Słowa kluczowe
strategie uczenia się języków obcych
cechy osobowości
otwartość na doświadczenie
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
The study described in the present paper aimed to account for all the three dimensions of learners’ strategic self-regulation, i.e. cognitive, affective, and sociocultural-interactive language learning strategies (LLS) (Oxford 2011), and attempted to explore their relationships with learners’ personality and other individual variables, such as gender, type of university and area of studies, or the level of proficiency in English. The participants of the study, who formed a representative sample of BA/BS students of AMU and WSB University (722 students in total), completed two questionnaires, a Polish adaptation of SILL ver. 7.0 (Oxford 1990), and the adaptation of NEO-FFI recommended by the Polish Association of Psychology (Zawadzki et al. 2010) for research. The goodness criteria for psychometric research tools (Hornowska 2007) were analysed for both questionnaires. The obtained results confirm the role of most of the above-mentioned individual characteristics in strategy choice, validate the importance of learners’ personality in language learning, and provide evidence of the significance of openness to experience in learning a foreign language.
Bibliografia
Aharony, N. 2006. „The use of deep and surface learning strategies among students learning English as a foreign language in an Internet environment”. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76: 851-866.
Brzezińska, A., Appelt, A. K. i B. Ziółkowska. 2016. Psychologia rozwoju człowieka. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Brzeziński, J. 2004. Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Warszawa: PWN.
Brzeziński, J. i T. Maruszewski. 1978. „Metoda sędziów kompetentnych i jej zastosowanie w badaniach pedagogicznych”. Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny, 23: 569-587.
Costa, P. T. Jr. i R. R. McCrae. 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Dörnyei, Z. i S. Ryan. 2015. The psychology of the language learner revisited. London: Routledge.
Ehrman, M. i R. Oxford. 1988. „Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies”. The Modern Language Journal, 73: 1-13.
Ehrman, M. i R. Oxford. 1990. „Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting”. The Modern Language Journal, 74: 311-327.
Gerami, M. H. i S. M. G. Baighlou. 2011. „Language learning strategies used by successful and unsuccessful Iranian EFL students”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29: 1567-1576.
Główka, D. 2013.Wpływ czynników społecznych na poziom opanowania języka angielskiego jako języka obcego. Repozyturium Wydziału Anglistyki UAM.
Grainger, P. 2012. „The impact of cultural background on the choice of language learning strategies in the JFL context”. System, 40: 483-493.
Green, J. M. i R. L. Oxford. 1995. „A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender”. TESOL Quarterly, 29: 261-297.
Gregersen, T., Martínez, V. R., Rojas, P. P. i E. L. Alvarado. 2001. „Can foreign language learning strategies turn into crutches?: A pilot study on the use of strategies by successful and unsuccessful language learners”. Revista Signos, 34: 101-111.
Griffiths, C. 2003. „Patterns of language learning strategy use”. System, 31: 367-383.
Hoff, J. G. i R. M. Paige. 2008. „A strategies-based approach to culture and language learning in education abroad programming”. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 17: 89-106.
Hornowska, E. 2007. Testy psychologiczne. Teoria i praktyka. Tom 6. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Jakobovits, L. A. 1970. Foreign language learning: A psycholinguistic analysis of the issues. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers.
Khamkhien, A. 2012. „Proficiency, motivation, and classroom anxiety and their effects on language learning strategies used by Thai EFL learners”. Rangsit Journal of Arts and Sciences, 2: 85-98.
Kunasaraphan, K. 2015. „English learning strategy and proficiency level of the first year students”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197: 1853-1858.
Lai, Y. C. 2009. „Language learning strategy use and English proficiency of university freshmen in Taiwan”. TESOL Quarterly, 43: 255-280.
Lee, K. R. i R. L. Oxford. 2008. „Understanding EFL learners’ strategy use and strategy awareness”. Asian EFL Journal, 10: 7-32.
Liyanage, I. i B. Bartlett. 2013. „Personality types and languages learning strategies: Chameleons changing colours”. System, 41: 598-608.
Magogwe, J. M. i R. Oliver. 2007. „The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana”. System, 35: 338-352.
Nyikos, M. 2008. „Gender and good language learners”. (w) Lessons from good language learners. (red. C. Griffiths). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, str. 73-82.
Nyikos, M. i R. Oxford. 1993. „A factor analytic study of language-learning strategy use: Interpretations from information-processing theory and social psychology”. The Modern Language Journal, 77: 11-22.
Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
Oxford, R. L. (red.). 1996. Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. No. 13. Hanoa: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’i.
Oxford, R. L. 1999. „Relationships between second language learning strategies and language proficiency in the context of learner autonomy and self-regulation”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 38: 108-26.
Oxford, R. L. 2011. Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Longman.
Oxford, R. L. i M. Nyikos. 1989.„Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students”. The Modern Language Journal, 73: 291-300.
Paige, R. M., Cohen, A. D. i R. L. Shively. 2004. „Assessing the Impact of a Strategies-Based Curriculum on Language and Culture Learning Abroad”. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10: 253-276.
Politzer, R. L. 1983. „An exploratory study of self reported language learning behaviors and their relation to achievement”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6: 54-68.
Salahshour, F., Sharifi, M. i N. Salahshour. 2013. „The relationship between language learning strategy use, language proficiency level and learner gender”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70: 634-643.
Sorokowska, A., Słowińska, A., Zbieg, A. i P. Sorokowski. 2014. Polska adaptacja testu Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI)-TIPI-PL-wersja standardowa i internetowa. Wrocław: Wroclab.
Wakamoto, N. 2000. „Language learning strategy and personality variables: Focusing on extroversion and introversion”. IRAL, 38: 71-81.
White, C. 2008. „Beliefs about language learning”, (w) Lessons from good language learners. (red. C. Griffiths). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, str. 121-130.
Wolters, C. A. 1999. „The relation between high school students' motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance”. Learning and Individual Differences, 11: 281-299.
Yang, N. D. 1999. „The relationship between EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy use”. System, 27: 515-535.
Yılmaz, C. 2010. „The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: a study of ELT learners in Turkey”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2: 682-687.
Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Szczepaniak, P. i M. Śliwińska. 2010. Inwentarz osobowości NEOFFI Paula T. Costy Jr i Roberta R. McCrae: adaptacja polska: podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2017 Jakub Przybył
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Przedstawiany utwór (artykuł) upubliczniany jest na podstawie umowy z autorem i na licencji Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Użytkownicy mają obowiązek podania wraz z rozpowszechnionym utworem, informacji o autorstwie, tytule, źródle (odnośniki do oryginalnego utworu, DOI) oraz samej licencji;
- bez tworzenia utworów zależnych,
- utwór musi być zachowany w oryginalnej postaci.
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu zachowuje prawo do czasopisma jako całości (układ, forma graficzna, tytuł, projekt okładki, logo itp.).