Hanzlík J., Beyond Postsocialist and Small: Recent Film Production Practices and State Support for Cinema in Czechia and Romania, “Studies in European Cinema” 2020, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/17411548.2020.1 736794
Pratap A., Netflix SWOT Analysis, updated: November 2, 2021, <https://notesmatic.com/netflix-swot-analysis/>, accessed: 20.02.2022
Schwartz B., The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less, New York 2004
Smith-Rowsey D., Imaginative Indices and Deceptive Domains: How Netflix’s Categories and Genres Redefine the Long Tail, [in:] The Netflix Effect: Technology and Entertainment in the 21st Century, eds. K. McDonald, D. Smith-Rowsey, New York 2016, pp. 87–107
Ulin J., The Business of Media Distribution: Monetizing Film, TV and Video Content in an Online World, London 2014
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Constantin Parvulescu
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors
Authors of texts accepted for publication in Images are required to complete, sign and return to the editor's office the Agreement for granting a royalty-free license to works with a commitment to grant a CC sub-license.
Under the agreement, the authors of texts published in Images grant the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań a non-exclusive, royalty-free license and authorize the use of Attribution 4.0. License (CC BY 4.0). Creative Commons sub-license.
The authors retain the right to continue the free disposal of the work.
Users
Interested Internet users are entitled to use works published in Images since 2016, for non-commercial purposes only, under the following conditions:
- attribution - obligation to provide, together with the distributed work, information about the authorship, title, source (link to the original work, DOI) and the license itself.
- no derivatives - the work must be preserved in its original form, without the author's consent it is not possible to distribute the modified work, such as translations, publications, etc.
Copyrights are reserved for all texts published before 2016.
Miscellaneous
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań retains the right to magazines as a whole (layout, graphic form, title, cover design, logo etc.).