Abstract
This article is an attempt to determine the reasons for difficulties encountered in the interpretation of data collected in the process of conducting action research on developing a reflective attitude in TTC students. The starting point for investigating the above issue is a short presentation of the action research study: the subjects’ aim, and tools employed in the process. The difficulties with interpreting the collected data will be examined mainly from the cognitive perspective, as the description and interpretation relate to internal cognitive processes, observable only in potential change of behaviour. It is significant,
therefore, to work out, among the research participants, a coherent conceptual area referring to the changes under investigation. Interpretation of data is also the result of the quality of interactions among the research participants, which will be presented using the example of relations between the teacher researcher and participant-students and their possible influence on the students’ opinions. The article closes with suggestions for selecting criteria for the interpretation of data being collected.
References
Bazin, H. 2003-2007a. « Questions fréquentes sur la recherche-action ». http://biblio.recherche-action.fr/document.php?id=142 Dokument elektroniczny w: Bazin, H. 2003 – 2007, Bibliographie R-A http://biblio.recherche-action.fr/ DW: 14.10.2009
Bazin, H. 2003-2007b. « Questions fréquentes sur la recherche-action ». http://recherche-action.fr/pages/manual12/principaux-courants/recherche-action-participative.php Dokument elektroniczny w: Bazin,
H. 2003 – 2007, Portal recherche-action.fr, http://recherche-action.fr/pages/portail/introduction-a-la-recherche-action.php DW: 14.10.2009
Bazin, H.2006. « Comparaison entre recherche-action et recherche classique». http://biblio.recherche-action.fr/document.php?id=137#tocto2
Dokument elektroniczny w: Bazin, H. 2003 – 2007, Bibliographie R-A http://biblio.recherche-action.fr/ DW: 14.10.2009
Le Boterf, G. 2008. Construire les compétences individuelles et collectives. Paryż: Groupe Eyrolles
Bruner, J. 2006 [1997] „Narracyjna konstrukcja rzeczywistości”, (w) Kultura Edukacji. Przekład: T.Brzostowska-Tereszkiewicz, Kraków: Universitas
Mezirow, J. 2001 [1991]. Penser son expérience. Une voie vers l’autoformation. Przekład z amerykańskiego: Daniel i Guy Bonvalot. Lyon: Chronique Sociale
Narcy-Combes, J.P. 2005. Didactiques des langues et TIC: vers une recherche-action responsable. Paryż: Ophrys
License
Copyright (c) 1970 Joanna Stańczyk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors
Authors of texts accepted for publication in Neofilolog are required to complete, sign and return to the Editorial team’s office the Agreement for granting a royalty-free license to works with a commitment to grant a CC sub-license.
Under the agreement, the authors of the texts published in Neofilolog grant Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań a non-exclusive, royalty-free license and authorize the use of Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license.
The authors retain the right to the free disposal of the work.
Users
Interested Internet users are entitled to use works that have been published in Neofilolog since 2017, under the following conditions:
▪ attribution – obligation to provide, together with the distributed work, information about the authorship, title, source (link to the original work, DOI) and the license itself.
▪ no derivatives – the work must be preserved in its original form. Without the author's consent, it is not possible to distribute the modified work in the form of translations, publications, etc.
Copyrights are reserved for all texts published since 2017.
Miscellaneous
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań retains the property right as a whole (layout, graphic form, title, cover design, logo etc.).