Interactivity as a key feature redefining documentary reality

Main Article Content

Frédéric Dubois

Abstrakt

Finding a clear-cut boundary delimiting fiction from documentary has always been a controversial, daunting and unthankful undertaking. In the last decade, the blur between the two genres has been reinforced by the rapid advancement of web and AR/VR technologies. Interactive web-documentaries and virtual reality documentaries do not only promote new viewing habits – from swiping smartphone screens to scanning horizons with VR headsets, they shake up the very idea of what a documentary is. In this short scholarly essay, I argue that the feature of interactivity is the driving force redefining the documentary genre. This thesis builds on two case studies: 1) Interactive documentary Atterwasch and 2) VR documentary The Unknown Photographer. In the final section of the essay I revisit the definition of documentary reality and expand it with the addition of André Bazin’s notion of mise en scène.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Dział
Docufiction

Bibliografia

  1. Adams B., “When Docs Get Graphic: Animation Meets Actuality“, in: Documentary Magazine, Spring 2009. Last accessed online on 22 June 2017: <http://www.documentary.org/magazine/when-docs-get-graphic-animation-meets-actuality>
  2. Andersen P.B., A Theory of Computer Semiotics, New York 1997
  3. Aston J., Gaudenzi S., Interactive documentary: setting the field, “Studies in Documentary Film” 2012, Vol. 6, pp. 125–139
  4. Aufderheide P., Ethical Challenges for Documentarians in a User-Centric Environment, in: “New Documentary Ecologies”, Springer 2014, pp. 237–250
  5. Aufderheide P., Interactive documentaries: navigation and design, “Journal of Film and Video” 2015, Vol. 67, pp. 69–78
  6. Baudet M., Beauséjour B., Sweeney S., The Unknown Photographer, Canada: Turbulent/National Film Board of Canada 2015, Available at:
  7. Bazin A., Le réalisme cinématographique et l’école italienne de la libération. Esprit Nouvelle série, 1948, no. 141(1), pp. 58–83
  8. Bollendorff S., Ségrétin A., Journey to the End of Coal, France: Honkytonk Films 2008, Available at: <http://www.honkytonk.fr/index.php/webdoc/>
  9. Britain C., Raising Reality to the Mythic on the Web: The Future of Interactive Documentary Film, Elon 2009
  10. Cardillo S., Armstrong A.M., Standards and Tools for Designing and Developing Interactive Documentaries that Bring About Social Involvement and Change, EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 28. June 28 2016
  11. Charles M., Gyori B., Wolters S., Peñuela J.A.U., Target BACRIM: Blurring Fact and Fiction to Create an Interactive Documentary Game, in: International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, Springer 2017, pp. 349–352
  12. Crick T., The Game Body: Toward a Phenomenology of Contemporary Video Gaming, ”Games and Culture” 2011, Vol. 6(3), pp. 259–269 del Pra’ M., Dubois F., Atterwasch – A scroll documentary, Germany: Reportero/Arte France 2014, Available at: <http://atterwasch.net>
  13. Dovey J., Rose M., We’re happy and we know it: Documentary, data, montage, “Studies in Documentary Film” 2012, Vol. 6, pp. 159–173
  14. Freixa P., Sora C., Soler-Adillon J., Ribas J.I., Snow Fall and A Short History of the Highrise: two approaches to interactive communication design by The New York Times, Textual & Visual Media, 2014v7 63–84
  15. Gaudenzi S., The Living Documentary: from representing reality to co-creating reality in digital interactive documentary, London 2013
  16. Gifreu A., El documental interactiu com a nou gènere audiovisual. Estudi de l’aparició del nou gènere, aproximació a la seva definició i proposta de taxonomia i d’un model d’anàlisi a efectes d’avaluació, disseny i producció. UPF, Communication Department 2012
  17. Grierson J., First Principles of Documentary, 1932, as quoted in C. Fowler (ed.), The European Cinema Reader, 2002, p. 40
  18. Herrero J.V., García X.L., The Use of Social Networks in Interactive Documentary. Book chapter In New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, Springer 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978–3-319–31307–8_43 i-docs: The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentaries, ed. by J. Aston, S. Gaudenzi, Rose M., New York 2017
  19. Jaeger F., Von der Interpassivität zur Tiefenästhetik – Neue Kritik für Neue Medien? / Teil 3. Berlin: Critic.de, 2013. Available at: <http://www.critic.de/special/von-der-interpassivitaet-zur-tiefenaesthetik-neue-kritik-fuer-neue-medien-teil-3–3736/>
  20. Kim N., Kim S., Interactive Documentary as a New Media, “Advanced Science and Technology Letters” 2014, Vol. 52, pp. 120–124
  21. Landreth C., Ryan, Canada: National Film Board of Canada, 2004. Available at: <http://www.nfb.ca/film/ryan/>
  22. Marks L.U., The Skin of the Film, Durham 2000
  23. Nash K., Hight K., Summerhayes C., New Documentary Ecologies: Emerging Platforms, Practices and Discourses, Basingstoke 2014
  24. Nash K., Modes of interactivity: analysing the webdoc, “Media, Culture & Society”, 2012, Vol. 34, Issue 2, pp. 195–210. DOI: 10.1177/0163443711430758
  25. Nash K., Rhetoric of interactivity, “Media, Culture & Society” (forthcoming)
  26. Nash K., What is interactivity for? The social dimension of web-documentary participation, “Continuum” 2014, Vol. 28, pp. 383–395
  27. Nogueira P., Ways of Feeling: audience’s meaning making in interactive documentary through an analysis of Fort McMoney, “Punctum” 2015, 1(1), pp. 79–93
  28. O’Flynn S., Designed Experiences in Interactive Documentaries, “Contemporary Documentary” 2015 Vol. 72.
  29. O’Flynn S., Documentary’s metamorphic form: Webdoc, interactive, transmedia, participatory and beyond, “Studies in Documentary Film” 2012, Vol. 6, pp. 141–157. DOI: 10.1386/sdf.6.2.141_1
  30. Odorico S., Documentary on the web between realism and interaction. A case study: From Zero—People Rebuilding Life after the Emergency (2009), “Studies in Documentary Film” 2011 Vol. 5, pp. 235–246
  31. Rodes G.D., Springer J.P., Docufictions: essays on the intersection of documentary and fictional filmmaking, ed. by G.D. Rhodes and J.P. Springer, Jefferson, NC, 2005
  32. Roth S., The state of design research, “Design Issues”, 1999 Vol. 15(2), pp. 18–26.
  33. Soar M., Book review of i-docs: The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentaries. Accessed on 22 June 2017: <https://cup.columbia.edu/book/i-docs/9780231851077>
  34. Soar M., Making (with) the Korsakow System, in: New Documentary Ecologies, New York 2014, pp. 154–173
  35. Sobchack V., The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience, Princeton 1992
  36. Walls R., Documentary Storytelling Through History. Life Long Learning Centre, Leeds 2016
  37. Wen-Shin Chang A., Transmedia Arts Activism And Language Revitalization: Critical Design, Ethics And Participation In Third Digital Documentary, Santa Cruz 2016