Modern documentary in the age of virtual reality: Deapening engagement with nonfiction storytelling through technological innovation

Main Article Content

Iwona Pomianowska

Abstrakt

After decades of research, technological development as well as few discouraging setbacks, virtual reality (VR) appears to be on the cusp of its settled adoption. The incorporation of VR technology into the palette of everyday communication media is not only exciting for filmmakers and game designers, but also for every manner of storytellers: documentarians, journalists, educators, scientists – all professions involved in clarifying surrounding us reality and communicating about it. They all discovered that social change can be valuably stimulated by development of new technology – technology that serves in the same time as a classic medium to communicate and spread this news around. Considering the factors enabling us to capture and disseminate “a true story” in a highly captivating, immersive way (which previously has been preserved exclusively for entertainment and commercial productions), we should mention at least 3 crucial elements: technological innovation, psychological evolution of the viewer, application of VR beyond storytelling. The first two factors mutually interact and play off each other in terms of the changing threshold of perceptual tolerance as well as rising needs of the new spectator. The first part of this paper deals with the interdependency of these two elements. Structured conclusions will be enumerated as a practical reference for VR storytelling productions. The second part of the paper will deal with the third element enumerating the most inspiring cases from recent years – eye-openers for instigating social change, adding value and promoting wellbeing via VR technology. The engagement of VR in social change, innovation and nonfiction storytelling introduced the VR technology within the current media palette. It not only changes the nature of storytelling about reality, but fulfills the story that our reality builds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Pomianowska, I. (2018). Modern documentary in the age of virtual reality: Deapening engagement with nonfiction storytelling through technological innovation. Images. The International Journal of European Film, Performing Arts and Audiovisual Communication, 21(30), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.14746/i.2017.30.04.
Dział
Docufiction

Bibliografia

  1. ABC News (16.09.2015), <http://www.theverge.com/2015/9/16/9336647/abc-news-virtual-reality-syria> (retrieved on 26.01.2017)
  2. Aronson-Rath, Milward J., Owen T., Pitt F., Virtual Rality Journalism, <https://towcenter.gitbooks.io/virtual-reality-journalism/content/> (retrieved on 13.02.2017)
  3. Balázs B., Early Film Theory: Visible Man and the Spirit of Film, ed. E. Carter and trans. R. Livingstone, Oxford 2010 (1924)
  4. Belting H., An Anthropology of Images: Picture, Medium, Body, Princeton 2011
  5. Bonis B., Stamos J., Vosinakis S., Andreou I., Panayiotopoulos T., A platform for virtual museums with personalized content, “Multimed. Tools Appl.” 2009, 42(2), pp. 139–159
  6. Bruce C., Peyton J.K., Batson T.W., Innovation and Social Change, Chapter 1, Urbana-Champaign Champaign, IL 1993, <https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/43892/Innovation%20and%20Social%20Change.pdf?sequence=2> (retreived on 26.08.2016).
  7. Chalmers D., Spatial Illusions, from Mirrors to virtual reality, 2017, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKRX6CZLZOw> (retreived on 7.08.2017)
  8. Cosmides L., Tooby J., Evolutionary Psychology and the Emotions, Handbook of Emotions, 2nd ed., New York 2000
  9. Craik F.I., Lockhart R.S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research, “Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior” 1972, 11(6), 671–684
  10. Cubitt S., The Cinema Effect, Cambridge, Mass. & London 2004
  11. Deleuze G., Cinéma I: L’image-mouvement”, Paris 1986
  12. Deleuze G., Cinema I: the Movement-Image and Cinema 2: the Time-Image (both trans. Hugh Tomlinson), Minneapolis, MN, 1989
  13. Didi-Huberman G., Confronting Images: Questioning the Ends of a Certain History of Art; trans. John Goodman, University Park, PA 2005
  14. Doyle P., Gelman M., Gill S., Viewing the future? Virtual Reality in Journalism. Knight Foundation, <http://storynext.usatoday.com/state-of-vr.pdf> (retreived on 16.11.2016)
  15. Elsaesser T., Hagener M., Film Theory Introduction through the Senses, New York 2015
  16. Emamdjomeh A., Discovering Gale Crater, “Los Angeles Times” 26.10.2015, <http://graphics.latimes.com/mars-gale-crater-vr/> (retreived on 26.01.2017)
  17. Farman J., Stories, spaces, and bodies: The production of embodied space through mobile media storytelling, “Communication Research and Practice” 2015, Vol. 1, Iss. 2, pp. 101–116, <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22041451.2015.1047941> (retreived on 27.02.2017).
  18. Felix & Paul Studios, Nomads, See Gypsies, <https://www.felixandpaul.com/?projects/sea_gypsies/credits> (retrieved on 30.01.2017)
  19. Felix & Paul Studios, Stranger, <https://www.felixandpaul.com/?projects/strangers> (retrieved on 30.01.2017).
  20. Flaxman G., The Brain Is the Screen. Deleuze and the Philosophy of Cinema, Minneapolis. London 2000.
  21. Fontaine G., The experience of a sense of presence in intercultural and international encounters, “Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments” 1992, 1 (4), pp. 482–490.
  22. Framestore Studio. The Field Trip to Mars, <http://framestorevr.com/field-trip-to-mars/> (retrieved on 18.01.2017)
  23. Friedberg A., Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern, Berkeley, Los Angeles & London 1993
  24. Galloway A.R., Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture, Minneapolis 2006
  25. Garling C., Virtual Reality, Empathy and the Next Journalism, “WIRED Magazine”, <https://www.wired.com/brandlab/2015/11/nonny-de-la-pena-virtual-reality-empathy-and-the-next-journalism/> (retrieved on 03.01.2017)
  26. Garrett S., Between Film and Screen: Modernism’s Photo Synthesis. Chicago 1999
  27. Gibson J.J., A theory of direct visual perception, in: J. Royce, W. Rozenboom (eds.), The Psychology of Knowing, New York 1972
  28. Gregory R., Concepts and Mechanisms of Perception, London 1974
  29. Halper K., CEO of KUMA Reality Games, <http://www.mediafieldsjournal.org/physical-world-news-in-virtual/2011/7/22/physical-world-news-in-virtual-spaces-representation-and-emb.html> (retrieved on 26.01.2017)
  30. Halperin S., Shakow C., The development of identification in Freudian theory, “Psychoanal Review” 1989, 76(3), pp. 353–374
  31. Held R., Durlach N., Telepresence, “Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments” 1992, 1 (1), pp. 109–112.
  32. Hodges L., Anderson P., Burdea G., Hoffman H., Rothbaum B., Treating Psychological and Physical Disorders with VR, “IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications” 2001, invited article, pp. 25–33, November/December
  33. Hydénjava L-C., Storytelling in dementia: Embodiment as a resource, 2013, Vol. 12 iss. 3, pp. 359–367, <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1471301213476290> (retreived on 20.02.2017)
  34. Immordino-Yang M.H., Emotions, Learning, and the Brain: Exploring the Educational Implications of Affective Neuroscience”, New York 2015
  35. Loftus E.F., Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory, “Learning & Memory” 2005, 12 (4), pp. 361–366. doi:10.1101/lm.94705
  36. Loftus E.F., Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley 1980. (Reprinted by NY: Ardsley Press 1988).
  37. Marks L.U., The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses, Durhaim 2000
  38. McGreevy M.W., The presence of field geologists in Mars-like terrain, “Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments” 1992, 1 (4), pp. 375–403
  39. McLuhan M., Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory, London 2004
  40. McLuhan M., Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man, New York 1964
  41. Metz Ch., The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema, Bloomington 1982
  42. Migielicz G., Zacharia J., Stanford Journalism Program’s Guide to Using Virtual Reality for Storytelling – Dos & Don’ts, 2016, <https://medium.com/@StanfordJournalism/stanford-journalism-programs-guide-to-using-virtual-reality-for-storytelling-dos-don ts-f6ca15c7ef3c> (retrieved on 26.01.2017)
  43. Mir A., The post-truth world: how social media destroy the absolutism of the “objective” truth. Human as media, 2017, <https://human-as-media.com/2017/02/22/the-post-truth-world-how-social-media-destroy-the-absolutism-of-the-objective-truth/> (retreived on 3.08.2017)
  44. Montaño Li, Z., Chen V., Gold J., Virtual Reality and pain management: current trends and future directions, “Pain Management” 2011, 1, pp. 147–157
  45. Mutekwe E., The impact of technology on social change: a sociological perspective, “Journal of Research in Peace, Gender and Development” 2012, Vol. 2(11), pp. 226–238, <http://www.interesjournals.org/JRPGD> (retreived on 11.11.2016)
  46. New York Times, VR platform, <http://www.nytimes.com/marketing/nytvr/> (retreived on 26.01.2017).
  47. Özlem Yiğit E., Science, technology and social change course’s effects on technological literacy levels of social studies pre-service teachers, “TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology” 2013, Vol. 12(3), July, <http://www.tojet.net/articles/v12i3/12313.pdf)> (retreived on 15.09.2016)
  48. Peña P. de la, Weil J., Llobera E., Giannopoulos, Pomés A., Spanlang B., Friedman D., Sanchez-Vives M.V., Slater M., Immersive Journalism: Immersive Virtual Reality for the First Person Experience of News, “Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments” 2010, 19, no. 4, pp. 291–301
  49. Peyton P., Interview with Marshall McLuhan on Television Show, “Family Theatre” 1971, 14 November, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uZYR3jmMng#t=16> (retreived on 2.08.2017)
  50. Platoni K., Virtual Reality Aimed At The Elderly Finds New Fans, 2016, <http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/06/29/483790504/virtual-reality-aimed-at-the-elderly-finds-new-fans> (retreived on 03.02.2017)
  51. Post-truth, in: Oxford English dictionary online, 2016, <https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016> (retreived online on 8.08.2017)
  52. Reflections on the life of M.C. Escher (25.09.2012), <https://figbash.com/2012/09/25/reflections-on-the-life-of-m-c-escher-2/> (retreived on 5.01.2017)
  53. Seetharaman D., What does virtual reality do to your body and mind?, 2016, <http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/what-does-virtual-reality-do-to-your-body-and-mind/news-story/53d02a9c507f990da7ab00fa0088c8dd> (retreived on 15.02.2017)
  54. Sheridan T.B., Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence, “Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments” 1992, 1(1), pp. 120–125
  55. Slater M., Wilbur S., A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments, “Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments” 1997, 6(6), pp. 603–616
  56. Sobchak C., Carnal thoughts : embodiment and moving image culture, Berkeley 2004, <https://culturetechnologypolitics.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/vivian-sobchack-carnal-thoughts-1_2.pdf> (retreived on 6.08.2017)
  57. Spicer A.H., Film and visual culture, in: I. Heywood, B. Sandywell, M. Gardiner, N. Gunalan, C.M. Soussloff (eds.), The Handbook of Visual Culture, 2012, (on 10.08.2017)
  58. Spiegelberg H., The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction, 2nd ed., 2 vols., The Hague, 1965
  59. Stark L., Choi Y., Yu Y., Visual Imagery and Virtual Reality. New Evidence Supporting The Scanpath Theory Explains the Illusion of Completeness and Clarity, in: V. Lakshminarayanan (ed.), Basic and Clinical Applications of Vision Science: The Professor Jay M. Enoch Festschrift Volume, Dordrecht 1997
  60. Vertov D., Kino-Eye, 1924.
  61. Webster M.A., Evolving concepts of sensory adaptation, “F1000 Biol. Rep.” 2012, 4, p. 21. doi: 10.3410/B4–21
  62. Willems O.,. Even Pastors Hate the Inconvenience of Computer Lag, 2015, <https://www.psfk.com/2015/06/connection-lag-umenet-b-reel-anr-bbdo-living-with-lag-series.html> (retreived on 16.11.2016)
  63. Witmer B.G., Singer M.J., Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire”, “Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments” 1998, 7(3), pp. 225–240
  64. Yangxingyue, Virtual Reality: A New Perspective in Storytelling 2016, <http://www.newinc.org/blog-post/virtual-reality-a-new-perspective-in-storytelling> (retrieved on 03.12.2016)
  65. Ziulkowski K., Vicious Circle, created by NEW INC, <http://www.karolinaziulkoski.com/> (retreived on 16.11.2016)