Mots-clés
reflective practice
teacher education
teacher development
critical reflection
Comment citer
Résumé
Preparing thoughtful reflective practitioners has become a common concept in the teacher education literature. Prior educational experiences offer excellent opportunity for students to reflect on authentic teaching examples and provide constructive ways to engage in reflective practice. This study examines critical incidents as a tool for developing reflective thinking skills among teacher trainees (N=11). The research on use of critical incidents for training comprised a questionnaire and group discussions. The instrument used for analyzing critical incidents included personal details, factual information and open-ended questions concerning reasons for and consequences of the incident, associated emotions, reflections connected with it, lessons from this incident and its implications for the future. Overall, although some crucial issues arose, the technique proved useful for training, and was assessed as positive and valuable by the teacher trainees. Some pedagogical implications were formulated regarding problems with understanding the notion of critical incident, previous training of the teacher trainees and the need for a supportive environment.
Références
Babione C. (2015), Practitioner teacher inquiry and research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Brookfield S.D. (1990), The skillful teacher. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Bruster B.G., Peterson B.R. (2013), Using critical incidents in teaching to promote reflective practice. „Reflective Practice”, No 14/2, pp.170-182.
Cirocki A., Farrell T. S. (2017). Reflective practice for professional development of TESOL practitioners. “The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL”, No 6/2, pp. 5-23.
Davies H, Kinloch H. (2000), Critical incident analysis: facilitating reflection and transfer of learning, (in:) Cree V.E., Macaulay C. (eds.), Transfer of learning in professional and vocational education. London: Routledge, pp. 137-147.
Dewey J. (1933), How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: DC Heath.
Farrell T.S. (2007), Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London: Continuum Press.
Farrell T.S. (2015), Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Farrell T.S. (2018), Reflective language teaching: Practical applications for TESOL teachers. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Farrell T.S., Baecher L. (2017), Reflecting on critical incidents in language education: 40 dilemmas for novice TESOL professionals. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Finlay L. (2008), Reflecting on reflexive practice. The Open University „PBPL paper”, No 52, pp. 1-27.
Flanagan J.C. (1954), The critical incident technique. „Psychological Bulletin”, No 51/4, pp. 327-358.
Griffin M.L. (2003), Using critical incidents to promote and assess reflective thinking in pre-service teachers. „Reflective Practice”, No 4/2, pp. 207-220.
Griffin M.L., Scherr T.G. (2010), Using critical incident reporting to promote objectivity and self-knowledge in pre-service school psychologists. „School Psychology International”, No 31/1, pp. 3-20.
Harris A.S., Bruster B., Peterson B., Shutt T. (2010), Examining and facilitating reflection to improve professional practice. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Jay J.K., Johnson K.L. (2002), Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education. „Teaching and Teacher Education”, No 18, pp.73-85.
Johnson K.E., Golombek P.R. (2002), Teachers' narrative inquiry as professional development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kiliańska-Przybyło G. (2009), Rozwijanie refleksyjności nauczycieli języków obcych na przykładzie techniki analizy zdarzeń krytycznych. Studium przypadku. „Neofilolog”, No 33, pp. 65-75.
MacLachlan M., McAuliffe E. (1993), Critical incidents for psychology students in a refugee camp: Implications for counseling. „Counselling Psychology Quarterly”, No 6/1, pp. 3-11.
Mann S., Walsh S. (2017), Reflective practice in English language teaching: Research-based principles and practices. New York: Routledge.
Michońska-Stadnik A. (2009), Od wyboru podręcznika do rozwoju autonomicznego poznania. Rola refleksji w kształceniu nauczycieli języków obcych, (in:) Pawlak M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak A., Pietrzykowska A. (eds.), Nauczyciel języków obcych dziś i jutro. Poznań: Wydział Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny UAM w Poznaniu, pp. 97-106.
Ross D. (1990), Programmatic structures for the preparation of reflective teachers, (in:) Clift R.T., Houston W.R., Pugach M.C. (eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 97-118.
Rossman G.B., Rallis S.F. (2014), Everyday Ethics: Reflections on Practice. „International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education”, No 23/4, pp. 379-391.
Schön D.A. (1983), The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Schön D.A. (1987), Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Shapira-Lishchinsky O. (2011), Teachers’ critical incidents: Ethical dilemmas in teaching practice. “Teaching and Teacher Education”, No 27/3, pp. 648-656.
Tripp D. (1993), Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgement. Abingdon: Routledge.
Valli L. (1997), Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States. „Peabody Journal of Education”, No 72/1, pp. 67-88.
Werbińska D. (2009), Dylematy etyczne nauczycieli języków obcych. Warszawa: Fraszka Edukacyjna.
Werbińska D. (2017), The formation of language teacher professional identity: A phenomenogrpahic-narrative study. Słupsk: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pomorskiej w Słupsku.
Zawadzka-Bartnik E. (2014), Refleksja w zawodzie nauczyciela - założenia a realne możliwości realizacji. „Neofilolog”, No 43/1, pp. 7-23.
Licence
© Neofilolog 2020
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Auteurs :
Les auteurs de textes acceptés pour publication dans la revue Neofilolog sont tenus de remplir, signer et renvoyer à l'adresse de la rédaction, un accord sur l'octroi d'une licence gratuite pour les œuvres, avec obligation d'accorder une sous-licence CC.
En vertu de cet accord, les auteurs des textes publiés dans la revue Neofilolog accordent à l'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań une licence non exclusive et gratuite et permettent l'utilisation de la sous-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Les auteurs se réservent le droit de disposer librement de l'œuvre.
Utilisateurs :
Les utilisateurs d'Internet intéressés ont le droit d'utiliser les œuvres publiées à partir de l'année 2017 sous réserve des conditions suivantes :
- reconnaissance de la qualité d'auteur - l'obligation de fournir des informations sur la qualité d'auteur, le titre, la source (liens vers l'œuvre originale, DOI) et la licence, ainsi que l'œuvre distribuée ;
- sans créer d'œuvres dérivées - l'œuvre doit être conservée dans sa forme originale, p. ex. les traductions ou les interprétations ne peuvent être distribuées sans le consentement de l'auteur.
Tous les textes publiés sont soumis au droit d'auteur.
Autres :
L'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań se réserve le droit à la revue dans son ensemble (mise en page, forme graphique, titre, conception de la couverture, logo, etc.).
.