In the webs of the Internet: Generation Z and their informal exposure to English
Okładka czasopisma Neofilolog, nr 64/2, rok 2025, tytuł Nauczanie i uczenie się języków obcych a otoczenie społeczno-gospodarcze
PDF (English)

Słowa kluczowe

formalny vs nieformalny wymiar uczenia się
pozaszkolna ekspozycja na język angielski

Jak cytować

Wolanin, A. (2025). In the webs of the Internet: Generation Z and their informal exposure to English. Neofilolog, (64/2), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.14746/n.2025.64.2.7

Abstrakt

Generation Z, a cohort born into the digital age, benefits from unprecedented access to informal English exposure, facilitating implicit language learning and development. However, research on the extramural English (EE) habits of proficient EFL learners in the Polish context remains limited. To address this gap, this study explored the frequency and nature of EE exposure, the types of input learners engage with, and their self-perceived language competence in the context of the informal learning environment. The study involved 120 participants who completed a questionnaire and a vocabulary size test. Subsequently, 10 participants engaged in a qualitative stage by keeping a language diary for 14 days, documenting their informal English exposure in detail, reflecting on their experiences, and participating in follow-up interviews. The findings align with previous studies, highlighting consistent trends in the type and frequency of EE exposure. Notably, the qualitative data provided insight into a wide range of EE activities and revealed that English has become not only the lingua franca of the Internet but also a tool for mediating between other languages. The participants also recognized discrepancies between language input in formal settings and language used in their informal exposure. These findings underscore the importance of integrating EE activities into EFL learning strategies to bridge the gap and introduce more authenticity into the language classroom.

https://doi.org/10.14746/n.2025.64.2.7
PDF (English)

Bibliografia

Arndt H.L., Woore R. (2018), Vocabulary learning from watching YouTube videos and reading blog posts. “Language Learning & Technology”, No 22(1), pp. 124–142.

Benson P. (2011), Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field, (in:) Benson P., Reinders H. (eds.), Beyond the language classroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 7–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306790_2

Craik F.I.M., Lockhart R.S. (1972), Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. “Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior”, No 11, pp. 671–684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X

De Wilde V., Brysbaert M., Eyckmans J. (2020), Learning English through out-of-school exposure: How do word-related variables and proficiency influence receptive vocabulary learning?. “Language Learning”, No 70(2), pp. 349–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12380

De Wilde V., Eyckmans, J. (2017), Game on! Young learners’ incidental language learning of English prior to instruction. “Studies in second language learning and teaching”, No 7(4), pp. 673–694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.4.6

Elgort I., Warren P. (2014), L2 vocabulary learning from reading: explicit and tacit lexical knowledge and the role of learner and item variables. “Language Learning”, No 64(2), pp. 365–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12052

Hannibal Jensen S. (2017), Gaming as an English language learning resource among young children in Denmark. “CALICO Journal”, No 34(1), pp. 1–19.

Krippendorff K. (2003), Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kuppens A.H. (2010), Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. “Learning, media and technology”, No 35(1), pp. 65–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880903561876

Laufer B., Hulstijn J. (2001), Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. “Applied linguistics”, No 22(1), pp. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1

Mayer R.E. (2001), Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Muñoz C., Cadierno T. (2021), How do differences in exposure affect English language learning? A comparison of teenagers in two learning environments. “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No 11(2), pp. 185–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.2.2

Nation P. (2012), The Vocabulary Size Test. Online: https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/resources/paul-nations-resources/vocabulary-tests/the-vocabulary-size-test/Vocabulary-Size-Test-information-and-specifications.pdf [Accessed 09.03.2025].

Niitemaa M. L. (2020), Informal acquisition of L2 English vocabulary: Exploring the relationship between online out-of-school exposure and words at different frequency levels. “Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy”, No 15(2), pp. 86–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-02-02

Peters E., Noreillie A. S., Heylen K., Bulté B., Desmet P. (2019), The impact of instruction and out-of-school exposure to foreign language input on learners’ vocabulary knowledge in two languages. “Language learning”, No 69(3), pp. 747–782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12351

Reinders H., Benson P. (2017), Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. “Language Teaching”, No 50(4), pp. 561–578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000192

Saldana J. (2009), The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.

Sun H., Steinkrauss R., Wieling M., De Bot K. (2018), Individual differences in very young Chinese children’s English vocabulary breadth and semantic depth: Internal and external factors. “International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism”, No 21(4), pp. 405–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1178706

Sundqvist P. (2009), Extramural English matters: Out-of-school English and its impact on Swedish ninth graders’ oral proficiency and vocabulary. Karlstad University (Doctoral dissertation).

Sundqvist P. (2024), Extramural English as an individual difference variable in L2 research: Methodology matters. “Annual Review of Applied Linguistics”, pp. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190524000072

Sundqvist P., Olin-Scheller C. (2013), Classroom vs. extramural English: Teachers dealing with demotivation. “Language and Linguistics Compass”, No 7(6), pp. 329–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12031

Sundqvist P., Uztosun M. S. (2023), Extramural English in Scandinavia and Asia: Scale development, learner engagement, and perceived speaking ability. “TESOL Quarterly”, No 58(4), pp. 1638–1665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3296

Sylvén L.K., Sundqvist P. (2012), Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. “ReCALL”, No 24(3), pp. 302–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200016X

Thorne S.L. (2008), Transcultural communication in open Internet environments and massively multiplayer online games, (in:) Magnan S. (ed.), Mediating discourse online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 305–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.3.17tho