Mots-clés
complexity
intercultural
interdisciplinary
performative turn
performative SLE
Comment citer
Résumé
Second language education (SLE) must remain open to developments in the world if it is to be relevant to those who have an investment in it: learners, teachers and researchers. However, the broadening of the in-terdisciplinary nature of SLE that may occur because of this is not with-out its problems. New areas will bring ideas and terminology that will make SLE as a discipline even more complex. In addition, the ideas and terminology may be disputed in the fields from which they originate thus compounding the problem of complexity. The article looks at the example of the performative in SLE and how it supports an approach that is interdisciplinary and intercultural. It also looks at some of the problems this causes: the implications of implementing an SLE practice that is performative, the fact that there are different performative prac-tices, as well as variance between seemingly similar performative prac-tices because of national and cultural differences. The article concludes with the description of two studies which show the complex nature of performative SLE as praxis.Références
Bańczerowski J. (1975), Is Metaglottodidactics Necessary? (in) “Glottodidactica”, No. 8, pp. 21-26.
Blaszk M. (2016), An inquiry into happening in school education: some of the questions it poses to teaching English as a foreign language in schools (in) Stanulewicz D., Janczukowicz K., Rocławska-Daniluk M. (eds.), Language education: controversies, observations and proposals. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 199-214.
Blaszk M. (2017), Happening in Education – Theoretical Issues. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Council of Europe (2001), Common European Framework of Reference for Lan-guages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crutchfield J., Schewe M. (2017), Introduction: Going Performative in Intercul-tural Education. International Contexts, Theoretical Perspectives and Models of Practice (in) Crutchfield J., Schewe M. (eds.), Going Performa-tive in Intercultural Education. International Contexts, Theoretical Per-spectives and Models of Practice.Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. xi-xxv.
Dakowska M. (2014), O rozwoju dydaktyki języków obcych jako dyscypliny naukowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Domańska E. (2007), „Zwrot performatywny” we współczesnej humanistyce (in) “Teksty Drugie”, No. 5, pp. 48-61.
Geertz C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Goffman E. (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
Frimberger K. (2017), The Ethics of Performative Approaches in Intercultural Education (in) Crutchfield J., Schewe M. (eds.), Going Performative in Intercultural Education. International Contexts, Theoretical Perspec-tives and Models of Practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp.21-40.
Garoian C.R. (1999), Performing Pedagogy: Toward an Art of Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Karpińska-Musiał B. (2015), Międzykulturowość w glottodydaktyce. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Kirby M. (1966), Happenings: An Illustrated Anthology. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co., Inc.
Królica, M. (2006), Drama i happening w edukacji przedszkolnej. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
Layzell R. (1993), Live Art In Schools. London: The Arts Council of Great Britain.
Maley A., Duff A. (1987), Drama Techniques in Language Learning: A Resource Book of Communication Activities for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morawski S. (1971), Happening (2). Rodowód – charakter – funkcje (in) “Dialog”, No. 10, pp. 117-144.
Pawłowski T. (1982), Happening. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Rintoul D. (2011), Drama workshops attended by the author. Between Festival, 19-21 May. Sopot, TeatrWybrzeże – ScenaKameralna.
Schechner R. (1982), The End of Humanism: Writings on Performance. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.
Sobkowiak P. (2015), Interkulturowość w edukacji językowej. Pożnan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Turner V. (1957), Schism and Continuity in African Society: A Study of Ndembu Village Life. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Wilczyńska W., Michońska-Stadnik A. (2010), Metodologia badań w glottodydaktyce. Wprowadzenie. Kraków: Avalon.
Licence
© Neofilolog 2019
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Auteurs :
Les auteurs de textes acceptés pour publication dans la revue Neofilolog sont tenus de remplir, signer et renvoyer à l'adresse de la rédaction, un accord sur l'octroi d'une licence gratuite pour les œuvres, avec obligation d'accorder une sous-licence CC.
En vertu de cet accord, les auteurs des textes publiés dans la revue Neofilolog accordent à l'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań une licence non exclusive et gratuite et permettent l'utilisation de la sous-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Les auteurs se réservent le droit de disposer librement de l'œuvre.
Utilisateurs :
Les utilisateurs d'Internet intéressés ont le droit d'utiliser les œuvres publiées à partir de l'année 2017 sous réserve des conditions suivantes :
- reconnaissance de la qualité d'auteur - l'obligation de fournir des informations sur la qualité d'auteur, le titre, la source (liens vers l'œuvre originale, DOI) et la licence, ainsi que l'œuvre distribuée ;
- sans créer d'œuvres dérivées - l'œuvre doit être conservée dans sa forme originale, p. ex. les traductions ou les interprétations ne peuvent être distribuées sans le consentement de l'auteur.
Tous les textes publiés sont soumis au droit d'auteur.
Autres :
L'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań se réserve le droit à la revue dans son ensemble (mise en page, forme graphique, titre, conception de la couverture, logo, etc.).
.